自连接、交叉连接和分组
我从多个来源获得了随时间变化的温度样本表,我想找到所有来源在设定时间间隔内的最低、最高和平均温度。乍一看,这很容易做到,如下所示:
SELECT MIN(temp), MAX(temp), AVG(temp) FROM samples GROUP BY time;
但是,如果源不断进出,而不是在我想要的时间间隔内忽略丢失的源,事情就会变得更加复杂(到了我被难住的地步!)使用来源最后知道的缺失样本的温度。使用日期时间并在随时间分布不均匀的样本中构建间隔(例如每分钟)会使事情变得更加复杂。
我认为应该可以通过在示例表上进行自联接来创建我想要的结果,其中第一个表的时间大于或等于第二个表的时间,然后计算按以下方式分组的行的聚合值来源。然而,我对如何实际做到这一点感到困惑。
这是我的测试表:
+------+------+------+
| time | source | temp |
+------+------+------+
| 1 | a | 20 |
| 1 | b | 18 |
| 1 | c | 23 |
| 2 | b | 21 |
| 2 | c | 20 |
| 2 | a | 18 |
| 3 | a | 16 |
| 3 | c | 13 |
| 4 | c | 15 |
| 4 | a | 4 |
| 4 | b | 31 |
| 5 | b | 10 |
| 5 | c | 16 |
| 5 | a | 22 |
| 6 | a | 18 |
| 6 | b | 17 |
| 7 | a | 20 |
| 7 | b | 19 |
+------+------+------+
INSERT INTO samples (time, source, temp) VALUES (1, 'a', 20), (1, 'b', 18), (1, 'c', 23), (2, 'b', 21), (2, 'c', 20), (2, 'a', 18), (3, 'a', 16), (3, 'c', 13), (4, 'c', 15), (4, 'a', 4), (4, 'b', 31), (5, 'b', 10), (5, 'c', 16), (5, 'a', 22), (6, 'a', 18), (6, 'b', 17), (7, 'a', 20), (7, 'b', 19);
为了进行最小值、最大值和平均值计算,我想要一个如下所示的中间表:
+------+------+------+
| time | source | temp |
+------+------+------+
| 1 | a | 20 |
| 1 | b | 18 |
| 1 | c | 23 |
| 2 | b | 21 |
| 2 | c | 20 |
| 2 | a | 18 |
| 3 | a | 16 |
| 3 | b | 21 |
| 3 | c | 13 |
| 4 | c | 15 |
| 4 | a | 4 |
| 4 | b | 31 |
| 5 | b | 10 |
| 5 | c | 16 |
| 5 | a | 22 |
| 6 | a | 18 |
| 6 | b | 17 |
| 6 | c | 16 |
| 7 | a | 20 |
| 7 | b | 19 |
| 7 | c | 16 |
+------+------+------+
以下查询使我接近我想要的结果,但它采用源第一个结果的温度值,而不是给定时间间隔内的最新一个:
SELECT s.dt as sdt, s.mac, ss.temp, MAX(ss.dt) as maxdt FROM (SELECT DISTINCT dt FROM samples) AS s CROSS JOIN samples AS ss WHERE s.dt >= ss.dt GROUP BY sdt, mac HAVING maxdt <= s.dt ORDER BY sdt ASC, maxdt ASC;
+------+------+------+-------+
| sdt | mac | temp | maxdt |
+------+------+------+-------+
| 1 | a | 20 | 1 |
| 1 | c | 23 | 1 |
| 1 | b | 18 | 1 |
| 2 | a | 20 | 2 |
| 2 | c | 23 | 2 |
| 2 | b | 18 | 2 |
| 3 | b | 18 | 2 |
| 3 | a | 20 | 3 |
| 3 | c | 23 | 3 |
| 4 | a | 20 | 4 |
| 4 | c | 23 | 4 |
| 4 | b | 18 | 4 |
| 5 | a | 20 | 5 |
| 5 | c | 23 | 5 |
| 5 | b | 18 | 5 |
| 6 | c | 23 | 5 |
| 6 | a | 20 | 6 |
| 6 | b | 18 | 6 |
| 7 | c | 23 | 5 |
| 7 | b | 18 | 7 |
| 7 | a | 20 | 7 |
+------+------+------+-------+
更新: chadhoc(顺便说一句,名字很棒!)提供了一个很好的解决方案,不幸的是它在 MySQL 中不起作用,因为它不支持 他使用的是 FULL JOIN。幸运的是,我相信简单的 UNION 是一个有效的替代品:
-- Unify the original samples with the missing values that we've calculated
(
SELECT time, source, temp
FROM samples
)
UNION
( -- Pull all the time/source combinations that we are missing from the sample set, along with the temp
-- from the last sampled interval for the same time/source combination if we do not have one
SELECT a.time, a.source, (SELECT t2.temp FROM samples AS t2 WHERE t2.time < a.time AND t2.source = a.source ORDER BY t2.time DESC LIMIT 1) AS temp
FROM
( -- All values we want to get should be a cross of time/temp
SELECT t1.time, s1.source
FROM
(SELECT DISTINCT time FROM samples) AS t1
CROSS JOIN
(SELECT DISTINCT source FROM samples) AS s1
) AS a
LEFT JOIN samples s
ON a.time = s.time
AND a.source = s.source
WHERE s.source IS NULL
)
ORDER BY time, source;
更新 2:MySQL 为 chadhoc 代码提供了以下 EXPLAIN 输出:
+----+--------------------+------------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+------+-----------------------------+
| id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra |
