为什么我应该使用“使用”关键字来访问我的基类方法?

发布于 2024-08-15 05:53:56 字数 680 浏览 10 评论 0原文

我编写了下面的代码来解释我的问题。如果我注释第 11 行(使用关键字“using”),编译器不会编译该文件并显示此错误:从 'char' 到 'const char*' 的转换无效。在Son类中似乎没有看到Parent类的方法void action(char)

为什么编译器会这样?还是我做错了什么?

class Parent
{
    public:
        virtual void action( const char how ){ this->action( &how ); }
        virtual void action( const char * how ) = 0;
};

class Son : public Parent
{
    public:
        using Parent::action; // Why should i write this line?
        void action( const char * how ){ printf( "Action: %c\n", *how ); }
};

int main( int argc, char** argv )
{
    Son s = Son();
    s.action( 'a' );
    return 0;
}

I wrote the below code in order to explain my issue. If I comment the line 11 (with the keyword "using"), the compiler does not compile the file and displays this error: invalid conversion from 'char' to 'const char*'. It seems to not see the method void action(char) of the Parent class in the Son class.

Why the compiler behave this way? Or have I done something wrong?

class Parent
{
    public:
        virtual void action( const char how ){ this->action( &how ); }
        virtual void action( const char * how ) = 0;
};

class Son : public Parent
{
    public:
        using Parent::action; // Why should i write this line?
        void action( const char * how ){ printf( "Action: %c\n", *how ); }
};

int main( int argc, char** argv )
{
    Son s = Son();
    s.action( 'a' );
    return 0;
}

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(5

╰つ倒转 2024-08-22 05:53:56

派生类中声明的 action 隐藏了基类中声明的 action。如果您在 Son 对象上使用 action,编译器将在 Son 中声明的方法中搜索,找到一个名为 action 的方法>,然后使用它。它不会继续在基类的方法中搜索,因为它已经找到了匹配的名称。

然后该方法与调用的参数不匹配,并且您会收到错误。

另请参阅 C++ 常见问题解答,了解有关此主题的更多说明。

The action declared in the derived class hides the action declared in the base class. If you use action on a Son object the compiler will search in the methods declared in Son, find one called action, and use that. It won't go on to search in the base class's methods, since it already found a matching name.

Then that method doesn't match the parameters of the call and you get an error.

See also the C++ FAQ for more explanations on this topic.

终遇你 2024-08-22 05:53:56

令人惊讶的是,这是标准行为。如果派生类声明的方法与基类定义的方法同名,则派生类的方法将隐藏基类的方法。

请参阅C++ 常见问题解答

Surprisingly this is standard behavior. If a derived class declares a method with the same name as a method defined by the base class, the derived class' method hides the base class' one.

See C++ FAQ

流星番茄 2024-08-22 05:53:56

请注意:在这种情况下需要使用“using”是一个危险信号,您的代码可能会让其他开发人员感到困惑(毕竟它使编译器感到困惑!)。您可能应该重命名这两种方法之一,以使其他程序员清楚地区别。

一种可能性:

void action( const char how )
{ 
  takeAction( &how ); 
}
void action( const char * how )
{
  takeAction(how);
}
virtual void takeAction(const char * how) = 0;

A note of caution: The need to use a "using" in this situation is a red flag that your code may be confusing for other developers (after all it confused the compiler!). It is likely that you should rename one of the two methods to make the distinction clear to other programmers.

One possibility:

void action( const char how )
{ 
  takeAction( &how ); 
}
void action( const char * how )
{
  takeAction(how);
}
virtual void takeAction(const char * how) = 0;
再浓的妆也掩不了殇 2024-08-22 05:53:56

如果在派生类中重新定义了任何重载函数,则基类中的所有重载函数都将被隐藏。
包含这两种功能的一种方法是避免类中的函数重载。或者
您可以按使用方式使用 using 关键字。

If in a derived class any over loaded function is redefined then all the overloaded function in the base class is hidden.
One way to include both the functionality is to avoid function overloading in classes. or
You can use using keyword, as used.

隔纱相望 2024-08-22 05:53:56

通过使用using,基类中声明的名称被引入到派生类的命名空间中。

然后,当您在派生类中声明这组函数时,编译器会通过隐式 this 指针的类型将它们与基类中具有相同参数类型的函数区分开来。

在重载解析期间,需要类类型转换的参数具有最低优先级,当指向派生类的指针转换为指向基类的指针时,就会发生这种情况。

因此,可以区分具有看似相同的参数列表的两个函数,并且当从派生类型的对象调用它们时,本地声明的函数将是更好的(如果不是精确的)匹配。

我是新手,请指出我的错误。

By using using, the names declared in base class are introduced into the namespace of derived class.

Then, when you declare the set of functions in the derived class, they are distinguished from those with identical parameter types in its base class by compilers by the type of the implicit this pointer.

During overload resolution, an argument that needs a class-type conversion, which will happen when a pointer to derived class is converted to a pointer to a base class, is of the lowest priority.

So the two functions with seemingly identical parameter list can be distinguished, and when calling them from an object of the derived type, the one locally declared will be a better (if not exact) match.

I am a newbie and please point out my misunderstanding.

~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文