在 VB 2008 中,为什么处理短整型比处理整数花费更长的时间?
在此示例中:
Sub Button1_Click(sender As Object, ByVal e As EventArgs) Handles Button1.Click
Dim stopwatch1, stopwatch2 As New Stopwatch : Dim EndLoop As ULong = 10000
stopwatch1.Start()
For cnt As ULong = 1 To EndLoop
Dim Number1 As UInt32
For Number1 = 1 To 20000
Dim Number2 As UInt32 = 0
Number2 += 1
Next
Next
stopwatch1.Stop()
stopwatch2.Start()
For cnt As ULong = 1 To EndLoop
Dim Number1 As UShort
For Number1 = 1 To 20000
Dim Number2 As UShort = 0
Number2 += 1
Next
Next
stopwatch2.Stop()
Label1.Text = "UInt32: " & stopwatch1.ElapsedMilliseconds
Label2.Text = "UShort: " & stopwatch2.ElapsedMilliseconds
End Sub
对于 UInt32 循环,我始终获得约 950 毫秒的时间;对于 UShort 循环,我始终获得约 1900 毫秒的时间。如果我将 UShort 更改为 Short,我也会得到大约 1900 毫秒。
此外,我可以将第二个循环更改为:
stopwatch2.Start()
For cnt As ULong = 1 To EndLoop
Dim Number1 As Integer
For Number1 = 1 To 20000
Dim Number2 As Integer = 0
Number2 += 1
Next
Next
stopwatch2.Stop()
整数循环将始终为 660 毫秒,而 UInt32 循环为 950 毫秒。
与 Short、UShort 和 UInt32 相比,整数是使用速度更快的数据类型吗?如果是这样,为什么?
In this example:
Sub Button1_Click(sender As Object, ByVal e As EventArgs) Handles Button1.Click
Dim stopwatch1, stopwatch2 As New Stopwatch : Dim EndLoop As ULong = 10000
stopwatch1.Start()
For cnt As ULong = 1 To EndLoop
Dim Number1 As UInt32
For Number1 = 1 To 20000
Dim Number2 As UInt32 = 0
Number2 += 1
Next
Next
stopwatch1.Stop()
stopwatch2.Start()
For cnt As ULong = 1 To EndLoop
Dim Number1 As UShort
For Number1 = 1 To 20000
Dim Number2 As UShort = 0
Number2 += 1
Next
Next
stopwatch2.Stop()
Label1.Text = "UInt32: " & stopwatch1.ElapsedMilliseconds
Label2.Text = "UShort: " & stopwatch2.ElapsedMilliseconds
End Sub
I consistently get about 950 ms for the UInt32 loop, and about 1900 ms for the UShort loop. I get about 1900 ms as well if I changed the UShort to a Short.
Additionally, I can change the second loop to:
stopwatch2.Start()
For cnt As ULong = 1 To EndLoop
Dim Number1 As Integer
For Number1 = 1 To 20000
Dim Number2 As Integer = 0
Number2 += 1
Next
Next
stopwatch2.Stop()
And the integer loop will be consistently 660 ms, compared to 950 ms for the UInt32 loop.
Are Integers the faster data type to use compared to Short, UShort and UInt32? If so, why?
如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱,如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论,将不能在第一时间通知您!
发布评论
评论(1)
我敢打赌这是因为你的机器上的自然字大小是 32 位,而执行 16 位操作实际上会给系统带来更大的压力来剪切和屏蔽这些位。
如果您在 64 位处理器上进行测试,则 Int64 可能会比 Int32 获得更好的结果...
此外,在 .NET 中,所有整数(最多 32 位)算术都会自动向上转换为
int
,因此,当您将结果分配回short
变量时,会导致额外的转换步骤。 uint 也是如此。I would bet it's because the natural word size on your machine is 32 bit, and doing 16 bit operations actually puts more strain on the system to cut and mask the bits.
If you'd test on a 64 bit processor, you might get better results for Int64 than for Int32...
Also, in .NET all integer (up to 32bit) arithmetics is automatically upcasted to
int
, so when you're assigning the result back to ashort
variable, you're causing an extra casting step. Same goes for uint.