抛出 ObjectDisposeException 时应该传递什么作为 objectName？
在实现 IDisposable 时，我知道在对象被释放后不应调用的每个方法都应抛出 ObjectDispositedException。但是应该传递给异常构造函数的名称对象的标准是什么？
When implementing IDisposable, I undertand that every method that shouldn't be called after the object's been disposed should throw the ObjectDisposedException. But what is the standard for the name object that should be passed to the exception's constructor?
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（3）
我相信推荐的做法是抛出以下内容：
或者包括检查，这两行代码位于需要它的每个方法的顶部（显然不是
Dispose方法本身）：甚至可能会有所帮助将其重构为一个小方法以提高可用性。
I believe the recommended practice is to throw the following:
Or including the check, these two lines of code at the top of each method that needs it (obviously not the
Disposemethod itself):Might even be helpful to refactor this into a tiny method for usability.
甚至 .NET Framework 本身在这里也不是很一致。
David M. Kean（Microsoft FxCop 团队的前开发人员）向 ObjectDisposeException 的 MSDN 文档：
Even the .NET Framework itself isn't very consistent here.
David M. Kean (former developer on the FxCop team at Microsoft) added a comment to the MSDN documentation for the ObjectDisposedException:
我不相信有一个标准，我会返回对象的类型以及唯一标识字段（某种“主键”）的字符串内容。
I don't believe there's a standard for that, I would return the type of the object along with the string content of a unique identifying field (a 'Primary Key' of sorts).