对我来说，签署所有应用程序最经济有效的方式是什么？
在过去的几年里，我开发了相当多的共享软件程序，并在网上销售了 10 个左右，我注意到 Windows Vista 和 Windows 7，现在甚至我的 AV 扫描仪都会警告我我的程序未签名。那么，对我来说，签署众多安装程序的最实惠的方式是什么？我不想为每个程序付费，因为这会很昂贵，因为我开发了很多软件并将许多软件发布为免费软件。
谢谢 玉
I've developed quite a number of shareware programs over the last number of years and I sell 10 or so online, I've noticed with Windows Vista and Windows 7 and now even my AV scanner warns me my programs aren't signed. So what is the most affordable way for me to sign my many installers? I don't want to pay per program as this would be expensive as I develop a lot and post many as freeware.
Thanks
Jade
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（2）
刚刚检查了您可以购买代码签名证书的各种供应商的价格（价格代表从当地货币转换为美元的每年最佳价值）：
我之前为我贡献的开源软件研究过这个问题，认为我无法证明个人开支是合理的。
Just checked prices of various provides you can buy Code Signing Certificates from (prices represent best value per year converted from local currency to USD):
I looked into this before for the Open Source software I contribute to, decided I couldn't justify the personal expense.
一份 Verisign的代码签名证书每年费用为 500 美元（如果您购买多年租约，费用会少一些），并且不限制您在此期间执行的签名数量。您肯定可以从其他公司获得更便宜的在给定时间内无限使用的代码签名证书，例如我看到 instantssl“Comodo”以同样的 500 美元的价格为您提供 3 年的租赁，而 thawte 第一年费用为 300 美元，续订费用会少一些 - 然而，我对这些没有个人经验，我不知道如何那些数百美元的差异对你来说很重要，所以很难给出具体的建议，除了无限制使用证书似乎是标准方法这一事实之外（事实上，我什至不知道在哪里可以找到按次付费的证书）使用种类！-)
One Verisign's code-signing certificate costs $500 per year (a bit less if you buy a multi-year lease) and doesn't limit the number of signatures you perform during that time. You can surely get cheaper unlimited-use-within-given-time code-signing certificates from other firms, e.g. I see instantssl "Comodo" gives you a 3-years lease for the same $500, while thawte is $300 for the first year and a bit less to renew -- however, I have no personal experience with those, and I'm not sure how much those hundred-dollar differences matter to you, so it's hard to give specific advice, beyond the fact that an unlimited-use certificate seems to be the standard approach (indeed I wouldn't even know where to turn for a pay-per-use kind!-)