高性能、高带宽 asp.net 云托管
想知道您会推荐什么作为流行的 ASP.NET 站点的托管提供商，同时考虑到性能和可扩展性。
我的一个朋友推荐了 webhost4life，它宣传无限带宽，但每月 10 美元，我很谨慎 - 特别是如果该网站变得流行并消耗大量带宽（例如 300GB/月） - 我想避免这种可能性我的托管提供商因此而削减了我的服务（似乎即使是无限制也有限制，这很公平）。
我正在考虑的选项包括 1. Windows Azure（对其 SQL 数据服务不太满意） 2.RackSpace云 3. GoGrid
感谢您对上述问题的想法 - 考虑从一个提供商转移到另一个提供商的容易程度、速度、成本等因素。
如果这个问题看起来像是一个骗局，我深表歉意，但我真的很感激对上述三个提供商的想法和比较。
编辑-运行计划任务的能力也很重要。
谢谢 灰。
Wanted to know what you would recommend as a hosting provider for a popular asp.net site, bearing performance and scalability in mind.
A friend of mine recommended webhost4life who advertises unlimited bandwidth, but at $10/month, i am wary - especially if the website grows to be popular and chews up a lot bandwidth (say 300GB/month) - I'd like to avoid the possibility of my hosting provider cutting my service because of that (seems that even unlimited has a limit, which is fair enough).
Among the options I am considering are
1. Windows Azure (not too comfortable with their SQL Data Services)
2. RackSpaceCloud
3. GoGrid
Appreciate your thoughts on the above - with considerations such as how easy it would be to transfer from one provider to another, speed, cost.
Apologies if this question seems like a dupe, but i would really appreciate thoughts and comparison on the three providers above.
EDIT - the ability to run scheduled tasks is also important.
Thanks
Ash.
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（3）
云计算基本上是“虚拟服务器”的一个很好的替代方案，但是当我们计算成本时，我们发现专用服务器仍然比云服务便宜。如今，虚拟服务器提供商和专用服务器提供商每月提供 1000GB 的带宽，而且您还拥有完全的控制权。
我建议虚拟服务器托管，它比当今的云更经过验证且更便宜。云仍然是新事物。
我的朋友经常向三个云服务提供商之一投诉数据丢失。几乎每 3-4 个月就有一次，硬盘会消失，每次重新配置 10GB 数据都会导致站点瘫痪数小时。
目前大家的SLA都说正常运行时间是99%左右，但是没有数据保证。最后，我不认为任何云服务的价格可以低至每月 10 美元，当您将运行网站所需的所有服务加起来时，它接近专用服务器托管成本。
Cloud computing is basically a nice alternative to "Virtual Servers", but when we calculate costs, we found that going dedicated servers are still cheaper then cloud services. Today Virtual Server providers and Dedicated Server providers give 1000GBs of bandwidth per month, plus you have full control.
I would suggest Virtual Server hosting which is much better proven and cheaper then cloud today. Cloud is still new.
My friends had regular data loss complaints at one of the three cloud service providers. Almost once in 3-4 months, the hard disk would disappear and reconfiguring it with 10GB of data everytime brings site down for hours.
Currently everyone's SLA says about 99% uptime, but there is no data guarentee. And finally I dont think of any cloud providing at as low as $10 per month, when you add up all services needed to run site, it comes near to dedicated server hosting cost.
GoDaddy 有一个 网格托管，每月 5 美元。我个人没有用过它——它可能很糟糕。
Go Daddy has a grid hosting for 5 bucks a month. I haven't used it personally - it might be crap.
Amazon EC2 绝对是高带宽和高性能，并且已经支持 Windows Server（我认为是 2003 年） ）和 IIS 已经使用了大约 6 个月了。您还可以将 Mono 与其 Linux 托管一起使用，有一个 AMI (用于每个操作系统的安装文件）。
不过，它的成本也相当高，因为您使用的是服务 (IIS) 而不是按需应用程序。因此，即使 IIS 坐在那里什么也不做而只是监听，它仍然会根据 他们的定价。
您可以运行计划任务或任何您喜欢的任务，因为您基本上只是获得一个可能托管在工业亚马逊网络场的 Hyper-V 中的专用服务器。
Amazon EC2 is definitely high bandwidth and high performance and has supported Windows Server (2003 I think) and IIS for about 6 months now. You can also use Mono with their Linux hosting, there is an AMI (the install file used for each OS) for that.
It's also fairly high cost though, as you're using a service (IIS) rather than an on demand application. So even when IIS is sat there doing nothing and just listening, it will still be using a block of allocated process and memory usage according to their pricing.
You can run scheduled tasks or anything you like as you are basically just getting a dedicated server presumably hosted in Hyper-V in the industrial Amazon web farm.