表达式的 ANTLR 语法

发布于 2024-08-05 11:24:29 字数 1347 浏览 3 评论 0原文

我正在尝试实现一个表达式处理语法(处理嵌套括号和其他内容)。到目前为止,我有以下内容,但它们无法处理某些情况(成功/失败的情况出现在以下代码块之后)。有人知道发生了什么事吗?

注意:varname +=varname = 内容只是 XText 中的一些附加 AST 生成帮助程序内容。暂时不用担心他们。

...

NilExpression returns Expression:
  'nil';

FalseExpression returns Expression:
  'false';

TrueExpression returns Expression:
  'true';

NumberExpression returns Expression:
  value=Number;

StringExpression returns Expression:
  value=STRING; //EllipsesExpression: '...';
//FunctionExpression: function=function; //don't allow random functions


UnaryExpression:
  op=unop ('(' expr=Expression ')')|expr=Expression;

BinaryExpression:
  'or'? AndOp; //or op

AndOp:
  'and'? ComparisonOp;

ComparisonOp:
  ('>'|'<'|'>='|'<='|'=='|'~=')? ConcatOp;

ConcatOp:
  '..'? AddSubOp;

AddSubOp:
  ('+' '-')? MultDivOp;

MultDivOp:
  ('*' '/')? ExpOp;

ExpOp:
  '^'? (('(' expr=Expression ')')|expr=Expression);

ExprSideOne : Variable|NilExpression|FalseExpression|TrueExpression|
  NumberExpression|StringExpression|UnaryExpression;

Expression:
  ( 
   '('
  expression1=ExprSideOne expression2+=BinaryExpression*
   ')' 
  )
  |
  ( expression1=ExprSideOne expression2+=BinaryExpression* )
;
...

这是解析/失败的列表:

c = ((b)); //fails
c = ((a not b)); //fails
c = b; //parses
d = (b); //parses

I'm trying to implement a expression handling grammar (that deals with nested parenthesis and stuff). I have the following so far, but they can't deal with some cases (successful/failure cases appear after the following code block). Anyone know what's going on?

Note: The varname += and varname = stuff are just some additional AST generation helper stuff in XText. Don't worry about them for now.

...

NilExpression returns Expression:
  'nil';

FalseExpression returns Expression:
  'false';

TrueExpression returns Expression:
  'true';

NumberExpression returns Expression:
  value=Number;

StringExpression returns Expression:
  value=STRING; //EllipsesExpression: '...';
//FunctionExpression: function=function; //don't allow random functions


UnaryExpression:
  op=unop ('(' expr=Expression ')')|expr=Expression;

BinaryExpression:
  'or'? AndOp; //or op

AndOp:
  'and'? ComparisonOp;

ComparisonOp:
  ('>'|'<'|'>='|'<='|'=='|'~=')? ConcatOp;

ConcatOp:
  '..'? AddSubOp;

AddSubOp:
  ('+' '-')? MultDivOp;

MultDivOp:
  ('*' '/')? ExpOp;

ExpOp:
  '^'? (('(' expr=Expression ')')|expr=Expression);

ExprSideOne : Variable|NilExpression|FalseExpression|TrueExpression|
  NumberExpression|StringExpression|UnaryExpression;

Expression:
  ( 
   '('
  expression1=ExprSideOne expression2+=BinaryExpression*
   ')' 
  )
  |
  ( expression1=ExprSideOne expression2+=BinaryExpression* )
;
...

And here's the list of parses/fails:

c = ((b)); //fails
c = ((a not b)); //fails
c = b; //parses
d = (b); //parses

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(3

<逆流佳人身旁 2024-08-12 11:24:29

发生的事情是您的表达式/表达式支持单括号,但不支持多个括号(正如您得出的结论)。我没有 ANTLR 的具体经验,但我使用过 Javacc,它有许多相似的概念(我为 Prolog 编写了语法......不要问)。

要处理嵌套括号,通常需要类似以下内容:

ParenthesisExpression: '(' (ParenthesisExpression | Expression) ')';

这意味着表达式要么包含在括号中,要么只是一个原始表达式。至于 AST 如何处理这个问题,ParenthesisExpression“是一个”表达式,因此它可以表示为子类或实现(如果表达式是某种接口/抽象类)。

What's going on is that your Expression/Expressions support single parentheses but not multiple parentheses (as you concluded). I don't have ANTLR specific experience but I've worked with Javacc which shares many similar concepts (I wrote a grammar for Prolog... don't ask).

To handle nested parentheses, you typically have something similar to:

ParenthesisExpression: '(' (ParenthesisExpression | Expression) ')';

This would mean that the expression is either wrapped in parentheses or it's just a raw expression. As for how the AST deals with this, a ParenthesisExpression 'is a' Expression, so it can be represented as a subclass or an implementation of (if Expression is an interface/abstract class of sorts).

命比纸薄 2024-08-12 11:24:29

使用位于标记/规则名称之后^对于定义表达式非常有用。

    expression :    e1 (OR^ e1)* ;
    e1  :   e2 (AND^ e2)*;
    e2  :   e3 (PIPE^ e3)*;
    e3  :   e4 (ANDSYMB^ e4)*;
    e4  :   e5 ((EQUAL^|NOTEQUAL^) e5)*;
    e5  :   e6 ((LESS^|GREATER^) e6)*;
    e6  :   e7 ((PLUS^|MINUS^) e7)* ;
    e7  :   e8 ((STAR^|SLASH^) e8)* ;
    e8  :   e9 (NEW^ ID LPAREN RPAREN)*;
    e9  :   (NOT^)? e10;
    e10 :   e11 | call_def;
    e11 :   constant 
        | '(' expression ')' -> expression;

Make use of the ^ placed after the token/rule name is very useful for defining expressions.

    expression :    e1 (OR^ e1)* ;
    e1  :   e2 (AND^ e2)*;
    e2  :   e3 (PIPE^ e3)*;
    e3  :   e4 (ANDSYMB^ e4)*;
    e4  :   e5 ((EQUAL^|NOTEQUAL^) e5)*;
    e5  :   e6 ((LESS^|GREATER^) e6)*;
    e6  :   e7 ((PLUS^|MINUS^) e7)* ;
    e7  :   e8 ((STAR^|SLASH^) e8)* ;
    e8  :   e9 (NEW^ ID LPAREN RPAREN)*;
    e9  :   (NOT^)? e10;
    e10 :   e11 | call_def;
    e11 :   constant 
        | '(' expression ')' -> expression;
白云悠悠 2024-08-12 11:24:29

我将这个语法用于简单的表达式:
http://fisheye2.atlassian .com/browse/~raw,r=5175/antlr-examples/C/polydiff/Poly.g

我还使用了该项目中包含的语法来实现更复杂的表达式:
http://www.codeproject.com/KB/recipes/sota_expression_evaluator.aspx

I've used this grammar for simple expressions:
http://fisheye2.atlassian.com/browse/~raw,r=5175/antlr-examples/C/polydiff/Poly.g

I've also used the grammar contain in this project for more complex expressions:
http://www.codeproject.com/KB/recipes/sota_expression_evaluator.aspx

~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文