Most likely. Accessibility relies on tools that parse the underlying code. For example the table "summary" attribute, or more common, the "alt" attribute on the img tag. In addition, these tools may interpret the code in ways that may not be as straight-forward as this.
So, if a site is accessible is somewhat the same as saying that the underlying code is easily parseable. And, consequently, if it's parseable, it can easily be scraped.
发布评论
评论（1）
最有可能的。可访问性依赖于解析底层代码的工具。例如，
table“summary”属性，或更常见的是img标记上的“alt”属性。此外，这些工具可能会以不那么简单的方式解释代码。因此，如果一个站点可访问，就相当于说底层代码易于解析。因此，如果它是可解析的，那么它就很容易被删除。
所以，是的，你可以说这是一个矛盾。
Most likely. Accessibility relies on tools that parse the underlying code. For example the
table"summary" attribute, or more common, the "alt" attribute on theimgtag. In addition, these tools may interpret the code in ways that may not be as straight-forward as this.So, if a site is accessible is somewhat the same as saying that the underlying code is easily parseable. And, consequently, if it's parseable, it can easily be scraped.
So, yes, you could say it's an oxymoron.