简要编辑可用性
在 1990 年代，我使用了一个很棒的编辑器，名为 Brief。但最近我在 Visual Studio 编辑器中使用 Brief 模拟器模式，但我不满意。
Brief编辑器的一个主要优点是，它没有任何滚动条和菜单项，我可以充分使用我的屏幕。而且窗户隔板也非常纤薄。
我的问题： 那些曾经是Brief粉丝的家伙们，在DOS版本消亡之后，哪个编辑器更类似于Brief的DOS版本？
注意：当我在 Windows 中编辑时，这个问题很明显。我也有一些如何学会在 Linux 中使用 vi 的方法。
In the 1990's I used a wonderful editor called Brief. But recently I am using the Brief emulator mode inside the Visual Studio editor and I am not satisfied.
The one main advantage of the Brief editor was, it did not have any scroll bars, and menu items, and I could use my screen fully. And the window separator was also very slim.
My question:
Those guys/gals who used to be fans of Brief, after the DOS version died, which editor resembles the DOS version of Brief better?
Note: This problem is pronounced when I am editing in Windows. And I have some how learnt to use vi in Linux.
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（6）
zeusedit.com/" rel="noreferrer">Zeus编辑器有一个Brief仿真模式，但作为Zeus的作者，我可能有点偏见。
另一方面，一些Zeus 用户认为Zeus 是一个更好的Brief比简短。
The Zeus editor has a Brief emulation mode, but as the author of Zeus, I might be a little biased.
On the other hand, some Zeus users think Zeus is a better Brief than Brief.
只是一个建议：如果您已经了解 Vi（或 Vim），为什么不在 Windows 上使用它呢？ Windows 版本的 Vim 非常出色。 Visual Studio 有一个 Vim 插件 (ViEmu)，因此您可以在任何地方使用 Vim。我发现能够对所有任务使用相同的编辑命令非常有用。
Just a suggestion: If you already know Vi (or Vim) why don't you use that on Windows as well? The Windows version of Vim is excellent. There's a Vim plugin (ViEmu) for Visual Studio, so you can use Vim all over the place. I find it very useful to be able to use the same editing commands for all my tasks.
我仍然偶尔会进入我的 DOS-BRIEF，只是为了纯粹的怀旧之情:-)
我现在使用 EMACS。这些命令需要更多的击键，但我已经拥有了 Brief 提供的几乎所有内容。通过适当的配置，EMACS 也不会妨碍您。
如果您喜欢使用 Brief，我想您也会喜欢 EMACS。这两位编辑器背后的哲学有一些吸引我的地方——每个功能都经过深思熟虑、可定制性、强大的功能。
您可以在 EMACS 中找到简短的内容，而在许多其他编辑器中找不到：
1.列块剪切/复制/粘贴
2. 文件名补全/文件夹列表，无需打开对话框/窗口
3.直观的导航
4. 更多文本操作
5. 编辑器内编译和调试（尽管这通常要让正常工作有点痛苦）
6. 分割缓冲区
7. 缓冲区列表
8. 多用键盘完成工作，少依赖鼠标
9.强大的宏
10.强大的正则表达式搜索/替换，极速搜索
11. 强大的脚本语言与编译
还有更多...
您甚至可以隐藏滚动条:-)
您可能会错过的一件事是数字键减号和del键用于剪切/删除，ins用于粘贴。 （如果您使用笔记本电脑，这不会成为问题，因为在笔记本电脑上获取这些键比 EMACS 的默认键绑定要困难得多）。如果您确实愿意，您可以配置 EMACS 键绑定来处理此问题。我使用脚本在像BRIEF这样的单个操作中获取线标记/剪切，与EMACS的默认行为不同，EMACS的默认行为是用一个命令标记线，然后用另一个命令剪切它。
不过有一点警告。有了 Brief，您可以在一周内开始提高工作效率。 EMACS 需要做的工作比这多得多，但我发现这是值得的。
我喜欢 EMACS 的另一个关键点是它几乎可以在所有操作系统上使用。我使用装有 Mac OS X 和 Windows XP 的 MacBook。我也偶尔使用 Ubuntu Linux。 EMACS 随处可用，在这些操作系统之间切换时我不必停下来思考任何事情。
希望这有帮助。
I still drop into my DOS-BRIEF once in a while just for the sheer nostalgia of it :-)
I use EMACS now. The commands require more keystrokes but I have pretty much everything in it that BRIEF gave me. With the right amount of configuration, EMACS stays out of your way too.
If you loved working with BRIEF, I think you will like EMACS. There's something about the philosophy behind the two editors that appeals to me - the amount of thought that has gone into each feature, the customizability, the sheer power.
BRIEF stuff you will find in EMACS, and not in many other editors:
1. Column block cut/copy/paste
2. Filename completion / folder listing without opening a dialog / window
3. Intuitive navigation
4. Way more text manipulation stuff
5. In-editor compilation and debugging (although this is usually a bit more painful to get working right)
6. Split buffers
7. Buffer list
8. Get stuff done with the keyboard more, and depend on the mouse less
9. Powerful macros
10. Powerful regular-expression search / replace, speed search
11. Powerful scripting language with compilation
And a whole lot more...
You can even hide the scrollbars :-)
The one thing you will likely miss is Num-key minus and del keys for cut / delete, ins for paste. (If you use a notebook, this won't be a problem anyway since getting at these keys on a notebook would be way more difficult than EMACS' default key bindings). And you could configure EMACS key-bindings to handle this if you really want to. I've used scripting to get line mark/cut in a single operation like BRIEF and unlike EMACS' default behavior which is you mark the line with one command and then cut it with another.
One word of warning though. With BRIEF you could start being productive in a week. EMACS needs way lot more work than that but I've found it worth it.
The other key thing I like about EMACS is that it is available on pretty much every operating system out there. I use a MacBook with Mac OS X and Windows XP. I also occasionally use Ubuntu Linux. EMACS is available everywhere and I don't have to stop and think about anything when switching between these OS'.
Hope this helps.
我也是Brief的粉丝之一。如果您觉得Brief满意TsePRO适合您。
如果您有一些自己的 Brief 脚本 Crisp 甚至脚本也应该完全相同。对我来说，我一直在使用 FTE 并且我完全可以将其配置为 Brief 样式。 FTE 可在 DOS 和 Linux 上使用...
I am also one of the Brief fans. If you feel Brief is satisfied TsePRO is suited for you.
If you have some of your own Brief scripts Crisp should totally same even the script. For me I've been using FTE and I can totally configure it as Brief style even more. FTE is available both on DOS and Linux ...
Visual SlickEdit 有一个简短的模拟模式——我已经使用它很多年了。
Visual SlickEdit has a Brief emulation mode -- I've been using it for years.
看看 CodeWright 对 Brief 的模拟，它从 Brief 停止的地方开始。作为一名全职程序员，这是非常值得的。免费试用 30 天。
罗伊斯·史密斯
Look at CodeWright's emulation of Brief, it starts where Brief leaves off. Being a full time programmer it is well worth the cost. Try it for 30 days free.
Royce Smith