主要有哪些C/C++规格
在对“C/C++ 程序员”与未提及/现有的“C/C++ 语言”产生误解并最终解决问题后，我决定作废它。
我投票删除它，并计划将问题分成两部分（C 语言规范、编译器及其版本差异，以及 C++ 语言规范、编译器及其版本差异），但事实证明这是一个带有（格式不正确）答案的问题无法删除。
这对我的经历来说是一个很大的转折点......无法重新阐述一个错误关闭的错误答案的问题......哎呀。
After there was a misunderstanding of "C/C++ programmers" with the a non-mentioned/existing "C/C++ language", and eventually getting the question closed, I decided to void it.
I had voted to delete it, and planned to split the question in two (C language specification, compilers and their version diffs, and C++ language specs, compilers and their version diffs), but it turns out a question with (ill formed) answers can't be deleted.
That was a big turn off for my SO experience... can't reformfulate a wrongly-closed ill-answered question... ouch.
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（3）
不存在“C/C++”语言这样的东西。两者具有完全不同的语言标准，并且在使用上有很多很多方面的不同。如果你想了解 C 或 C++，我建议（这对于任何语言都是如此）；
阅读一本由该语言的创始人之一撰写的书。对于 C，这将是 Kernighan 和 Ritchie 第 2 版，对于 C++，是 Stroustrup 的《C++ 编程语言，第 3 版》。
当您熟悉该语言时，获取一份语言标准的副本。
我还可以说，在我使用互联网的所有时间里，我从未找到过可以达到现有纸质文档质量的 C++ 在线资源。
There is no such thing as the "C/C++" language. The two have completely different language standards and differ in use in many, many ways. If you want to understand either C or C++ I suggest (and this is true for any language);
read a book authored by one of the originators of the language. For C this would be Kernighan and Ritchie 2nd Ed, and for C++, Stroustrup's The C++ Programming Language, 3rd Ed.
when you are comfortable with the language, get a copy of the language standard.
And can I also say that in all my time using the internet, I've never found an online resource for C++ that could approach the quality of the available paper documentation.
维基百科关于 C 的文章 和 C++ 有很好的参考。
Wikipedia's articles on C and C++ have good references.
ISO C 工作组将是一个良好的开始：http://www.open- std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG14/。但在那里很难找到任何东西。
The ISO C working group would be a good start: http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG14/. But it's pretty hard to find anything on there.