+----+--------------------+------------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+------+-----------------------------+
| 1 | PRIMARY | temp | ALL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | 18 | |
| 2 | UNION | <derived4> | ALL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | 21 | |
| 2 | UNION | s | ALL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | 18 | Using where |
| 4 | DERIVED | <derived6> | ALL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | 3 | |
| 4 | DERIVED | <derived5> | ALL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | 7 | |
| 6 | DERIVED | temp | ALL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | 18 | Using temporary |
| 5 | DERIVED | temp | ALL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | 18 | Using temporary |
| 3 | DEPENDENT SUBQUERY | t2 | ALL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | 18 | Using where; Using filesort |
| NULL | UNION RESULT | <union1,2> | ALL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | Using filesort |
+----+--------------------+------------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+------+-----------------------------+
我能够让查尔斯的代码像这样工作:
SELECT T.time, S.source,
COALESCE(
D.temp,
(
SELECT temp FROM samples
WHERE source = S.source AND time = (
SELECT MAX(time)
FROM samples
WHERE
source = S.source
AND time < T.time
)
)
) AS temp
FROM (SELECT DISTINCT time FROM samples) AS T
CROSS JOIN (SELECT DISTINCT source FROM samples) AS S
LEFT JOIN samples AS D
ON D.source = S.source AND D.time = T.time
它的解释是:
+----+--------------------+------------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+------+-----------------+
| id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra |
+----+--------------------+------------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+------+-----------------+
| 1 | PRIMARY | <derived5> | ALL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | 3 | |
| 1 | PRIMARY | <derived4> | ALL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | 7 | |
| 1 | PRIMARY | D | ALL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | 18 | |
| 5 | DERIVED | temp | ALL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | 18 | Using temporary |
| 4 | DERIVED | temp | ALL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | 18 | Using temporary |
| 2 | DEPENDENT SUBQUERY | temp | ALL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | 18 | Using where |
| 3 | DEPENDENT SUBQUERY | temp | ALL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | 18 | Using where |
+----+--------------------+------------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+------+-----------------+
I've got a table of temperature samples over time from several sources and I want to find the minimum, maximum, and average temperatures across all sources at set time intervals. At first glance this is easily done like so:
SELECT MIN(temp), MAX(temp), AVG(temp) FROM samples GROUP BY time;
However, things become much more complicated (to the point of where I'm stumped!) if sources drop in and out and rather than ignoring the missing sources during the intervals in question I want to use the sources' last know temperatures for the missing samples. Using datetimes and constructing intervals (say every minute) across samples unevenly distributed over time further complicates things.
