是否有 BUG Calatog，通过一般描述对错误进行分类？
是否对错误进行了分类？根据它们的发生地点、副作用、复杂性等对它们进行实际分类和分组？包括他们的简短描述。
有什么建议可以在哪里找到或检查这样的资源吗？
谢谢
Is there any work done on classifying the bugs; practically categorizing and sub-grouping them based on their their occurrence place, side-effects, complexity and so on? With their brief descriptions included.
Any suggestion where to find or check such a resource?
Thanks
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（3）
“虫子”？在堆栈溢出中，还是什么？为此，我想有meta.stackoverflow.com。
如果您需要一般的错误跟踪软件，那么当然有很多，有很多免费和商业的替代品。
此索引列出了至少 30 个软件包，包括免费的和商业的。
"The bugs"? In Stack Overflow, or what? For that I guess there's meta.stackoverflow.com.
If you're after bug-tracking software in general there is of course plenty, with lots of free and commercial alternatives.
This index lists at least 30 packages, both free and commercial.
许多错误软件允许您根据某种方案确定优先级。我还没有找到通用的方案，但这是我使用的方案。
有 4 种严重程度。
这些错误按模块名称、版本进行分组，并进一步按紧急程度划分优先级。
Many bug softwares allow you to prioritize according to some scheme. I havent found a universal scheme, but this is the scheme i use.
there are 4 severities.
The bugs are grouped by module name , version and further prioritized by urgency.
错误定义为
换句话说;错误无法分类，因为它们与特定程序绑定，因此无法普遍追踪。换句话说；不，正如您必须说的，您不希望此列表用于哪个程序。
A bug is defined as
In other words; Bugs cannot be categorized as they are bound to a specific program and therefore are not universally traceable. In again other words; no, there is not, as you have to say, what program you want this list for.