C++覆盖/过载问题
我在 C++ 中遇到一个问题:
#include <iostream>
class A
{
protected:
void some_func(const unsigned int& param1)
{
std::cout << "A::some_func(" << param1 << ")" << std::endl;
}
public:
virtual ~A() {}
virtual void some_func(const unsigned int& param1, const char*)
{
some_func(param1);
}
};
class B : public A
{
public:
virtual ~B() {}
virtual void some_func(const unsigned int& param1, const char*)
{
some_func(param1);
}
};
int main(int, char**)
{
A* t = new B();
t->some_func(21, "some char*");
return 0;
}
我使用的是 g++ 4.0.1 且编译错误:
$ g++ -W -Wall -Werror test.cc
test.cc: In member function ‘virtual void B::some_func(const unsigned int&, const char*)’:
test.cc:24: error: no matching function for call to ‘B::some_func(const unsigned int&)’
test.cc:22: note: candidates are: virtual void B::some_func(const unsigned int&, const char*)
为什么我必须指定 B 类中对 some_func(param1) 的调用是 A::some_func(param1) ?这是一个 g++ bug 还是来自 g++ 的随机消息,以防止出现我看不到的特殊情况?
I'm facing a problem in C++ :
#include <iostream>
class A
{
protected:
void some_func(const unsigned int& param1)
{
std::cout << "A::some_func(" << param1 << ")" << std::endl;
}
public:
virtual ~A() {}
virtual void some_func(const unsigned int& param1, const char*)
{
some_func(param1);
}
};
class B : public A
{
public:
virtual ~B() {}
virtual void some_func(const unsigned int& param1, const char*)
{
some_func(param1);
}
};
int main(int, char**)
{
A* t = new B();
t->some_func(21, "some char*");
return 0;
}
I'm using g++ 4.0.1 and the compilation error :
$ g++ -W -Wall -Werror test.cc
test.cc: In member function ‘virtual void B::some_func(const unsigned int&, const char*)’:
test.cc:24: error: no matching function for call to ‘B::some_func(const unsigned int&)’
test.cc:22: note: candidates are: virtual void B::some_func(const unsigned int&, const char*)
Why do I must specify that the call of some_func(param1) in class B is A::some_func(param1) ? Is it a g++ bug or a random message from g++ to prevent special cases I don't see ?
如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱,如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论,将不能在第一时间通知您!
发布评论
评论(1)
问题在于,在派生类中,您隐藏了基类中的受保护方法。您可以执行以下操作:完全限定派生对象中的受保护方法,或者使用 using 指令将该方法引入作用域:
The problem is that in the derived class you are hiding the protected method in the base class. You can do a couple of things, either you fully qualify the protected method in the derived object or else you bring that method into scope with a using directive: