Java有带反向查找功能的HashMap吗?

发布于 2024-08-10 02:09:52 字数 189 浏览 4 评论 0原文

我的数据以“键-键”格式组织,而不是“键-值”格式。它就像 HashMap,但我需要在两个方向上进行 O(1) 查找。这种类型的数据结构有名称吗?Java 的标准库中是否包含类似的内容? (或者也许是 Apache Commons?)

我可以编写自己的类,基本上使用两个镜像映射,但我不想重新发明轮子(如果这已经存在,但我只是没有寻找正确的术语)。

I have data that is organized in kind of a "key-key" format, rather than "key-value". It's like a HashMap, but I will need O(1) lookup in both directions. Is there a name for this type of data structure, and is anything like this included in Java's standard libraries? (or maybe Apache Commons?)

I could write my own class that basically uses two mirrored Maps, but I'd rather not reinvent the wheel (if this already exists but I'm just not searching for the right term).

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(7

对不⑦ 2024-08-17 02:09:53

Java API 中没有这样的类。您想要的 Apache Commons 类将成为 BidiMap

作为一名数学家,我将这种结构称为双射。

There is no such class in the Java API. The Apache Commons class you want is going to be one of the implementations of BidiMap.

As a mathematician, I would call this kind of structure a bijection.

玩心态 2024-08-17 02:09:53

除了 Apache Commons 之外,Guava 也有一个 BiMap

In addition to Apache Commons, Guava also has a BiMap.

知足的幸福 2024-08-17 02:09:53

这是我用来完成此任务的一个简单的类(我不想再有另一个第三方依赖项)。它不提供地图中可用的所有功能,但它是一个好的开始。

    public class BidirectionalMap<KeyType, ValueType>{
        private Map<KeyType, ValueType> keyToValueMap = new ConcurrentHashMap<KeyType, ValueType>();
        private Map<ValueType, KeyType> valueToKeyMap = new ConcurrentHashMap<ValueType, KeyType>();

        synchronized public void put(KeyType key, ValueType value){
            keyToValueMap.put(key, value);
            valueToKeyMap.put(value, key);
        }

        synchronized public ValueType removeByKey(KeyType key){
            ValueType removedValue = keyToValueMap.remove(key);
            valueToKeyMap.remove(removedValue);
            return removedValue;
        }

        synchronized public KeyType removeByValue(ValueType value){
            KeyType removedKey = valueToKeyMap.remove(value);
            keyToValueMap.remove(removedKey);
            return removedKey;
        }

        public boolean containsKey(KeyType key){
            return keyToValueMap.containsKey(key);
        }

        public boolean containsValue(ValueType value){
            return keyToValueMap.containsValue(value);
        }

        public KeyType getKey(ValueType value){
            return valueToKeyMap.get(value);
        }

        public ValueType get(KeyType key){
            return keyToValueMap.get(key);
        }
    }

Here is a simple class I used to get this done (I did not want to have yet another third party dependency). It does not offer all features available in Maps but it is a good start.

    public class BidirectionalMap<KeyType, ValueType>{
        private Map<KeyType, ValueType> keyToValueMap = new ConcurrentHashMap<KeyType, ValueType>();
        private Map<ValueType, KeyType> valueToKeyMap = new ConcurrentHashMap<ValueType, KeyType>();

        synchronized public void put(KeyType key, ValueType value){
            keyToValueMap.put(key, value);
            valueToKeyMap.put(value, key);
        }

        synchronized public ValueType removeByKey(KeyType key){
            ValueType removedValue = keyToValueMap.remove(key);
            valueToKeyMap.remove(removedValue);
            return removedValue;
        }

        synchronized public KeyType removeByValue(ValueType value){
            KeyType removedKey = valueToKeyMap.remove(value);
            keyToValueMap.remove(removedKey);
            return removedKey;
        }

        public boolean containsKey(KeyType key){
            return keyToValueMap.containsKey(key);
        }

        public boolean containsValue(ValueType value){
            return keyToValueMap.containsValue(value);
        }

        public KeyType getKey(ValueType value){
            return valueToKeyMap.get(value);
        }

        public ValueType get(KeyType key){
            return keyToValueMap.get(key);
        }
    }
↘人皮目录ツ 2024-08-17 02:09:53

如果没有发生冲突,您始终可以将两个方向添加到同一个 HashMap :-)

If no collisions occur, you can always add both directions to the same HashMap :-)

冷默言语 2024-08-17 02:09:53

这是我的 2 美分。

或者您可以使用带有泛型的简单方法。小菜一碟。

public static <K,V> Map<V, K> invertMap(Map<K, V> toInvert) {
    Map<V, K> result = new HashMap<V, K>();
    for(K k: toInvert.keySet()){
        result.put(toInvert.get(k), k);
    }
    return result;
}

当然,你必须有一张具有独特价值的地图。否则,将更换其中一名。

Here my 2 cents.

Or you can use a simple method with generics. Piece of cake.

public static <K,V> Map<V, K> invertMap(Map<K, V> toInvert) {
    Map<V, K> result = new HashMap<V, K>();
    for(K k: toInvert.keySet()){
        result.put(toInvert.get(k), k);
    }
    return result;
}

Of course you must have a map with unique values. Otherwise, one of them will be replaced.

彼岸花似海 2024-08-17 02:09:53

受到 GETah 的回答的启发,我决定自己写一些类似的东西,并进行一些改进:

  • 该类正在实现 Map< K,V>-Interface
  • 通过在通过 put 更改值时处理它,双向性确实得到了保证(至少我希望在此保证)

使用方式就像正常情况一样地图,要获取映射上的反向视图,请调用 getReverseView()。不复制内容,仅返回视图。

我不确定这是否完全万无一失(实际上,可能不是),所以如果您发现任何缺陷,请随时发表评论,我会更新答案。

public class BidirectionalMap<Key, Value> implements Map<Key, Value> {

    private final Map<Key, Value> map;
    private final Map<Value, Key> revMap;

    public BidirectionalMap() {
        this(16, 0.75f);
    }

    public BidirectionalMap(int initialCapacity) {
        this(initialCapacity, 0.75f);
    }

    public BidirectionalMap(int initialCapacity, float loadFactor) {
        this.map = new HashMap<>(initialCapacity, loadFactor);
        this.revMap = new HashMap<>(initialCapacity, loadFactor);
    }

    private BidirectionalMap(Map<Key, Value> map, Map<Value, Key> reverseMap) {
        this.map = map;
        this.revMap = reverseMap;
    }

    @Override
    public void clear() {
        map.clear();
        revMap.clear();
    }

    @Override
    public boolean containsKey(Object key) {
        return map.containsKey(key);
    }

    @Override
    public boolean containsValue(Object value) {
        return revMap.containsKey(value);
    }

    @Override
    public Set<java.util.Map.Entry<Key, Value>> entrySet() {
        return Collections.unmodifiableSet(map.entrySet());
    }

    @Override
    public boolean isEmpty() {
        return map.isEmpty();
    }

    @Override
    public Set<Key> keySet() {
        return Collections.unmodifiableSet(map.keySet());
    }

    @Override
    public void putAll(Map<? extends Key, ? extends Value> m) {
        m.entrySet().forEach(e -> put(e.getKey(), e.getValue()));
    }

    @Override
    public int size() {
        return map.size();
    }

    @Override
    public Collection<Value> values() {
        return Collections.unmodifiableCollection(map.values());
    }

    @Override
    public Value get(Object key) {
        return map.get(key);
    }

    @Override
    public Value put(Key key, Value value) {
        Value v = remove(key);
        getReverseView().remove(value);
        map.put(key, value);
        revMap.put(value, key);
        return v;
    }

    public Map<Value, Key> getReverseView() {
        return new BidirectionalMap<>(revMap, map);
    }

    @Override
    public Value remove(Object key) {
        if (containsKey(key)) {
            Value v = map.remove(key);
            revMap.remove(v);
            return v;
        } else {
            return null;
        }
    }

}

Inspired by GETah's answer I decided to write something similar by myself with some improvements:

  • The class is implementing the Map<K,V>-Interface
  • The bidirectionality is really guaranteed by taking care of it when changing a value by a put (at least I hope to guarantee it hereby)

Usage is just like a normal map, to get a reverse view on the mapping call getReverseView(). The content is not copied, only a view is returned.

