我应该等待 Flash Player 10.1 还是使用 Flash Lite 3 来为手机和设备开发 Flash 内容

发布于 2024-08-15 02:35:46 字数 581 浏览 5 评论 0原文

Adobe 将在 2010 年第一季度推出 Flash Player 10.1,这将在桌面和移动设备上提供一致的运行时(因此我假设如果它是为 Web 构建的,那么它也可以在移动设备上运行)。

我即将开始为手机开发基于 Flash 的应用程序,我应该考虑使用 FLash Lite 3 还是等到 Flash Player 10.1 发布。我想我的 flash lite 3 应用程序可能会在几个月内发布,届时 Flash Player 10.1 很快就会发布。现在大多数手机都支持 Flash Lite 3 但可能不支持 Flash Player 10.1,或者 Flash Player 10.1 推出后所有手机都可以使用吗?此版本将影响多少市场份额?

我仍然希望优化 Flash 10 以便在 Flash Player 10.1 上运行 Web 应用程序,使其在移动浏览器上表现更好,因此这仍然可能与构建独立的 Flash Lite 3 应用程序一样多。或者我根本不需要优化 - Flash Player 10.1 会在移动浏览器上提供相同的体验吗?

Flash Player 10.1 是否会提供相同的功能集,例如能够在移动设备上浏览文件并上传到网络?

这里还有什么要考虑的吗?

Adobe are launching Flash Player 10.1 in the first quarter of 2010, this will provide consistent runtime across desktops and mobile devices (so I assume if it was built for the web it will work on the mobile).

I am about to start developing an flash based application for mobile phones, should I look at using FLash Lite 3 or wait until Flash Player 10.1 comes out. I guess I could have my flash lite 3 app out there in a couple of months by which time Flash Player 10.1 will be coming very soon. Is it valid to say that the majority of handsets out there now support Flash Lite 3 and may not support Flash Player 10.1 or will all handsets be able to use Flash Player 10.1 when it comes out? What share of the market will this release affect?

I will still want to optimise my Flash 10 for web application to run on Flash Player 10.1 to make it perform better on a mobile browser so this is still potentially just as much work as building a standalone Flash Lite 3 app. Or do I not need to optimise at all - will Flash Player 10.1 deliver the same experience on a mobile browser?

Will Flash Player 10.1 offer the same feature set such as being able to browse files on a mobile and upload to the web?

anything else to consider here?

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(2

微凉徒眸意 2024-08-22 02:35:46

这里有两个观点:

  1. 现在针对 Flash Lite 3 几乎没有什么缺点,因为 Flash Player 10.1 应该可以毫无问题地播放以这种方式构建的内容。
  2. Flash Lite 3 完全用 ActionScript 2 编写,它的性能较差,语言结构复杂,并且约定俗成,导致不良的编程风格。最重要的是,您现有的 FP10 项目可能需要大量重写代码。

这也是一个关于你的内容和目标受众到底需要/建议什么的问题。只有您知道您的受众对手持设备和物理功能要求。

考虑到所有因素,我会推广 Flash Player 10.1,因为您将获得更好的语言以及应用程序版本之间更容易的功能对等。

至于您的其他问题(您当前的站点和功能集),您当然需要查看当前在网络上运行的 FP10 SWF 的内存占用情况,看看它是否可以在低内存环境中运行有关功能的更多 FP10.1 信息,请参见此处

There are two perspectives to take here:

  1. There is little to no downside to targeting Flash Lite 3 right now in that Flash Player 10.1 should have no trouble playing back content built in that way.
  2. Flash Lite 3 is written entirely in ActionScript 2 which provides inferior performance, convoluted language composition, and conventions that promote bad programming style. On top of that, your existing FP10 project would likely need a substantial code rewrite.

This is also a question of what exactly your content and target audience require/suggest. Only you know your audience of handhelds and physical functional requirements.

All things considered, I would promote Flash Player 10.1 as you get a much better language along with it and much easier feature-parity between the versions of your app.

As for your other concerns (your current site and feature set), you certainly do need to take a look at the memory footprint of your FP10 SWF that is currently live on the web to see if it can even be run in a low memory environment and more FP10.1 info can be found here regarding features.

花之痕靓丽 2024-08-22 02:35:46

只要开始研究它并做出一些可用的东西即可。您会发现许多甚至与您正在使用的技术无关的细节。一旦你有了可行的东西,你就可以考虑迁移到更好的(?)技术,看看它是否真的值得。

Just start working on it and make something usable. You will discover a lot of details that are not even related to the technology you are using. Once you have something that is working, you can consider migrating to a better(?) technology and see if it is really worth.

~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文