ISO 9241(人体系统交互的人体工程学)与行业相关吗?

发布于 2024-08-10 04:15:56 字数 1432 浏览 2 评论 0原文

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(2

吻风 2024-08-17 04:15:56

这是一本有用的读物​​,并且对 UI 有一定的适用性。但我不会费尽心思来验证申请。一般的经验法则是,不要浪费不会增加用户群及其满意度的努力。但正如我所说,有一些经验教训可以让您的用户受益,例如将相关功能放在附近等等。

It is a useful read, and has some applicability to UI. But I wouldn't go through the trouble to certify an application. General rule of thumb is don't waste efforts that won't increase user base and their satisfaction. But as I said there are lessons to be learned that will benefit your users such as placing related functioonality close by and suff like that.

风月客 2024-08-17 04:15:56

这取决于你对“行业”的理解。正如您所说,如果您有客户提出要求,那么您别无选择,否则您就无法获得合同。有一些“行业”,例如政府、电信、航空公司等,有充分的理由要求和支持此类标准。这些标准不仅仅是一些或多或少有趣的读物,而是定义了 UI 和人机交互的基本元素和模式。如果您为具有 UI 的应用程序或服务编写规范或 RFI,则无需定义每个方面,只需参考标准文档即可。对于承包商和承包商来说,这一点都非常明确。

It depends by what you mean with "the industry". If you have, as you say, a customer that demands it then you have no choice or you don't get the contract. There are a couple of "industries", e.g. government, telecommunication, airlines etc. that demand and support these kind of standards for a good reason. These standards are not just some more or less funny reads but define the basic elements and patterns for UIs and human-computer-interaction. If you write a specification or an RFI for an application or service that has a UI, you don't need to define each and every aspect but just refer to the standard document. This is very clear, both for the contractee as well as for the contractor.

~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文