I think it should be possible to create the results I want by doing a self-join on the samples table where the time from the first table is greater than or equal to the time of the second table and then calculating aggregate values for rows grouped by source. However, I'm stumped about how to actually do this.
Here's my test table:
+------+------+------+
| time | source | temp |
+------+------+------+
| 1 | a | 20 |
| 1 | b | 18 |
| 1 | c | 23 |
| 2 | b | 21 |
| 2 | c | 20 |
| 2 | a | 18 |
| 3 | a | 16 |
| 3 | c | 13 |
| 4 | c | 15 |
| 4 | a | 4 |
| 4 | b | 31 |
| 5 | b | 10 |
| 5 | c | 16 |
| 5 | a | 22 |
| 6 | a | 18 |
| 6 | b | 17 |
| 7 | a | 20 |
| 7 | b | 19 |
+------+------+------+
INSERT INTO samples (time, source, temp) VALUES (1, 'a', 20), (1, 'b', 18), (1, 'c', 23), (2, 'b', 21), (2, 'c', 20), (2, 'a', 18), (3, 'a', 16), (3, 'c', 13), (4, 'c', 15), (4, 'a', 4), (4, 'b', 31), (5, 'b', 10), (5, 'c', 16), (5, 'a', 22), (6, 'a', 18), (6, 'b', 17), (7, 'a', 20), (7, 'b', 19);
To do my min, max and avg calculations, I want an intermediate table that looks like this:
+------+------+------+
| time | source | temp |
+------+------+------+
| 1 | a | 20 |
| 1 | b | 18 |
| 1 | c | 23 |
| 2 | b | 21 |
| 2 | c | 20 |
| 2 | a | 18 |
| 3 | a | 16 |
| 3 | b | 21 |
| 3 | c | 13 |
| 4 | c | 15 |
| 4 | a | 4 |
| 4 | b | 31 |
| 5 | b | 10 |
| 5 | c | 16 |
| 5 | a | 22 |
| 6 | a | 18 |
| 6 | b | 17 |
| 6 | c | 16 |
| 7 | a | 20 |
| 7 | b | 19 |
| 7 | c | 16 |
+------+------+------+
The following query is getting me close to what I want but it takes the temperature value of the source's first result, rather than the most recent one at the given time interval:
SELECT s.dt as sdt, s.mac, ss.temp, MAX(ss.dt) as maxdt FROM (SELECT DISTINCT dt FROM samples) AS s CROSS JOIN samples AS ss WHERE s.dt >= ss.dt GROUP BY sdt, mac HAVING maxdt <= s.dt ORDER BY sdt ASC, maxdt ASC;
+------+------+------+-------+
| sdt | mac | temp | maxdt |
+------+------+------+-------+
| 1 | a | 20 | 1 |
| 1 | c | 23 | 1 |
| 1 | b | 18 | 1 |
| 2 | a | 20 | 2 |
| 2 | c | 23 | 2 |
| 2 | b | 18 | 2 |
| 3 | b | 18 | 2 |
| 3 | a | 20 | 3 |
| 3 | c | 23 | 3 |
| 4 | a | 20 | 4 |
| 4 | c | 23 | 4 |
| 4 | b | 18 | 4 |
| 5 | a | 20 | 5 |
| 5 | c | 23 | 5 |
| 5 | b | 18 | 5 |
| 6 | c | 23 | 5 |
| 6 | a | 20 | 6 |
| 6 | b | 18 | 6 |
| 7 | c | 23 | 5 |
| 7 | b | 18 | 7 |
| 7 | a | 20 | 7 |
+------+------+------+-------+
Update: chadhoc (great name, by the way!) gives a nice solution that unfortunately does not work in MySQL, since it does not support the FULL JOIN
he uses. Luckily, I believe a simple UNION
is an effective replacement:
-- Unify the original samples with the missing values that we've calculated
(
SELECT time, source, temp
FROM samples
)
UNION
( -- Pull all the time/source combinations that we are missing from the sample set, along with the temp
-- from the last sampled interval for the same time/source combination if we do not have one
SELECT a.time, a.source, (SELECT t2.temp FROM samples AS t2 WHERE t2.time < a.time AND t2.source = a.source ORDER BY t2.time DESC LIMIT 1) AS temp
FROM
( -- All values we want to get should be a cross of time/temp
SELECT t1.time, s1.source
FROM
(SELECT DISTINCT time FROM samples) AS t1
CROSS JOIN
(SELECT DISTINCT source FROM samples) AS s1
) AS a
LEFT JOIN samples s
ON a.time = s.time
AND a.source = s.source
WHERE s.source IS NULL
)
ORDER BY time, source;
Update 2: MySQL gives the following EXPLAIN
output for chadhoc's code:
+----+--------------------+------------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+------+-----------------------------+
| id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra |
+----+--------------------+------------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+------+-----------------------------+
