优化 Dijkstra 以获得密集图?

发布于 2024-08-04 03:02:35 字数 413 浏览 2 评论 0原文

除了 Dijkstra 之外,还有其他方法可以计算近乎完整的图的最短路径吗?我有大约 8,000 个节点和大约 1800 万条边。我已经浏览了线程 “地图上的a到b”并决定使用Dijkstra。我使用 Boost::Graph 库在 Perl 中编写了脚本。但结果并不是我所期望的。使用调用 $graph->dijkstra_shortest_path($start_node,$end_node); 计算一条最短路径大约需要 10 多分钟。

我知道有很多优势,这可能是运行时间缓慢的原因。我是死在水里了吗?还有其他方法可以加快这个速度吗?

Is there another way to calculate the shortest path for a near complete graph other than Dijkstra? I have about 8,000 nodes and about 18 million edges. I've gone through the thread "a to b on map" and decided to use Dijkstra. I wrote my script in Perl using the Boost::Graph library. But the result isn't what I expected. It took about 10+ minutes to calculate one shortest path using the call $graph->dijkstra_shortest_path($start_node,$end_node);

I understand there are a lot of edges and it may be the reason behind the slow running time. Am I dead in the water? Is there any other way to speed this up?

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(2

旧时模样 2024-08-11 03:02:35

简短回答:如果您只想要一些最短路径,Dijkstra 算法是您的最佳选择;如果您想找到每对节点之间的最短路径,则 Floyd-Warshall 算法更好。

  • 对于加权图,Dijkstra 算法可以找到从一个源到图中所有其他节点的最短路径。它在 O(V^2) 时间内对密集图进行操作。

  • Floyd-Warshall 找到所有节点对之间的最短路径。它需要密集的表示并在 O(V^3) 时间内运行。它在加权或未加权图上运行。

即使你的图很密集(根据你的问题的标题),如果你只想找到一些最短路径,将其转换为稀疏图并使用 Dijkstra 的稀疏实现可能会有一些好处。稀疏 Dijkstra 的运行时间为 O(E log V)。

请注意,这是假设所有边权重都是非负的;如果是,那么您就不能使用其中任何一个。您将不得不使用更慢的算法,例如贝尔曼-福特算法。

Short answer: Dijkstra's is your best bet if you want just a few shortest paths, and the Floyd-Warshall algorithm is better if you want to find the shortest paths between every pair of nodes.

  • Dijkstra's algorithm finds the shortest paths from one source to all other nodes in the graph, for weighted graphs. It operates on dense graphs in O(V^2) time.

  • Floyd-Warshall finds shortest paths between all pairs of nodes. It requires a dense representation and runs in O(V^3) time. It operates on weighted or unweighted graphs.

Even though your graph is dense (according to the title of your question), there might be some benefit to converting it to a sparse graph and using a sparse implementation of Dijkstra's if you just want to find a few shortest paths. Sparse Dijkstra's runs in O(E log V).

Please note that this is assuming that all your edge weights are non-negative; if they are, then you can't use any of these. You would have to use an even slower algorithm, like Bellman-Ford.

陌上芳菲 2024-08-11 03:02:35

您还可以尝试尝试 A* 算法

如果您能够获得良好的启发式方法,那么这种方法尤其有用。

You could also try to give the A* algorithm a spin.

This approach is especially beneficial if you have access to good heuristics.

~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文