Is there even an accepted interpretation for what the LGPL means when applied to binary assets like an icon? It's pretty clearly geared for source code, which is the reason a lot of the Creative Commons licenses came about.
Without knowing the answer(s) to the above, I'd say you could create an "About" screen that contained the appropriate copyright acknowledgements, and host the modified versions of the icons on a public web page that is linked from the about screen.
发布评论
评论（1）
当 LGPL 应用于图标等二元资产时，是否有一个公认的解释？它非常明显地适合源代码，这就是许多知识共享许可证出现的原因。
在不知道上述答案的情况下，我想说您可以创建一个包含适当版权声明的“关于”屏幕，并将图标的修改版本托管在从“关于”屏幕链接的公共网页上。
Is there even an accepted interpretation for what the LGPL means when applied to binary assets like an icon? It's pretty clearly geared for source code, which is the reason a lot of the Creative Commons licenses came about.
Without knowing the answer(s) to the above, I'd say you could create an "About" screen that contained the appropriate copyright acknowledgements, and host the modified versions of the icons on a public web page that is linked from the about screen.