在 C# 中为字符串分配双引号的最易读的方法
还有其他人认为在非常短的字符串中转义字符会使它们不太可读吗？我注意到我在代码中使用 s = "\"" 为字符串分配双引号，但经过思考，我想出了以下替代方案： s = '" '.ToString()。
- 我的替代方案好吗？您希望看到代码中的第一个版本吗？
- 如何将两个双引号 ("")（可能是
s = "\"\""）分配给字符串？
/我在被迫进入该 CW 之前正在对其进行标记。
Does anyone else think that escaping characters in very short strings make them not very readable? I noticed I was using s = "\"" in my code to assign a double quote a string, but having thought about it, I came up with the following alternative: s = '"'.ToString().
- Is my alternative any good? Would you prefer see the first version in code?
- How would you go about assigning two double quotes (""), which might be
s = "\"\"", to a string?
/me is marking this CW before being pressured into it.
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（2）
你可以使用：
或者如果你喜欢迷惑人们：
但实际上我仍然更喜欢老式的转义：\"
You could use:
or if you like to confuse people:
but actually I still prefer the good-old-fashioned escape: \"
我不确定替代方案是否更具可读性，相反它令人困惑。此外，使用函数调用在源代码中获得不同的外观没有多大意义 - 我什至会说这是不好的做法。
恕我直言，老式的转义序列是最好的选择。
I'm not sure the alternative is more readable, on the contrary it's confusing. Besides, using a function call to have a different look in the source code doesn't make much sense - I would even say it's bad practice.
The old-fashioned escape sequence is the best option IMHO.