Technological measures are generally ineffective at solving these sorts of social problems. Manual moderation is pretty much the only really big useful thing you can do.
Successful sites of this nature tend to leverage the community to help with the task of moderation, by recruiting volunteer moderators from the more devoted regulars and/or providing post voting / flagging mechanisms (e.g. Stack Overflow).
Don't allow 'dislike' or vote down style 'voting'. Bullying will still occur in text. That is life and will likely require manual moderation even if you filter abusive words.
Default to private profiles. You can't stalk someone you're not friends with as you can't see their info.
No suggestion as this is a very difficult, if not impossible problem. You could take simple steps of filtering email addresses out as they're easily identifiable but there are always work-around's and there's much more personal info than email addresses.
See above.
Ultimately a site like this requires manual moderation if it is going to be a friendly place for children to visit online
The best thing you can do to protect children from abuse of your site is to never go public with it in the first place.
That's not what you wanted to hear. But when you set up any kind of social whatzit site, the question is not if it will be abused, but when. And when that happens, you won't have a chance to be concerned about children because you'll be busy fighting legal battles that threaten to sue your pants off and throw you in the slammer.
To try to be positive, the second best thing you can do is rigorously filter who gets membership on your site. Also, I see no way to get around the requirement for heavy monitoring and moderation.
发布评论
评论（3）
技术措施通常无法有效解决此类社会问题。手动审核几乎是您可以做的唯一真正有用的事情。
这种性质的成功网站倾向于利用社区来帮助完成审核任务，方法是从更忠诚的常客中招募志愿者版主和/或提供投票后/标记机制（例如 Stack Overflow）。
Technological measures are generally ineffective at solving these sorts of social problems. Manual moderation is pretty much the only really big useful thing you can do.
Successful sites of this nature tend to leverage the community to help with the task of moderation, by recruiting volunteer moderators from the more devoted regulars and/or providing post voting / flagging mechanisms (e.g. Stack Overflow).
最终，如果像这样的网站要成为儿童在线访问的友好场所，则需要手动审核
Ultimately a site like this requires manual moderation if it is going to be a friendly place for children to visit online
为了保护儿童免遭滥用您的网站，您能做的最好的事情就是从一开始就不要公开该网站。
这不是你想听到的。但是，当您建立任何类型的社交网站时，问题不在于它是否会被滥用，而在于何时被滥用。当这种情况发生时，你将没有机会关心孩子，因为你将忙于打法律官司，这些官司可能会起诉你，并将你扔进监狱。
为了保持积极的态度，您可以做的第二件事是严格过滤谁在您的网站上获得会员资格。另外，我认为没有办法绕过严格监控和审核的要求。
The best thing you can do to protect children from abuse of your site is to never go public with it in the first place.
That's not what you wanted to hear. But when you set up any kind of social whatzit site, the question is not if it will be abused, but when. And when that happens, you won't have a chance to be concerned about children because you'll be busy fighting legal battles that threaten to sue your pants off and throw you in the slammer.
To try to be positive, the second best thing you can do is rigorously filter who gets membership on your site. Also, I see no way to get around the requirement for heavy monitoring and moderation.