I'm not sure this is totally fool-proof (actually, it's probably not), so feel free to comment if you notice any flaws and I'll update the answer.

public class BidirectionalMap<Key, Value> implements Map<Key, Value> {

    private final Map<Key, Value> map;
    private final Map<Value, Key> revMap;

    public BidirectionalMap() {
        this(16, 0.75f);
    }

    public BidirectionalMap(int initialCapacity) {
        this(initialCapacity, 0.75f);
    }

    public BidirectionalMap(int initialCapacity, float loadFactor) {
        this.map = new HashMap<>(initialCapacity, loadFactor);
        this.revMap = new HashMap<>(initialCapacity, loadFactor);
    }

    private BidirectionalMap(Map<Key, Value> map, Map<Value, Key> reverseMap) {
        this.map = map;
        this.revMap = reverseMap;
    }

    @Override
    public void clear() {
        map.clear();
        revMap.clear();
    }

    @Override
    public boolean containsKey(Object key) {
        return map.containsKey(key);
    }

    @Override
    public boolean containsValue(Object value) {
        return revMap.containsKey(value);
    }

    @Override
    public Set<java.util.Map.Entry<Key, Value>> entrySet() {
        return Collections.unmodifiableSet(map.entrySet());
    }

    @Override
    public boolean isEmpty() {
        return map.isEmpty();
    }

    @Override
    public Set<Key> keySet() {
        return Collections.unmodifiableSet(map.keySet());
    }

    @Override
    public void putAll(Map<? extends Key, ? extends Value> m) {
        m.entrySet().forEach(e -> put(e.getKey(), e.getValue()));
    }

    @Override
    public int size() {
        return map.size();
    }

    @Override
    public Collection<Value> values() {
        return Collections.unmodifiableCollection(map.values());
    }

    @Override
    public Value get(Object key) {
        return map.get(key);
    }

    @Override
    public Value put(Key key, Value value) {
        Value v = remove(key);
        getReverseView().remove(value);
        map.put(key, value);
        revMap.put(value, key);
        return v;
    }

    public Map<Value, Key> getReverseView() {
        return new BidirectionalMap<>(revMap, map);
    }

    @Override
    public Value remove(Object key) {
        if (containsKey(key)) {
            Value v = map.remove(key);
            revMap.remove(v);
            return v;
        } else {
            return null;
        }
    }

}
|煩躁 2024-08-17 02:09:53

这是一个相当老的问题,但是如果其他人像我一样有脑块,并且偶然发现了这个问题,希望这会有所帮助。

我也在寻找双向 HashMap,有时它是最有用的最简单的答案。

如果您不想重新发明轮子并且不想向您的项目添加其他库或项目,那么可以简单地实现并行数组(或 ArrayList,如果您的设计需要)。

SomeType[] keys1 = new SomeType[NUM_PAIRS];
OtherType[] keys2 = new OtherType[NUM_PAIRS];

一旦您知道两个键中 1 个的索引,您就可以轻松请求另一个键。因此,您的查找方法可能类似于:

SomeType getKey1(OtherType ot);
SomeType getKey1ByIndex(int key2Idx);
OtherType getKey2(SomeType st); 
OtherType getKey2ByIndex(int key2Idx);

假设您正在使用正确的面向对象结构,其中只有方法正在修改这些数组/ArrayList,保持它们并行将非常简单。对于 ArrayList 来说甚至更容易,因为如果数组的大小发生变化,只要同时添加/删除,就不必重建。

Quite an old question here, but if someone else has brain block like I just did and stumbles on this, hopefully this will help.

I too was looking for a bi-directional HashMap, sometimes it is the simplest of answers that are the most useful.

If you do not wish to re-invent the wheel and prefer not to add other libraries or projects to your project, how about a simple implementation of parallel arrays (or ArrayLists if your design demands it).

SomeType[] keys1 = new SomeType[NUM_PAIRS];
OtherType[] keys2 = new OtherType[NUM_PAIRS];

As soon as you know the index of 1 of the two keys you can easily request the other. So your lookup methods could looks something like:

SomeType getKey1(OtherType ot);
SomeType getKey1ByIndex(int key2Idx);
OtherType getKey2(SomeType st); 
OtherType getKey2ByIndex(int key2Idx);

This is assuming you are using proper object oriented structures, where only methods are modifying these arrays/ArrayLists, it would be very simple to keep them parallel. Even easier for an ArrayList since you would not have to rebuild if the size of the arrays change, so long as you add/remove in tandem.

~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文