validates_uniqueness_of 传递 nil 或空白(没有allow_nil 和allow_blank)

发布于 2024-08-06 01:42:41 字数 2353 浏览 3 评论 0原文

ActiveRecord 的唯一性验证器有一个选项可以跳过验证,如果值为 nil 或空白。即使我将两个参数设置为 true(默认行为),我也可以在验证命中之前创建一条包含 nil 和空白的记录。我使用默认的 SQlite3 数据库 sqlite3-ruby (1.2.5)。

编辑以澄清:如果将 validates_presence_of 添加到模型,我会得到预期的结果。我认为 validates_uniqueness_of 的默认行为会让这个变得多余。

测试用例:

rails validation_test
cd validation_test/
script/generate Model Thing identification:string
rake db:migrate

app/models/thing.rb 的内容:

class Thing < ActiveRecord::Base
  validates_uniqueness_of :identification
end

Rails 控制台:

script/console 
Loading development environment (Rails 2.3.4)
>> Thing.create!
=> #<Thing id: 1, identification: nil, created_at: "2009-09-26 01:49:32", updated_at: "2009-09-26 01:49:32">
>> Thing.create! :identification => ""
=> #<Thing id: 2, identification: "", created_at: "2009-09-26 01:49:42", updated_at: "2009-09-26 01:49:42">
>> Thing.create! :identification => ""
ActiveRecord::RecordInvalid: Validation failed: Identification has already been taken
    from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.4/lib/active_record/validations.rb:1090:in `save_without_dirty!'
    from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.4/lib/active_record/dirty.rb:87:in `save_without_transactions!'
    from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.4/lib/active_record/transactions.rb:200:in `save!'
    from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.4/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract/database_statements.rb:136:in `transaction'
    from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.4/lib/active_record/transactions.rb:182:in `transaction'
    from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.4/lib/active_record/transactions.rb:200:in `save!'
    from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.4/lib/active_record/transactions.rb:208:in `rollback_active_record_state!'
    from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.4/lib/active_record/transactions.rb:200:in `save!'
    from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.4/lib/active_record/validations.rb:1059:in `create!'
    from (irb):3
>> Thing.count
=> 2

为什么前两个创建会通过?

谢谢

The uniqueness validator of ActiveRecord has an options to skip validation if the value is nil or blank. Even if I set both parameters to true (the default behaviour) I can create one record with nil and blank before the validation hits. I use the default SQlite3 Database sqlite3-ruby (1.2.5).

Edit for clarification: I get the expected result if I add validates_presence_of to the Model. I thought that the default behaviour of validates_uniqueness_of would make this redundant.

Testcase:

rails validation_test
cd validation_test/
script/generate Model Thing identification:string
rake db:migrate

Content of app/models/thing.rb:

class Thing < ActiveRecord::Base
  validates_uniqueness_of :identification
end

Rails console:

script/console 
Loading development environment (Rails 2.3.4)
>> Thing.create!
=> #<Thing id: 1, identification: nil, created_at: "2009-09-26 01:49:32", updated_at: "2009-09-26 01:49:32">
>> Thing.create! :identification => ""
=> #<Thing id: 2, identification: "", created_at: "2009-09-26 01:49:42", updated_at: "2009-09-26 01:49:42">
>> Thing.create! :identification => ""
ActiveRecord::RecordInvalid: Validation failed: Identification has already been taken
    from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.4/lib/active_record/validations.rb:1090:in `save_without_dirty!'
    from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.4/lib/active_record/dirty.rb:87:in `save_without_transactions!'
    from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.4/lib/active_record/transactions.rb:200:in `save!'
    from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.4/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract/database_statements.rb:136:in `transaction'
    from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.4/lib/active_record/transactions.rb:182:in `transaction'
    from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.4/lib/active_record/transactions.rb:200:in `save!'
    from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.4/lib/active_record/transactions.rb:208:in `rollback_active_record_state!'
    from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.4/lib/active_record/transactions.rb:200:in `save!'
    from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.4/lib/active_record/validations.rb:1059:in `create!'
    from (irb):3
>> Thing.count
=> 2

Why do the first two creations pass?

Thanks

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(3

霊感 2024-08-13 01:42:42

您对默认行为有误解。来自文档

:allow_nil - 如果设置为 true,则在属性为 nil 时跳过此验证(默认为 false)。
:allow_blank - 如果设置为 true,则在属性为空时跳过此验证(默认为 false,它也包含 nil)。

allow_blank 设置为 true,我在 Rails 2.3.4 中看到以下行为。

class Thing < ActiveRecord::Base
  validates_uniqueness_of :identification, :allow_blank => true
end

>> Thing.create! :identification => ""
=> #<Thing id: 6, identification: "", created_at: "2009-09-26 03:09:48", updated_at: "2009-09-26 03:09:48">
>> Thing.create! :identification => ""
=> #<Thing id: 7, identification: "", created_at: "2009-09-26 03:09:49", updated_at: "2009-09-26 03:09:49">
>> Thing.create! :identification => nil
=> #<Thing id: 8, identification: nil, created_at: "2009-09-26 03:09:52", updated_at: "2009-09-26 03:09:52">
>> Thing.create! :identification => nil
=> #<Thing id: 9, identification: nil, created_at: "2009-09-26 03:09:53", updated_at: "2009-09-26 03:09:53">

编辑:进行澄清。

添加 validates_presence_of 对于您想要执行的操作来说是正确的。它不是多余的,因为它正在检查完全不同的错误情况。它还有自己的错误消息,这对用户来说很重要。

class Thing < ActiveRecord::Base
  validates_uniqueness_of :identification, :allow_blank => true
  validates_presence_of :identification
end

You are mistaken about the default behavior. From the docs:

:allow_nil - If set to true, skips this validation if the attribute is nil (default is false).
:allow_blank - If set to true, skips this validation if the attribute is blank (default is false, it includes nil too).

Setting allow_blank to true, I see the following behavior with Rails 2.3.4.

class Thing < ActiveRecord::Base
  validates_uniqueness_of :identification, :allow_blank => true
end

>> Thing.create! :identification => ""
=> #<Thing id: 6, identification: "", created_at: "2009-09-26 03:09:48", updated_at: "2009-09-26 03:09:48">
>> Thing.create! :identification => ""
=> #<Thing id: 7, identification: "", created_at: "2009-09-26 03:09:49", updated_at: "2009-09-26 03:09:49">
>> Thing.create! :identification => nil
=> #<Thing id: 8, identification: nil, created_at: "2009-09-26 03:09:52", updated_at: "2009-09-26 03:09:52">
>> Thing.create! :identification => nil
=> #<Thing id: 9, identification: nil, created_at: "2009-09-26 03:09:53", updated_at: "2009-09-26 03:09:53">

Edit: Addressing your clarification.

Adding a validates_presence_of would be correct for what you're trying to do. It's not redundant, since it's checking for a completely different error case. It also has its own error message, which will be important for the user.

class Thing < ActiveRecord::Base
  validates_uniqueness_of :identification, :allow_blank => true
  validates_presence_of :identification
end
一念一轮回 2024-08-13 01:42:42

并使用验证

validates :email, uniqueness: { allow_blank: true }
# or
validates :email, uniqueness: { allow_nil: true }

and with validates:

validates :email, uniqueness: { allow_blank: true }
# or
validates :email, uniqueness: { allow_nil: true }
萌无敌 2024-08-13 01:42:42
class Thing < ActiveRecord::Base
  validates :identification, uniqueness: true, allow_nil: true
end
class Thing < ActiveRecord::Base
  validates :identification, uniqueness: true, allow_nil: true
end
~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文