开发网页的最佳屏幕分辨率是多少？
我每天都在创建网页。我首选的开发屏幕分辨率是：1600x1200，但是你的是什么？ 还有你用过其他插件吗？ 我使用 Firefox 的 window re sizer 1.0。但还有更好的选择吗？
I m, on a daily basis creating web pages. My preferred development screen resolution is: 1600x1200 but what is yours?
And do you use any other plug-ins?
I use window re sizer 1.0 for Firefox. But are there better options?
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（9）
在我看来，如果您使用窗口缩放器，那么您已经处于领先地位。我尝试以在 1024x768 屏幕上运行良好的页面为目标，考虑到滚动条和工具栏等。为了充分了解用户体验，偶尔将屏幕大小调整为 1024x768（或您支持的最小值）可能是值得的，但总的来说，窗口大小调整器可以让您足够清楚。
In my opinion, if you're using a window resizer, you're already on top of the game. I try to aim for pages that work well on a 1024x768 screen, accounting for scrollbars and toolbars and whatnot. It may be worth resizing your screen to 1024x768 (or whatever the minimum is that you support) every once in a while just to fully understand that user experience, but in general the window resizer keeps you aware enough.
我不同意 - 固定大小的布局就可以了。事实上，Stackoverflow.com 使用固定大小的布局，就像许多专业网站一样。原因是什么？ 可预测性
有几点：
我的 2 美分，
-Doug
I disagree - fixed size layouts are just fine. In fact, Stackoverflow.com uses a fixed size layout, as do a great many professional sites out there. The reason? Predictability.
A few things:
My 2 cents,
-Doug
这应该不重要 - 将您的网页设计得灵活且流畅，以便它们在任何合理的屏幕分辨率上都能优雅地降级。迎合具有极小屏幕空间和大显示屏的移动设备。
It shouldn't matter - design your web pages to be flexible and fluid such that they degrade gracefully on any reasonable screen resolution. Cater for mobile devices with very minimal screen space and massive displays.
我使用 2x1440x900 设置进行开发，但我使用 Web Developer Toolbar 将 Firefox 作为 1024x768 的窗口。
当您在一个屏幕上显示代码而在另一个屏幕上显示 Firefox 时，双显示器设置非常有用。
I develop with a 2x1440x900 setup, but I leave Firefox as a window at 1024x768 using Web Developer Toolbar.
The dual monitor setup is really useful when you have the code on one screen and Firefox on the other.
我不会超过 800x600。但是，理想情况下，您的布局不固定于屏幕尺寸，并且可以调整大小并且看起来仍然正确。
I wouldn't go over 800x600. However, ideally your layout is not fixed to a screen size, and can resize and still look right.
我坚持使用 1024x768。它通常足够大，足以满足您需要显示的内容，但并不是每个人都能达到 1600x1200。也许几年后。我会坚持使用较小的显示器......这样它可能会迫使你更加有设计意识。
I stick with 1024x768. It's usually big enough for what you need to display, and not everyone is quite to 1600x1200 yet. Maybe in a few years. I'd stick with a smaller display...that way it may force you to be more design conscience.
无论屏幕尺寸如何，两个屏幕都是无价的。一屏运行编辑器，一屏运行浏览器。令人惊奇的是，开发变得更加顺利。
Two screens are invaluable regardless of screen size. One screen to run your editor, and one screen to run your browser. It's amazing how much smoother development becomes.
我的统计数据显示 1024x768 是我的用户的主要分辨率，我当然不会低于该分辨率。除此之外，我显然同意这里其他人的观点，即固定尺寸布局只是一个坏主意，您的设计应该适应渲染上下文。
With my stats showing 1024x768 as my users' dominant resolution, I certainly wouldn't go below that. Beyond that, I agree with, apparently, everyone else here that fixed size layouts are just a bad idea, and your design should adapt to render context.
为了皮特的爱，不要使用像素大小的字体。请改用 em 或 pt 大小调整。
这实际上取决于您正在设计的页面类型。我会尝试在设计时考虑到页面的缩放能力。没有什么比在 1920x1200 显示器上放大设计为 800x600 的页面更让我讨厌的了。
我认为这里给出的最好建议就是尝试不同的分辨率而不是您的原生分辨率，并尝试使其在各种尺寸下看起来都不错。
For the love of Pete don't use pixel sized fonts. Use em or pt sizing instead.
It all really depends on what kind of page you are designing. I would try to design with the ability for the page to scale in mind. There is nothing I hate more than having to zoom in a page that was designed for 800x600 on a 1920x1200 display.
I think the best advice given here is just to try it at different resolutions instead of your native one, and try to make it look good at a variety of sizes.