如何使用 ghci 在 lambda 中写入数字

发布于 2024-08-09 03:42:41 字数 238 浏览 3 评论 0原文

我是 Haskell 新手，使用 Ghci。

我有一个名为三的函数，我想将其写为

let three =  \x->(\y->(x(x(x y))))

“OK”，这可以工作，但是当我尝试时

three (2+) 4

它不起作用。相反，我收到一些“无法构造无限类型”错误。

请帮我。

原文

I am new to Haskell, using Ghci.

I have a function, called three, that I want to write as

let three =  \x->(\y->(x(x(x y))))

OK, this works, but when I try

three (2+) 4

It does not work. Instead, I get some "cannot construct infinite type" error.

Please help me.

分享到QQ

分享到微博

如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

发布评论

需要登录才能够评论，你可以免费注册一个本站的账号。

我为君王 2024-08-16 03:42:41

ghci> let three = \x->(\y->(x(x(x y))))
ghci> three (2+) 4
10
ghci> three return "deconstructivist"

<interactive>:1:6:
    Occurs check: cannot construct the infinite type: t = m t
      Expected type: t
      Inferred type: m t
    In the first argument of 'three', namely 'return'
    In the expression: three return "deconstructivist"
ghci> :t three
three :: (t -> t) -> t -> t
ghci> :t return
return :: (Monad m) => a -> m a

您提供的三 (2+) 4 示例有效！最好检查您提供的示例是否确实重现了您的问题。
至于另一个示例，例如上面的 return 示例，问题是 return 结果的类型与给定的类型不同。如果类型相同，它将是无限的（并且类型为 * -> * -> * -> ...），Haskell 不支持这种情况。

ghci> let three = \x->(\y->(x(x(x y))))
ghci> three (2+) 4
10
ghci> three return "deconstructivist"

<interactive>:1:6:
    Occurs check: cannot construct the infinite type: t = m t
      Expected type: t
      Inferred type: m t
    In the first argument of 'three', namely 'return'
    In the expression: three return "deconstructivist"
ghci> :t three
three :: (t -> t) -> t -> t
ghci> :t return
return :: (Monad m) => a -> m a

The example you supplied of three (2+) 4, works! Better check that the examples you provide actually reproduce your problem.
As for with a different example, like the one above with return, the thing is that return results in a different type than the one given. If the type was the same, it would be infinite (and of kind * -> * -> * -> ...), which Haskell does not support.

回复收藏 0 原文

著墨染雨君画夕 2024-08-16 03:42:41

你给出的例子确实有效。让我们解释一下原因：

three f = f . f . f
-- so...
three :: (a -> a) -> a -> a

该函数需要具有类型 a -> a 因为它将接收它自己的参数，这需要一个类型。 (2+) 的类型为 Num a =>;一个-> a，所以三 (2+) 4 就可以正常工作。

但是，当您传递 return 等类型为 Monad m => 的函数时，一个-> m a，它返回不同的类型，它与我们设定的(a -> a)要求不匹配。这就是你的函数将在何时何地失败的地方。

当你这样做时，尝试创建一个类似 doTimes 的函数，其类型为 Integer ->; (a->a)->一个-> a 执行给定的函数给定的次数 - 这是创建此函数后的一个很好的下一步。

The example you give does work. Let's explain why:

three f = f . f . f
-- so...
three :: (a -> a) -> a -> a

The function needs to have type a -> a because it will receive it's own argument, which requires a type. (2+) has type Num a => a -> a, so three (2+) 4 will work just fine.

However, when you pass a function like return of type Monad m => a -> m a, which returns a different type, it will not match the (a -> a) requirement we set out. This is where and when your function will fail.

While you're at it, try making a function like doTimes with type Integer -> (a -> a) -> a -> a which does the given function the given number of times - it's a good next step after making this function.

回复收藏 0 原文

~没有更多了~