| 1 | PRIMARY | temp | ALL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | 18 | |
| 2 | UNION | <derived4> | ALL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | 21 | |
| 2 | UNION | s | ALL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | 18 | Using where |
| 4 | DERIVED | <derived6> | ALL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | 3 | |
| 4 | DERIVED | <derived5> | ALL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | 7 | |
| 6 | DERIVED | temp | ALL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | 18 | Using temporary |
| 5 | DERIVED | temp | ALL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | 18 | Using temporary |
| 3 | DEPENDENT SUBQUERY | t2 | ALL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | 18 | Using where; Using filesort |
| NULL | UNION RESULT | <union1,2> | ALL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | Using filesort |
+----+--------------------+------------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+------+-----------------------------+
I was able to get Charles' code working like so:
SELECT T.time, S.source,
COALESCE(
D.temp,
(
SELECT temp FROM samples
WHERE source = S.source AND time = (
SELECT MAX(time)
FROM samples
WHERE
source = S.source
AND time < T.time
)
)
) AS temp
FROM (SELECT DISTINCT time FROM samples) AS T
CROSS JOIN (SELECT DISTINCT source FROM samples) AS S
LEFT JOIN samples AS D
ON D.source = S.source AND D.time = T.time
Its explanation is:
+----+--------------------+------------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+------+-----------------+
| id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra |
+----+--------------------+------------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+------+-----------------+
| 1 | PRIMARY | <derived5> | ALL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | 3 | |
| 1 | PRIMARY | <derived4> | ALL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | 7 | |
| 1 | PRIMARY | D | ALL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | 18 | |
| 5 | DERIVED | temp | ALL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | 18 | Using temporary |
| 4 | DERIVED | temp | ALL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | 18 | Using temporary |
| 2 | DEPENDENT SUBQUERY | temp | ALL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | 18 | Using where |
| 3 | DEPENDENT SUBQUERY | temp | ALL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | 18 | Using where |
+----+--------------------+------------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+------+-----------------+
如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱,如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论,将不能在第一时间通知您!
发布评论
评论(2)
我认为使用 mySql 中的排名/窗口函数会获得更好的性能,但不幸的是我不知道这些以及 TSQL 实现。这是一个符合 ANSI 的解决方案,可以正常工作:
I think you'll get better performance making use of the ranking/windowing functions in mySql, but unfortunately I do not know those as well as the TSQL implementation. Here is an ANSI compliant solution that will work though:
我知道这看起来很复杂,但它的格式是为了解释自己......
它应该有效...希望您只有三个来源...如果您有任意数量的来源,则这将不起作用...在这种情况下,请参阅第二个查询...
编辑:删除第一次尝试
编辑:如果您提前不知道来源,则必须执行一些操作来创建“填充”缺失值的中间结果集。
像这样的东西:
第二次编辑:通过移动逻辑来检索每个源的最新临时读数从 Select 子句到 Join 条件,从而消除了对 Coalesce 的需要。
I know this looks complicated, but it's formatted to explain itself...
It should work... Hope you only have three sources... If you have an arbitrary number of sources than this won't work... In that case see the second query...
EDIT: Removed first attempt
EDIT: If you don't know the sources ahead of time, you'll have to do something where you create an intermediate result set that "Fills in" the missing values..
something like this:
2nd EDIT: Removed need for Coalesce by moving logic to retrieve most recent temp reading for each source from Select clause into the Join condition.