90 wpm is a good typing speed. As long as you're being as efficient as possible, go for it!
The only reason you may want to learn home-row typing is so that you can know how fast you are using that method. If you're doing 90 by poking, you'd probably be a speed demon with home-row!
90WPM is a good typing speed. In fact people can easily learn and improve there typing speed with the help of many touch typing software in the market. These software are easily available in the market and easy to learn as well.
if you are typing 90 wpm with two fingers then by all means don't stop in my opinion. I learned via the home-row style and only average around 30 - 50 wpm. :)
I actually got a D in my typing class (still typewriter) and I remember telling my teacher, I'm never going to use this....
我赞同 Robert Cartaino 关于将视频放到 YouTube 上的建议。 我想看看这个！ 不允许使用视频编辑技巧。
There are people who are religious about it. But if you can type 90 wpm with two fingers, who cares what other people think? Your two fingers are faster than my 10.
Speed and accuracy is more important than how many fingers you type with. Perhaps more important though is how much concentration your typing method requires. This is an area where touch typing has an advantage.
Programmers that don't need to stop and look at their keyboard have a higher probability of putting their ideas into code quickly and efficiently. It is argued that non-touch typists may be more prone to taking shortcuts that sacrifice code quality.
Jeff Atwood has a nice blog post on this subject which contains a reference to a much longer rant on Stevey's Blog.
My impression is that people who know how to touch type tend to write more documentation in their code - just because it's easy. That's why I would check the typing speed of programmers when hiring, and 10 finger typists would have some bonus.
By the way: learning home-row typing is probably much easier for you than you think. Just understand the basic principle and remind yourself periodically how it should be done and how to place your hands on the keyboard, and you will be typing faster and more conveniently in a couple of weeks. There is no need to take a course or something.
在中学时，我用每只手的前两个手指和两个拇指打字速度非常快。 我被迫参加盲打课程（关于可怕的 IBM Selectrics），忘记了我发明的系统，并且再也无法恢复我十一岁时的速度。 如果鞋子合脚，那就一定要穿它。
In middle school I typed blazingly fast using the first two fingers of each hand and both thumbs. I was made to take a touch-typing class (on horrible IBM Selectrics), forgot the system I'd invented, and have never been able to recover the speed I had when I was eleven. If the shoe fits, then by all means wear it.
My concern wouldn't be about whether your typing style is acceptable, but whether it's safe. Although I don't have any evidence that this is the case, it's possible that your differing typing style might make you more prone to repetitive stress injuries such as carpal tunnel. If you start having pain problems, consider trying to learn to type more traditionally and it might help.
I probably only make around 60 WPM myself (depends what you consider a "word" -- insert two-byte joke here) so I don't think your speed is anything to worry about.
发布评论
评论（10）
只要你打字又快又准，谁都无权评判……
As long as your typing is fast and accurate, no one has a right to judge...
90 WPM 是一个不错的打字速度。 只要你尽可能高效，就去吧！
您可能想要学习主行输入的唯一原因是为了了解您使用该方法的速度。 如果你通过 poking 完成 90，那么你可能会成为本垒的速度恶魔！
90 wpm is a good typing speed. As long as you're being as efficient as possible, go for it!
The only reason you may want to learn home-row typing is so that you can know how fast you are using that method. If you're doing 90 by poking, you'd probably be a speed demon with home-row!
90WPM 是一个不错的打字速度。 事实上，人们可以借助市场上许多盲打软件轻松学习和提高打字速度。 这些软件在市场上很容易买到，而且也很容易学习。
90WPM is a good typing speed. In fact people can easily learn and improve there typing speed with the help of many touch typing software in the market. These software are easily available in the market and easy to learn as well.
如果您用两根手指输入 90 WPM，那么我认为无论如何都不要停止。 我通过本垒风格学习，平均速度只有 30 - 50 WPM 左右。 :)
我实际上在打字课上得到了 D（仍然是打字机），我记得告诉我的老师，我永远不会使用这个......
啊，一个年轻人著名的遗言...... :)
if you are typing 90 wpm with two fingers then by all means don't stop in my opinion. I learned via the home-row style and only average around 30 - 50 wpm. :)
I actually got a D in my typing class (still typewriter) and I remember telling my teacher, I'm never going to use this....
