郑重声明一下，自从早期测试版以来，我就一直使用 Windows 2008 作为我的桌面选择。我可能失去了睡眠/冬眠，但我可以在早上机器启动时煮咖啡。
另外，我没有提到在虚拟机管理程序中运行其他操作系统，但您也可以这样做。
This is not a definative list and can be expanded by other editors if so required but:
Windows 7
Desktop OS so supports sleep/hibernate
Windows XP Mode for XP based testing
May have a smaller footprint than Server
May have more GUI Bling than Server
Has pretty animation when you boot up!
Can run all Windows OS's that you may need to deploy your application on with 3rd-Party Hypervisor
Native bluetooth stack
Windows 2008 R2
Server OS may support sleep/hibernate if no Hyper-V enabled
Ships with a free Hypervisor (HyperV)
Maybe faster a specific tasks due to optimizations made
May have a larger footprint than Desktop
Can run all Windows OS's that you may need to deploy your application on
No bluetooth capabilities
Both OS's
Built on the same kernel
Have the same networking stack
Share the same GUI
Decision
Go with what fits your needs.
Just for the record I have used Windows 2008 as my desktop of choice since the early beta's. I may have lost my sleep/hibernate but I can make my coffee while my machine boots in the morning.
Also I did not mention running other OS's in the Hypervisors but you could do that as well.
Windows Server 2008 R2是一个服务器版本，它附带了很多管理计算机网络的工具，而作为开发人员你只是不会使用它。最好在商店等待 Windows 7 或直接从 MSDN 获取。
Windows Server 2008 R2 is a server edition, it comes with a lot of tools to manage a computer network, and as a developer you just won't use it. It's better to wait for Windows 7 in shops or directly grab it from MSDN.
尝试运行带有 Hyper-V 的 Windows Server 2008 R2 作为桌面/工作站操作系统非常有吸引力，因为这样您就可以在同一台计算机上托管测试服务器。如果您正在为 x64 服务器环境进行开发，那么这确实是您想要做的事情。
但存在一个严重的问题：Hyper-V 会导致主机操作系统中某些特定视频驱动程序操作的运行速度慢得多。 Windows Server 2008 R2 以及任何类型的远程现代显卡都会尝试使用加速视频操作来执行许多简单的操作，例如滚动、移动和调整窗口大小，而当 Hyper-V 启用时，这些操作将会慢得多。已启用。不只是慢一点——慢得多以至于让人非常恼火。
当尝试使用带有 Hyper-V 的 Windows Server 2008 R2 作为桌面/工作站操作系统时，这是一个非常严重的问题。启用了 Hyper-V 的 Windows Server 2008 R2 确实应该仅用作很少使用控制台的服务器操作系统，因为控制台的视频性能将非常糟糕。
（Windows Server 2008（又名不是 R2）不会受到同样程度的问题，因为 Windows Server 2008 不使用加速视频操作来执行窗口滚动、移动和调整大小等常见任务。根本问题仍然存在，但已经不再存在。不会那么容易或经常被触发，所以它不会造成太大的阻碍。）
It is very attractive to try to run Windows Server 2008 R2 with Hyper-V as your desktop / workstation OS, because then you can host test servers on the same machine. If you are developing for an x64 server environment, this is really something that you might think you want to do.
But there is a serious problem: Hyper-V causes certain specific video driver operations in the host OS to run much much much more slowly. And Windows Server 2008 R2, with any kind of remotely modern graphics card, will attempt to use accelerated video operations for lots of simple things like scrolling, moving, and resizing windows, and those operations will be much much much slower when Hyper-V is enabled. Not just a little slower - so much slower as to be very aggravating.
This is a very serious problem when attempting to use Windows Server 2008 R2 with Hyper-V as a desktop / workstation OS. Windows Server 2008 R2 with Hyper-V enabled really should be used ONLY as a server OS where the console is used very rarely, because the console's video performance will be horrific.
(Windows Server 2008 (aka not R2) doesn't suffer to the same degree from this problem, because Windows Server 2008 does not use accelerated video operations for common tasks like window scrolling, moving, and resizing. The underlying problem is still present, but it doesn't get triggered as easily or as often, so it isn't as much of a hinderance.)
发布评论
评论（7）
这不是一个最终列表，如果需要，可以由其他编辑器扩展，但是：
Windows 7
Windows 2008 R2
两个操作系统
决策
郑重声明一下，自从早期测试版以来，我就一直使用 Windows 2008 作为我的桌面选择。我可能失去了睡眠/冬眠，但我可以在早上机器启动时煮咖啡。
另外，我没有提到在虚拟机管理程序中运行其他操作系统，但您也可以这样做。
This is not a definative list and can be expanded by other editors if so required but:
Windows 7
Windows 2008 R2
Both OS's
Decision
Just for the record I have used Windows 2008 as my desktop of choice since the early beta's. I may have lost my sleep/hibernate but I can make my coffee while my machine boots in the morning.
