Seam 和 Dojo 与 RichFace 或 IceFace
我只是对在 Seam 中使用 DoJo 代替 RichFaces 或 IceFace 感到摸不着头脑。 我在网上找不到任何文章或教程。我的问题的原因是我来自 DoJo/Domino 项目，并且希望在 J2EE/Seam/DoJo 中拥有这个项目。
感谢任何意见...
TIA。
I am just scratching my head on using DoJo in Seam in place of RichFaces or IceFace.
I couldn't find any article or tutorial out there in the web. The reason for my question is that Iam coming out of a DoJo/Domino project and like to have this project in J2EE/Seam/DoJo.
Appreciate any input...
TIA.
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（5）
没有理由不能在 Seam 中使用 DOJO（或 jQuery）。唯一的区别是，与 Richfaces/Icefaces 不同，您无法轻松实现与后端 Seam Bean 的“开箱即用”Ajax 集成。
但这不一定是坏事。考虑使用以下方法之一将 DOJO 组件连接到 Seam Bean：
There's no reason why you can't use DOJO (or jQuery for that matter) with Seam. The only difference is that unlike Richfaces/Icefaces you aren't going to get easy "out-of-the-box" Ajax integration with your back-end Seam Beans.
But this isn't necessarily a bad thing. Consider hooking your DOJO components up to your Seam Beans using one of these methods:
我不太明白这个问题，你到底要我们告诉你什么？
Dojo 是一个 JavaScript 框架，而 RichFaces 和 IceFaces 是 JSF 实现。 RichFaces 和 IceFaces 之间存在差异，如果不清楚您的项目目标是什么，我认为没有人能够给您正确的答案。
项目的要求应该帮助您定义应该使用哪些工具。
I don't really understand the question, what are you really asking us to tell you?
Dojo is a JavaScript framework while RichFaces and IceFaces are JSF implementations. There are differences between RichFaces and IceFaces, without a clear idea of what the goal of your project is I don't think anyone will be able to give you a correct answer.
The requirements of the project should help you define what tools you should be using.
好吧，如果你问哪一个更好……很难说。我认为如果您是第一次使用 Seam，最好坚持使用 RichFaces，因为它是默认设置并且是为与 Seam 一起使用而构建的。所有 Seam 官方文档也都使用 RichFaces。
Well if you asking which one is better... it's hard to say. I think if your working with Seam for the first time it would be better to stick with RichFaces as it is the default and is built to work with Seam. All of the official Seam documentation uses RichFaces also.
Richfaces 看起来比 Icefaces 更适合工作，因为它具有内置支持，易于学习且易于使用。对seam+richfaces组合的长期支持保证。
Richfaces looks more good option to work than Icefaces bcoz it has inbuilt support, its easy to learn & its long time support guarantee for seam+richfaces combination.
Seam 在 JSF 中更强大，但不一定是 Richfaces 或 Icefaces，因为它们大多只是扩展组件集，无论如何，当由 JSF 呈现时，这些组件集都会落入标准 HTML 组件。
在我的公司，我们经常使用 jQuery 皮肤 + JSF 标准组件而不是 richfaces/icefaces，因为外观和感觉定制更容易。我认为使用 DoJo 你可以做类似的事情。
一些起点：
将 JSF 与 Dojo 小部件结合起来 | dojofaces.org | dojofaces 创建者
Seam is more powerful with JSF, but not necessarily Richfaces or Icefaces, for they mostly just extend the component set, which is anyway fall down to standard HTML components when rendered by JSF.
In my company we often use jQuery skinning + JSF standard components INSTEAD of richfaces/icefaces, because Look&Feel customization is much easier. I think with DoJo you can do something similar.
A few starting points:
Combine JSF with Dojo widgets | dojofaces.org | dojofaces creators