Ah, famous last words of a youngen... :)
有些人对此抱有宗教信仰。 但如果你用两根手指就能输入 90 WPM，谁在乎别人怎么想呢？ 你的两根手指比我的十根手指还快。
这是一个对此非常虔诚的人。 使阅读变得有趣：
http://steve-yegge.blogspot.com/ 2008/09/programmings-dirtiest-little-secret.html
我赞同 Robert Cartaino 关于将视频放到 YouTube 上的建议。 我想看看这个！ 不允许使用视频编辑技巧。
There are people who are religious about it. But if you can type 90 wpm with two fingers, who cares what other people think? Your two fingers are faster than my 10.
Here's someone who is religious about it. Makes for amusing reading:
http://steve-yegge.blogspot.com/2008/09/programmings-dirtiest-little-secret.html
I second Robert Cartaino's suggestion about putting a video on youtube. I want to see this! No video editing tricks allowed.
速度和准确性比用多少根手指打字更重要。 也许更重要的是你的打字方法需要多大的注意力。 这是盲打具有优势的领域。
不需要停下来看着键盘的程序员更有可能快速有效地将他们的想法转化为代码。 有人认为，非接触式打字员可能更容易采取牺牲代码质量的捷径。
Jeff Atwood 有一篇关于此主题的精彩博客文章，其中包含对Stevey 的博客上的咆哮要长得多。
Speed and accuracy is more important than how many fingers you type with. Perhaps more important though is how much concentration your typing method requires. This is an area where touch typing has an advantage.
Programmers that don't need to stop and look at their keyboard have a higher probability of putting their ideas into code quickly and efficiently. It is argued that non-touch typists may be more prone to taking shortcuts that sacrifice code quality.
Jeff Atwood has a nice blog post on this subject which contains a reference to a much longer rant on Stevey's Blog.
我的印象是，知道如何触摸输入的人倾向于在代码中编写更多文档 - 只是因为它很简单。 所以我在招聘的时候会检查程序员的打字速度，10指打字员会有一些奖金。
顺便说一句：学习主行输入对您来说可能比您想象的要容易得多。 只要了解基本原理，并定期提醒自己应该如何做以及如何将手放在键盘上，几周后您就会打字更快、更方便。 不需要参加课程或其他什么。
My impression is that people who know how to touch type tend to write more documentation in their code - just because it's easy. That's why I would check the typing speed of programmers when hiring, and 10 finger typists would have some bonus.
By the way: learning home-row typing is probably much easier for you than you think. Just understand the basic principle and remind yourself periodically how it should be done and how to place your hands on the keyboard, and you will be typing faster and more conveniently in a couple of weeks. There is no need to take a course or something.
谁会关心你如何使用键盘？
我们的代码就是我们的艺术，有人关心你如何输入它，就像有人因为艺术家握笔的方式而拒绝购买艺术品一样。
所以，这个问题再无关紧要了。 投票结束。
Who in hell would care how you use a keyboard?
Our code is our art, somebody caring how you typed it is like someone refusing to buy art because of how an artist holds the pencil.
So, this question could not be more irrelevant. Voting to close.
在中学时，我用每只手的前两个手指和两个拇指打字速度非常快。 我被迫参加盲打课程（关于可怕的 IBM Selectrics），忘记了我发明的系统，并且再也无法恢复我十一岁时的速度。 如果鞋子合脚，那就一定要穿它。
In middle school I typed blazingly fast using the first two fingers of each hand and both thumbs. I was made to take a touch-typing class (on horrible IBM Selectrics), forgot the system I'd invented, and have never been able to recover the speed I had when I was eleven. If the shoe fits, then by all means wear it.
我关心的不是你的打字风格是否可以接受，而是它是否安全。 尽管我没有任何证据表明情况确实如此，但您不同的打字风格可能会让您更容易遭受重复性压力损伤，例如腕管损伤。 如果您开始出现疼痛问题，请考虑尝试学习更传统的打字方式，这可能会有所帮助。
我自己可能只制作大约 60 WPM（取决于您对“单词”的看法 - 在此插入两字节笑话），所以我认为您的速度无需担心。
My concern wouldn't be about whether your typing style is acceptable, but whether it's safe. Although I don't have any evidence that this is the case, it's possible that your differing typing style might make you more prone to repetitive stress injuries such as carpal tunnel. If you start having pain problems, consider trying to learn to type more traditionally and it might help.
I probably only make around 60 WPM myself (depends what you consider a "word" -- insert two-byte joke here) so I don't think your speed is anything to worry about.