什么是“丘吉尔仿冒品”？
我读过 xUnit 测试模式。 http://martinfowler.com/books.html Martin Fowler 的文章中有这样的“丘吉尔式山寨”表达……
如果你访问 junit.org，你会看到我的一句话：“在软件开发领域，从来没有这么多人欠下如此多的人情。”这么少的代码行”。 JUnit 被批评为一件小事，任何理性的程序员都可以在周末完成。这是事实，但完全没有抓住重点。 JUnit 之所以重要，值得丘吉尔模仿，是因为这个微小工具的存在对于许多程序员的根本转变至关重要。测试已转移到编程的前端和中心部分。人们以前就提倡过它，但 JUnit 比其他任何事情都更使它成为现实。
我没有搜索到“丘吉尔仿冒品”。 你能帮我知道这是什么意思吗？ 提前致谢。
I've read xUnit Test Patterns.
http://martinfowler.com/books.html
There is 'Churchillian knock-off' expression in Martin Fowler's writes like this...
If you go to junit.org, you'll see a quote from me: "never in the field of software development have so many owed so much to so few lines of code". JUnit has been criticized as a minor thing, something any reasonable programmer could produce in a weekend. This is true, but utterly misses the point. The reason JUnit is important, and deserves the Churchillian knock-off, is that the presence of this tiny tool has been essential to a fundamental shift for many programmers. A shift where testing has moved to a front and central part of programming. People have advocated it before, but JUnit made it happen more than anything else.
I have failed to search about 'Churchillian knock-off'.
Could you help me know what it means?
Thanks in advance.
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（2）
“在软件开发领域，从来没有这么多人归功于这么少的代码”，这是从温斯顿·S·丘吉尔在谈到不列颠之战时的演讲中盗用的。丘吉尔说：
“在人类冲突领域，从来没有如此多的人对如此少的人负有如此多的责任”（凭记忆引用）。
"never in the field of software development have so many owed so much to so few lines of code" is stolen from Winston S. Churchill's speech referring to the Battle of Britain. Churchill said:
"Never in the field of human conflict, has so much been owed by so many to so few" (quoting from memory).
他指的是“从未在战场上”的名言——丘吉尔在不列颠之战中也说过类似的话。
He's referring to the "never in the field" quote - Churchill said something very similar about the Battle of Britain.