AS3 动态类动态方法名称

发布于 2024-08-04 06:07:37 字数 874 浏览 3 评论 0原文

我显然在这里遗漏了一些东西。

我需要从数组中填充动态 AS3 类的方法(请参见下面的愚蠢示例)。

但是当我调用这些方法时,它们看起来都是同一个方法。在下面的示例中,所有方法都是 foobar1

如果我手动创建方法,没有循环,一切都很好。

有什么线索吗?

  package foo
  {
    public class Bar
    {
      public function testDynamicClassSanity():void
      {
        var foo:Foo = new Foo();
        var methods:Object = { foobar1: 101, foobar2: 201, foobar3: 301 };

        for (var key:String in methods)
        {
          var val:Number = methods[key];
          foo[key] = function():Number
          {
            return val;
          };
        }

        // Next trace prints
        // 101 = 101 201 = 101 301 = 101
        trace(
            101, "=", foo.foobar1(),
            201, "=", foo.foobar2(),
            301, "=", foo.foobar3()
          );
      }
    }
  }

  internal dynamic class Foo
  {
  };

I'm clearly missing something here.

I need to fill methods of dynamic AS3 class from an array (see silly example below).

But when I call those methods, all of them appear to be the same method. In the example below, all methods are foobar1.

If I create methods by hand, without a loop, everything is fine.

Any clues?

  package foo
  {
    public class Bar
    {
      public function testDynamicClassSanity():void
      {
        var foo:Foo = new Foo();
        var methods:Object = { foobar1: 101, foobar2: 201, foobar3: 301 };

        for (var key:String in methods)
        {
          var val:Number = methods[key];
          foo[key] = function():Number
          {
            return val;
          };
        }

        // Next trace prints
        // 101 = 101 201 = 101 301 = 101
        trace(
            101, "=", foo.foobar1(),
            201, "=", foo.foobar2(),
            301, "=", foo.foobar3()
          );
      }
    }
  }

  internal dynamic class Foo
  {
  };

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(3

惜醉颜 2024-08-11 06:07:37

我猜想问题出在 val 的作用域上——你假设它的作用域是 for 循环,但在 AS3 中情况并非如此,作用域是函数。您的所有呼叫都返回 301,我这样说对吗?

更新:由于解决您遇到的问题(变量 val 被引用并且稍后才解决,而不是被“复制”到您的函数中)非常麻烦:根据您的用例,您可以检查该方法调用并使用 代理

I would guess the problem is in the scoping of val -- you assume its scope is the for loop, but that is not the case in AS3, the scope is the function. Am I correct that all your calls return 301?

Update: As working around the issue that you are experiencing (the variable val being referenced and only later resolved instead of being 'copied' into your function) is quite cumbersome: Depending on your use case you could inspect the method calls and just look up the desired result in the table using the functionality provided by Proxy.

勿忘初心 2024-08-11 06:07:37

我认为你的问题是 var 变量的范围。尝试这个修改:(

for (var key:String in methods)
{
  var val:Number = methods[key];
  foo[key] = function (valInternal:Number) {
    return function():Number
    {
        return valInternal;
    };
  }(val);
}

上面的技巧在 Javascript 中可以解决类似的问题......我打赌它适用于 AS3)

I think that your problem is the scoping of the var variable. Try this modification:

for (var key:String in methods)
{
  var val:Number = methods[key];
  foo[key] = function (valInternal:Number) {
    return function():Number
    {
        return valInternal;
    };
  }(val);
}

(the above trick works in Javascript to workaround a similar problem... I bet it is applicable to AS3)

一场春暖 2024-08-11 06:07:37

作为记录,我将在此处发布 testDynamicClassSanity() 函数的更正版本:

    public function testDynamicClassSanity():void
    {
      var foo:Foo = new Foo();
      var methods:Object = { foobar1: 101, foobar2: 201, foobar3: 301 };

      // We have to introduce new scope
      var makeCallback:Function = function(result:Number):Function
      {
        return function():Number
        {
          return result;
        }
      }

      for (var key:String in methods)
      {
        foo[key] = makeCallback(methods[key])
      }

      // Prints as intended
      // 101 = 101 201 = 201 301 = 301
      trace(
          101, "=", foo.foobar1(),
          201, "=", foo.foobar2(),
          301, "=", foo.foobar3()
        );
     }

For the records, I'll post here the corrected version of the testDynamicClassSanity() function:

    public function testDynamicClassSanity():void
    {
      var foo:Foo = new Foo();
      var methods:Object = { foobar1: 101, foobar2: 201, foobar3: 301 };

      // We have to introduce new scope
      var makeCallback:Function = function(result:Number):Function
      {
        return function():Number
        {
          return result;
        }
      }

      for (var key:String in methods)
      {
        foo[key] = makeCallback(methods[key])
      }

      // Prints as intended
      // 101 = 101 201 = 201 301 = 301
      trace(
          101, "=", foo.foobar1(),
          201, "=", foo.foobar2(),
          301, "=", foo.foobar3()
        );
     }
~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文