Also I did not mention running other OS's in the Hypervisors but you could do that as well.
我对 2008 R2 唯一的不满是缺乏蓝牙支持，这意味着我没有键盘和鼠标...所以，我选择了 7。
有了它的完整版 IIS，我无法击败它 - 太棒了。
通过配备 4GB RAM 的 MacBookPro 和配备 12GB 的 i7 920（显然都是 x64）来运行它，没有任何抱怨！
My only beef with 2008 R2 was the lack of Bluetooth support, which meant no keyboard and mouse for me...so, I went for 7.
With it's full version of IIS, I can't beat it - totally awesome.
Running it though a MacBookPro with 4GB of RAM and a i7 920 with 12GB - both x64 (obviously) - not a single complaint!
Windows 7：
Windows 7 :
Windows 7 - 有些客户端应用程序无法在 Windows 2008 上运行
Windows 7 - There are some client apps that do not run on windows 2008
Windows Server 2008 R2是一个服务器版本，它附带了很多管理计算机网络的工具，而作为开发人员你只是不会使用它。最好在商店等待 Windows 7 或直接从 MSDN 获取。
Windows Server 2008 R2 is a server edition, it comes with a lot of tools to manage a computer network, and as a developer you just won't use it. It's better to wait for Windows 7 in shops or directly grab it from MSDN.
尝试运行带有 Hyper-V 的 Windows Server 2008 R2 作为桌面/工作站操作系统非常有吸引力，因为这样您就可以在同一台计算机上托管测试服务器。如果您正在为 x64 服务器环境进行开发，那么这确实是您想要做的事情。
但存在一个严重的问题：Hyper-V 会导致主机操作系统中某些特定视频驱动程序操作的运行速度慢得多。 Windows Server 2008 R2 以及任何类型的远程现代显卡都会尝试使用加速视频操作来执行许多简单的操作，例如滚动、移动和调整窗口大小，而当 Hyper-V 启用时，这些操作将会慢得多。已启用。不只是慢一点——慢得多以至于让人非常恼火。
当尝试使用带有 Hyper-V 的 Windows Server 2008 R2 作为桌面/工作站操作系统时，这是一个非常严重的问题。启用了 Hyper-V 的 Windows Server 2008 R2 确实应该仅用作很少使用控制台的服务器操作系统，因为控制台的视频性能将非常糟糕。
Microsoft 已经意识到这个问题，但还不是很广为人知。以下博客条目包含一些信息，并链接到其他信息源： http://blogs.msdn.com/virtual_pc_guy/archive/2009/08/21/hyper-v-versus-desktop-computing.aspx
（Windows Server 2008（又名不是 R2）不会受到同样程度的问题，因为 Windows Server 2008 不使用加速视频操作来执行窗口滚动、移动和调整大小等常见任务。根本问题仍然存在，但已经不再存在。不会那么容易或经常被触发，所以它不会造成太大的阻碍。）
It is very attractive to try to run Windows Server 2008 R2 with Hyper-V as your desktop / workstation OS, because then you can host test servers on the same machine. If you are developing for an x64 server environment, this is really something that you might think you want to do.
But there is a serious problem: Hyper-V causes certain specific video driver operations in the host OS to run much much much more slowly. And Windows Server 2008 R2, with any kind of remotely modern graphics card, will attempt to use accelerated video operations for lots of simple things like scrolling, moving, and resizing windows, and those operations will be much much much slower when Hyper-V is enabled. Not just a little slower - so much slower as to be very aggravating.
This is a very serious problem when attempting to use Windows Server 2008 R2 with Hyper-V as a desktop / workstation OS. Windows Server 2008 R2 with Hyper-V enabled really should be used ONLY as a server OS where the console is used very rarely, because the console's video performance will be horrific.
This is a problem that Microsoft is aware of, but which isn't very widely known. Here's a blog entry that has some information, and which links to other sources of information: http://blogs.msdn.com/virtual_pc_guy/archive/2009/08/21/hyper-v-versus-desktop-computing.aspx
(Windows Server 2008 (aka not R2) doesn't suffer to the same degree from this problem, because Windows Server 2008 does not use accelerated video operations for common tasks like window scrolling, moving, and resizing. The underlying problem is still present, but it doesn't get triggered as easily or as often, so it isn't as much of a hinderance.)
Windows 7是Windows Server 2008 R2的删减，因此Windows Server 2008 R2更好。
Windows 7 is cutted Windows Server 2008 R2, so Windows Server 2008 R2 is better.