系统集成建模方法
当谈到系统集成时，您如何对集成需求进行建模？您使用 UML 或 BPMN 或其他一些技术吗？
您认为现有方法有哪些局限性？您认为满足系统集成需求的理想建模方法是什么？
When it comes to systems integration, how do you model integration requirements? Do you use UML or BPMN or some other techniques?
What limitiations you see in existing approaches and what would be an ideal modeling approach to system integration requirements in your opinion?
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（2）
这个问题非常广泛，如果您想要更好的答案，可以进行细化（例如什么级别的系统？）。根据我的经验，以下方法行之有效，并在公司内得到广泛采用。这可能不适用于您的组织，但我们非常面向应用程序/数据集成，这些方法帮助我们跟踪高/流/数据实体级别的集成。成功的关键不是理想的模型，而是具有良好培训和示例/备忘单的实用模型。
一种似乎适用于组件/接口级别的系统集成的 UML 模型视图是带有组件的组件图，然后绘制出接口实现和接口用法。
还使用信息流的概念，无论是 UML 还是仅带有定义的行。然后只需选择您的抽象级别。示例：PeopleSoft ---（通过文件的人员详细信息）-----> Active Directory ---（通过 LDAP 的组）---->培训工具。
BPMN 确实适用于业务流程，虽然我真的认为它很棒，但这不是它应该使用的地方。
This question is really broad and could be refined (e.g. what level of system?) if you desire a better answer. The approaches below have worked in my experience and were adopted broadly within a company. This may not work for your organization, but our is very application/data integration oriented and these methods help us track integration at high/flow/data entity levels. The key to success is not the ideal model, but a practical one with good training and examples/cheat sheets.
One UML model view that seems to work will for system integration at the component/interface level is a component diagram with components and then interface realizations and interface usages drawn out.
Also using the concept of information flow either UML or just lines with a definition. Then just pick your level of abstraction. Example: PeopleSoft --- (Person Details via File) -----> Active Directory --- (Groups via LDAP) ----> Training Tool.
BPMN is for business process really and though I really think it is great this is not where it should be used.
OMG 已尝试使用 OMG 中集成的需求图来回答您的问题/www.omgsysml.org/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">sysml 建模语言。 SysML 工具提供商尝试解决您的问题。例如，查看 rational rhapsody 解决方案。
OMG has tried to answer to your question with the requirement diagram integrated in the sysml modeling langage. SysML tools providers try to solve your problem. For instance check out rational rhapsody solution.