IronRuby 和 IronPython 的性能比较
我们的目标是使用 DLR 的 Microsoft.Scripting 和托管程序集来实现脚本机制。
现在，有人知道 IronRuby 1.0 和 IronPython 2.6 之间的性能差异吗？
据我了解，他们有不同的编译器，但 IronPython 似乎更成熟且经过测试，但如果有人有关于此问题的文档或知识，我们将不胜感激。
We're aiming to implement a scripting mechanism, using DLR's Microsoft.Scripting and hosting assembly.
Now, someone knows about any performance difference between IronRuby 1.0 and IronPython 2.6?
To my understanding they have different compilers, but IronPython seems more mature and tested, but if anyone has documentation or knowledge on this issue, that would be appreciated.
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（1）
IronPython 有更多的时间专注于性能改进，但 IronRuby 最近已经取得了显着的性能改进。然而，我们很少将 IronRuby 与 IronPython 进行比较。虽然人们可能会在这里评论说其中一个更快，并且某些特殊情况/示例甚至可以用来证明这一点，但目前还没有详尽的比较。
IronPython has had more time to focus on performance improvements, but IronRuby has made significant performance improvements as of late. However, we rarely pin IronRuby up against IronPython. While people may comment here that one or the other is faster, and certain special cases/examples may even be uses to prove this, there is no exhaustive comparison available today.