It looks like you've just pulled the top reputed members who have posted in each tag. Perhaps a better way to do it would be look at the amount of reputation gained in a tag by each member.
In the same way the tag badges are awarded. The results might still end up similar simply because the top ten users have so much more reputation than anyone else, but it might be a more accurate listing.
将我归类为 Java 专家在某种程度上是合理的。 Groovy 更具争议性 - 我是 Groovy in Action 的贡献者，但不经常使用 Groovy。我对 .NET 中的 XML 处理很合理，但我不会说我是专家。恐怕称我为 PHP 和 HTML 专家是可笑的。
(Answering on the grounds that hopefully it'll be moved to Meta soon.)
It would be somewhat reasonable to classify me as an expert in Java. Groovy is more debatable - I'm a contributor to Groovy in Action, but don't use Groovy regularly. I'm reasonable on XML handling in .NET but I wouldn't say I'm an expert. Calling me an expert in PHP and HTML is laughable I'm afraid.
发布评论
评论（2）
您似乎刚刚拉出了在每个标签中发帖的最知名会员。也许更好的方法是查看每个成员在标签中获得的声誉量。
以同样的方式授予标签徽章。结果可能仍然相似，只是因为前十名用户的声誉比其他任何人都高得多，但这可能是一个更准确的列表。
It looks like you've just pulled the top reputed members who have posted in each tag. Perhaps a better way to do it would be look at the amount of reputation gained in a tag by each member.
In the same way the tag badges are awarded. The results might still end up similar simply because the top ten users have so much more reputation than anyone else, but it might be a more accurate listing.
（回答的理由是希望它很快就会转移到 Meta。）
将我归类为 Java 专家在某种程度上是合理的。 Groovy 更具争议性 - 我是 Groovy in Action 的贡献者，但不经常使用 Groovy。我对 .NET 中的 XML 处理很合理，但我不会说我是专家。恐怕称我为 PHP 和 HTML 专家是可笑的。
(Answering on the grounds that hopefully it'll be moved to Meta soon.)
It would be somewhat reasonable to classify me as an expert in Java. Groovy is more debatable - I'm a contributor to Groovy in Action, but don't use Groovy regularly. I'm reasonable on XML handling in .NET but I wouldn't say I'm an expert. Calling me an expert in PHP and HTML is laughable I'm afraid.