GlassFish ESB / Open ESB 的未来是什么
随着 SUN 和 Oracle 的合并：Open ESB 又名 GlassFish ESB 的未来是什么？该产品是否会因为 Oracle 拥有 Oracle Service Bus（原 BEA AquaLogic Service Bus）而停产？
With the merger of SUN and Oracle: What is the future of Open ESB a.k.a. GlassFish ESB? Is this a product which will be discontinued as Oracle has Oracle Service Bus (was BEA AquaLogic Service Bus)?
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（5）
甲骨文是一个很难预测的公司。
OpenEJB 更容易预测，因为它是开源的。它似乎仍然活跃，所以它可能会持续一年。谁能看得比这更远呢？
更大的问题是：EJB3 的采用率是多少？ EJB 模型已经被世界遗忘了吗？
就我个人而言，我认为 EJB 不再重要。我更喜欢春天。只要它充满活力，我就看不出有什么令人信服的理由回到 EJB。
我对 OpenESB 不太确定，因为我总体上对 ESB 持矛盾态度。我将它们视为供应商“大 SOA”销售策略的一部分，该策略承诺很大，但交付却很短。 ESB 可以是所有 Web 服务流量的集中调解器，也可以是单点故障瓶颈，具体取决于您的观点。我认为许多通常集中在 ESB 中的功能（例如，转换、路由、日志记录、审计等）可以在硬件中更好更快地完成 - 想想 Data Power 或更智能的 Cisco 交换机。
Oracle is a tough one to predict.
OpenEJB is easier to predict, because it's open source. It appears to still be active, so it's likely to carry on for another year. Who can see further out than that?
The larger question is: What will the adoption rate of EJB3 be? Has the world passed the EJB model by?
Personally, I don't consider EJBs to be important anymore. I prefer Spring. As long as it's vibrant, I can't see any compelling reason to go back to EJBs.
I'm not certain about OpenESB, because I'm ambivalent about ESBs in general. I've seen them as a piece of a "BIG SOA" selling strategy on the part of vendors that was big on promise and short on delivery. An ESB can be either a centralized mediator for all your web service traffic or a single point of failure bottleneck, depending on your point of view. I think that a lot of the functionality that is usually centralized in ESBs (e.g., transformation, routing, logging, auditing, etc.) could be done better and faster in hardware - think Data Power or smarter Cisco switches.
这不是营销技巧，而是一份白皮书，它提供了有关 OpenESB 未来的真实见解。这是过去、现在和未来。
http://www.logicoy.com/userfiles/openesb-past_present_future_news_letter.pdf
not a marketing trick but here is a white paper which provides a realworld insight on the future of OpenESB. It's past, Present and Future.
http://www.logicoy.com/userfiles/openesb-past_present_future_news_letter.pdf
据 Oracle 称，GlassfishESB/OpenESB 将支持（但我不确定这是否表明这将得到发展和维护）。如果您看到迁移的 glassfish esb / openesb 站点，您可以看到该产品 自 2009 年以来就不再发展（这是一团糟，因为它是一个真正的集成产品）。也许“forgerock.com”公司（正在维护一些著名且有趣的 Sun 产品，如 OpenSSO 和 OpenDs）可能有兴趣维护和发展这个良好的集成产品，并继续开发 fuji（GlassfishESB 3）。此时您可以将产品的演变与另一个选项（在ohloh net中）进行比较，您会发现不幸的是javaCAPS或OpenESB或GlassfishESB或fuji开发自2009.02以来就没有发展。
Oracle的战略似乎是soa套件的演变，那是一个非常好的产品，但有另一个许可条款。
另请参阅此相关链接：
请注意，Oracle Service Bus ( OSB）和 BEA AquaLogic Service Bus 是两种不同的产品，第一个产品被添加到实施 SCA 集成策略的 soa 套件中。
According Oracle, GlassfishESB/OpenESB will be supported (but I'm not sure that it indicates that will be evolved and maintained). If you see the migrated glassfish esb / openesb site you can see that the product won't evolved since 2009 (it's a mess because it was a really integration product). Maybe the "forgerock.com" company (who is maintaining some famous and interesting Sun products like OpenSSO and OpenDs) could be interested in maintain and evolve this good integration product and continue the development of fuji (GlassfishESB 3). At this time you can compare the evolution of the product with another option (in ohloh net), and you'll see that unfortunately javaCAPS or OpenESB or GlassfishESB or fuji development has not evolved since 2009.02.
Oracle Strategy seems to be the soa suite evolution, that is a really good product, but have another license terms.
See this related links too:
NOTE that Oracle Service Bus (OSB) and BEA AquaLogic Service Bus were two different products and the first one was added to the soa suite implementing the SCA integration strategy.
这是所有 OpenESB/GlassfishESB 客户共同关心的一个非常重要的问题。尽管目前还不清楚具体的路线。 Oracle一直在大力推广其Oracle Fusion中间件，该中间件的灵活性和优势无法与OpenESB/GlassfishESB相比。
最近，OpenESB 社区再次变得活跃，这一切都归功于 Pymma、Logicoy 和其他一些人所做的崇高工作。
与其他可用的 ESB 相比，我个人非常喜欢 OpenESB/GlassESB。
This has been a very important concern shared by all those OpenESB/GlassfishESB customers. Although it is still not clear on the exact course it will take. Oracle has been largely promoting its Oracle Fusion middleware which is nowhere comparable to the flexibility and strengths of OpenESB/GlassfishESB.
Lately the OpenESB community has become active again and all credits to he noble work by Pymma , Logicoy and few others.
I personally liked OpenESB/GlassESB very much when compared to other available ESBs.
Oracle 在收购开发 Java 应用程序服务器的公司、将该公司的应用程序服务器重命名为“Oracle AppServer”并悄悄放弃前一个方面有着悠久而辉煌的历史。因此，OAS 的每个主要版本都与之前的版本完全不同。
首先，他们自己写了（很糟糕，没有人用过），所以他们买了 Orion，并将 OC4J 更名为 OAS。然后他们收购了 BEA，并正在将 Weblogic 转变为 OAS。现在他们已经收购了 Sun，Glassfish 的技术将比 Weblogic 发展得更好（在我看来，Weblogic 有点像恐龙），因此预计 Glassfish 在未来某个时候会突然更名为 OAS。
Oracle has a long and distinguished history of buying companies that developed java appservers, renaming that company's appserver as "Oracle AppServer", and quietly ditching the previous one. As a result, each major version ofOAS is completely different to the previous one.
First, they wrote their own (it was crap, noone used it), so they bought Orion and renamed OC4J to OAS. Then they bought BEA, and are in the process of turning Weblogic into OAS. Now they've bought Sun, and Glassfish's technology is going to be better going forward than Weblogic (which, IMO is a bit of a dinosaur), and so expect Glassfish to suddenly be renamed OAS at some point in the future.