如何在其他站点中注入 Javascript(包括 Prototype.js)而不扰乱全局命名空间?
我目前正在进行的一个项目是一个使用 Prototype 库的大型网站,并且已经有大量的 Javascript 代码。
我们现在正在编写一段代码,它将被“注入”到其他人的网站中(想象一下人们在他们的网站中添加一个
我遇到的问题是,仅仅添加一个
现在我正在考虑一些丑陋的选择,而且我不确定什么是最好的...
- 重写所有内容以使用 jQuery,并在各处重命名 $ 对象。
- 创建一个“新”原型库,仅包含我们在“注入”代码中使用的子集,并将 $ 重命名为其他名称。 然后我又必须调整我的代码中以某种方式共享的部分。
- 在注入的代码中根本不使用库,以使其尽可能干净,并重写共享代码以根本不使用库。 这显然会导致我们创建自己的弗兰肯斯坦图书馆,这可能是有史以来最糟糕的情况。
我想知道你们认为我能做什么,以及是否有一些神奇的选项可以解决我所有的问题...
例如,您认为我可以使用 Caja / Cajita 之类的东西来沙箱我自己的代码并隔离它来自网站的其余部分,并且里面有原型? 还是我完全没有抓住重点?
我还读过一次有关小书签的技术,您是否像这样添加代码:
(function() { /* your code */ })();
然后您的代码全部位于匿名函数内,并且您根本没有触及全局名称空间。 你认为我可以制作一个包含以下内容的文件:
(function() {
/* Full Code of the Prototype file here */
/* All my code that will run in the "other" site */
InitializeStuff_CreateDOMElements_AttachEventHandlers();
})();
这可行吗? 例如,它是否能够实现不使全局命名空间混乱、不破坏使用 jQuery 的网站上的功能的目标?
或者原型是否太复杂而无法像这样隔离它?
(注意:我想我知道这会在各处创建闭包并且速度较慢,但我不太关心性能,我的代码没有做任何复杂的事情)
I'm currently on a project that is a big site that uses the Prototype library, and there is already a humongous amount of Javascript code.
We're now working on a piece of code that will get "injected" into other people's sites (picture people adding a <script> tag in their sites) which will then run our code and add a bunch of DOM elements and functionality to their site. This will have new pieces of code, and will also reuse a lot of the code that we use on our main site.
The problem I have is that it's of course not cool to just add a <script> that will include Prototype in people's pages. If we do that in a page that's already using ANY framework, we're guaranteed to screw everything up.
jQuery gives us the option to "rename" the $ object, so it could handle this situation decently, except obviously for the fact that we're not using jQuery, so we'd have to migrate everything.
Right now i'm contemplating a number of ugly choices, and I'm not sure what's best...
- Rewrite everything to use jQuery, with a renamed $ object everywhere.
- Creating a "new" Prototype library with only the subset we'd be using in "injected" code, and renaming $ to something else. Then again I'd have to adapt the parts of my code that would be shared somehow.
- Not using a library at all in injected code, to keep it as clean as possible, and rewriting the shared code to use no library at all. This would obviously degenerate into us creating our own frankenstein of a library, which is probably the worst case scenario ever.
I'm wondering what you guys think I could do, and also whether there's some magic option that would solve all my problems...
For example, do you think I could use something like Caja / Cajita to sandbox my own code and isolate it from the rest of the site, and have Prototype inside of there? Or am I completely missing the point with that?
I also read once about a technique for bookmarklets, were you add your code like this:
(function() { /* your code */ })();
And then your code is all inside your anonymous function and you haven't touched the global namespace at all.
Do you think I could make one file containing:
(function() {
/* Full Code of the Prototype file here */
/* All my code that will run in the "other" site */
InitializeStuff_CreateDOMElements_AttachEventHandlers();
})();
Would that work? Would it accomplish the objective of not cluttering the global namespace, and not killing the functionality on a site that uses jQuery, for example?
Or is Prototype too complex somehow to isolate it like that?
(NOTE: I think I know that that would create closures everywhere and that's slower, but I don't care too much about performance, my code is not doing anything that complex)
如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱,如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论,将不能在第一时间通知您!
发布评论
评论(2)
如果您要将代码注入其他站点,要么要求它们也包含原型,要么根本不使用库。
在我看来,任何其他选择都太具有侵入性。
If you're injecting your code into other sites, either require that they also include prototype, or don't use a library at all.
Any other option is, in my opinion, far too intrusive.
丹尼尔,
由于某些相同的原因,我遇到了同样的问题。 值得庆幸的是,我能够使用jquery。 我想要做的是创建一个 js 文件,它将加载 jquery 实例和我需要的任何依赖库。 然后我想以同样的方式加载css。
我找到了一个脚本,可以将这些文件加载到 DOM 中,但它们似乎不起作用。 这是我正在使用的:
我可以在 firebug 中看到 css 已加载,但我的 css 文件的内容未通过。 我本来希望能够根据这个WIDGET使用的工具动态加载我需要的库。 所以我想做一些编程逻辑来确定应该“导入”哪些库和CSS文件。
不确定这种思路是否会影响你的努力,但我很想了解你的想法,或者看看你最终会得到什么结果。
Daniel,
I am running into the same issue for some of the same reasons. Thanksfully, I am able to use jquery. What I want to do is create a single js file that will load up an instance of jquery and any dependent libraries I need. Then I want to load up css in the same way.
I found a script that will load these files into the DOM, but they don't seem to work. Here is what I am using:
I can see in firebug that the css is loaded, but the contents of my css file are not coming through. I had hoped that I could dynamically load the libraries I needed based on the tools that this WIDGET used. So I would like to do some programmatic logic that would determine which libraries and css files should be "imported".
Not sure if this line of thinking plays into your efforts, but I would love to get your thoughts, or see where you end up going with this.