SEO 的合法 URL 伪装？
我刚刚问了这两个问题，一个关于 flash seo url 最佳实践，另一个关于Flash 中 seo 的 URL 重定向，它让我阅读了有关 < a href="http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=66355" rel="nofollow noreferrer">伪装和偷偷摸摸的 JavaScript 重定向。
伪装和偷偷摸摸的 JavaScript 重定向 文章中说：
“在 noscript 标记中提供 JavaScript 的文本内容...确保在两个元素中提供相同的内容（例如，在 JavaScript 中提供与 noscript 标记中相同的文本）。在替代元素可能会导致 Google 对网站采取行动。”
“使用 JavaScript 是完全合法的 Web 实践。但是，使用 JavaScript 来欺骗搜索引擎则不然。例如，在 JavaScript 中放置与 noscript 标记不同的文本就违反了我们的网站站长指南，因为它会显示不同的文本。为用户（看到基于 JavaScript 的文本）提供的内容，而不是为搜索引擎（看到基于 noscript 的文本）提供的内容。”
对我来说，这听起来像是，如果您有一个 Flash 网站，并且您希望它进行 SEO，那么如果您向 google 呈现一个与 flash swf 具有相同文本内容的 html 页面，那么您就是安全的。只要我不是“意图欺骗搜索引擎”并且不是“在备用[flash]元素中包含实质上不同的内容”，我就安全吗？这是合法的吗？有人验证过这个吗？
我还从那套网站管理员指南中得知，将 site.com/home.html 之类的 url 重定向到 site.com/#/home 以进行 Flash 是可以接受的用户，因为目的不是欺骗，如果他们只是“视图”不同，而“模型”保持不变，那么这合法吗？
他们在那篇文章中也说：
“请注意，在 JavaScript 中放置链接本身并不具有欺骗性。在检查您网站上的 JavaScript 以确保您的网站遵守我们的指南时，请考虑其意图。”
...所以这似乎是一个合法的解决方案，不是吗？也就是说，将用户重定向到适当的 flash url，并呈现 html 以实现必要的可访问性和 SEO。
我理解偷偷摸摸和伪装可能会产生恶意，但这绝对不是意图。我正在寻找更多类似的东西，我怎样才能做到这一点而不让谷歌生气？
老实说，我不明白谷歌如何能够判断我是否在 Rails 中添加了一些内容来检查用户代理并使用如下内容为谷歌呈现无 Flash 的 html 页面： 关闭机器人的 Rails 会话。如果我检查用户代理并仅重定向用户，而不是谷歌机器人，谷歌是否能够看到这一点？
更新
是这样的Fleb Flash Framework“隐藏”吗？它们有一个 div 元素，可以返回 flash swf 或纯 html 内容。或者使用 Flash 进行 SEO
I have just asked these two questions, one on flash seo url best practices and one on url redirects for seo in flash, and it got me to read more about cloaking and sneaky javascript redirects.
In that cloaking and sneaky javascript redirects article, it says:
"Provide the textual contents of JavaScript in a noscript tag... Ensure that you provide the same content in both elements (for instance, provide the same text in the JavaScript as in the noscript tag). Including substantially different content in the alternate element may cause Google to take action on the site."
"Use of JavaScript is an entirely legitimate web practice. However, use of JavaScript with the intent to deceive search engines is not. For instance, placing different text in JavaScript than in a noscript tag violates our webmaster guidelines because it displays different content for users (who see the JavaScript-based text) than for search engines (which see the noscript-based text)."
To me that sounds like, if you have a Flash site, and you want it to be SEO, then if you render to google an html page with the same textual content as the flash swf, then you are safe. As long as I am not "with the intent to deceive search engines" and am not "including substantially different content in the alternate [flash] element", am I safe? Is that legitimate? Has anyone verified this?
I also get from that set of webmaster guidelines that it would be acceptable to redirect a url like site.com/home.html to site.com/#/home for flash users, because the intent is not to deceive and if they are only differing by the "View", with the "Model" staying the same, is that legitimate?
They say in that article too:
"Note that placement of links within JavaScript is alone not deceptive. When examining JavaScript on your site to ensure your site adheres to our guidelines, consider the intent."
... so it seems like this would be a legitimate solution, no? That is, redirecting users to the appropriate flash url, and rendering html for necessary accessibility and SEO.
I understand the malicious-ness that can arise out of sneakyness and cloaking, but that is definitely not the intent. I am looking for something more along the lines of, how could I accomplish this without google getting angry?
I honestly don't see how google would be able to tell if I added something in Rails that checked for the user agent and rendered a flash-less html page for google using something like this: turn off rails sessions for robots. If I checked for the user agent and only redirected the user, not the google bot, would google be able to see that?
Update
Is something like this Fleb Flash Framework "cloaking"? They have a div element which, either returns a flash swf or plain html content. Or this on SEO with Flash
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（1）
您可能对 Google 的改进的 Flash 索引功能感兴趣。即使使用纯 Flash 网站，您仍然可以获得良好的 SEO，尤其是获得高质量的入站链接。
您计划的重定向技术听起来合法，但仍然存在对 Google 索引算法来说可疑的风险。
You might be interested in Google's improved Flash indexing capabilities. Even with a pure Flash site you can still get good SEO, especially of you're getting high quality inbound links.
The redirection technique you're planning sounds legitimate, but there's still a risk it might appear suspicious to Google's indexing algorithms.