Try searching for "Continuous Integration". It's a Good Thing(TM), in my opinion. "Continuous Implementation" would only be a good development methodology in the Dilbert universe. ;)
Edit:
The original question was simply asking what "continuous implementation" is. Since this site is StackOverflow, not EconomicsOverflow or PolymerEngineeringOverflow, the correct answer is "nothing."
The question was edited afterward to expand the scope, but that doesn't really change my answer.
All references of this term I can find in the realm of software development appear to be a mistake where the author is really meant continuous integration, a common agile technique.
The OP now referenced a a paper using the term in the context of use of the term in an "agile" supply-chain management implementation. Even so, despite the publication, the term has not entered common parlance in SCM, much less software development, and thus has no generally-accepted definition.
I think, the OP is referring to 'Continuous Implementation' only. It is not a commonly used term.
I didn't hear the term, but in the Agile or Scrum methodology, the implementations happen frequently than the traditional waterfall model (but obviously not continuously as in 'Continuous Implementation').
At the company I work, we follow Scrum methodology to deliver the new version every 6 months. Since ours is a product company offering Software-as-Service, the implementations are in our control. We eventually plan to have more frequent implementations. This is much different from the pre-Scrum days, when the new version comes typically every 2 years.
MIKE，一种信息系统管理方法，也使用该术语； 请参阅此处。 OP 中提到的沃尔沃可能指的是 MIKE 或类似的东西。
Continuous implementation is a term used in game theory. See here for example. I doubt that this is what you're after, but there you are anyway.
MIKE, an information systems management approach, also uses the term; see here. The Volvo reference in the OP may be referring to MIKE or something similar.
关于此实践的开创性文章是 Martin Fowler 的 “持续集成”（这是原文，顶部有一个更新版本的链接）。
Richard is likely correct that you mean Continuous Integration, a practice whose primary element is frequent builds to ensure the incremental addition of working functionality to your software.
事实上，我认为这种新动物来自精益背景（这在沃尔沃的背景下是有意义的）。 不过没什么正式的。 换句话说，它听起来很敏捷，尝起来很敏捷，但没有人确切知道它意味着什么，而且，出于这些原因，我确信沃尔沃的 C 级经理非常喜欢它:) 这实际上让我的废话检测器响亮起来。
Actually, I think that this new animal comes from a Lean background (which makes sense in the context of Volvo). Nothing formal though. In other words, it sounds Agile, it taste Agile but nobody knows exactly what it means and, for these reasons, I'm sure Volvo's C-level managers like it a lot :) This makes my bullshit detector ring very loudly actually.
发布评论
评论（6）
尝试搜索“持续集成”。 在我看来，这是一件好事（TM）。 在 Dilbert 宇宙中，“持续实施”只会是一种很好的开发方法。 ;)
编辑：
最初的问题只是问什么是“持续实施”。 由于该网站是 StackOverflow，而不是 EconomicsOverflow 或 PolymerEngineeringOverflow，因此正确答案是“什么都没有”。
后来对问题进行了编辑以扩大范围，但这并没有真正改变我的答案。
我在软件开发领域找到的所有关于这个术语的参考文献似乎都是一个错误，作者真正的意思是持续集成，一种常见的敏捷技术。
现在，OP 在“敏捷”供应链管理实施中使用该术语的上下文中引用了一篇使用该术语的论文。 即便如此，尽管已发布，但该术语尚未进入 SCM（更不用说软件开发）中的通用用语，因此没有普遍接受的定义。
Try searching for "Continuous Integration". It's a Good Thing(TM), in my opinion. "Continuous Implementation" would only be a good development methodology in the Dilbert universe. ;)
Edit:
The original question was simply asking what "continuous implementation" is. Since this site is StackOverflow, not EconomicsOverflow or PolymerEngineeringOverflow, the correct answer is "nothing."
The question was edited afterward to expand the scope, but that doesn't really change my answer.
All references of this term I can find in the realm of software development appear to be a mistake where the author is really meant continuous integration, a common agile technique.
The OP now referenced a a paper using the term in the context of use of the term in an "agile" supply-chain management implementation. Even so, despite the publication, the term has not entered common parlance in SCM, much less software development, and thus has no generally-accepted definition.
我认为，OP 仅指“持续实施”。 它不是一个常用术语。
我没有听说过这个术语，但在敏捷或 Scrum 方法中，实现比传统的瀑布模型更频繁（但显然不像“持续实现”那样连续）。
在我工作的公司，我们遵循 Scrum 方法每 6 个月交付新版本。 由于我们是一家提供软件即服务的产品公司，因此实施由我们控制。 我们最终计划进行更频繁的实施。 这与 Scrum 之前的时代有很大不同，当时新版本通常每两年发布一次。
I think, the OP is referring to 'Continuous Implementation' only. It is not a commonly used term.
I didn't hear the term, but in the Agile or Scrum methodology, the implementations happen frequently than the traditional waterfall model (but obviously not continuously as in 'Continuous Implementation').
At the company I work, we follow Scrum methodology to deliver the new version every 6 months. Since ours is a product company offering Software-as-Service, the implementations are in our control. We eventually plan to have more frequent implementations. This is much different from the pre-Scrum days, when the new version comes typically every 2 years.
持续实施是博弈论中使用的术语。 例如，请参阅此处。 我怀疑这就是你所追求的，但无论如何你就在那里。
MIKE，一种信息系统管理方法，也使用该术语； 请参阅此处。 OP 中提到的沃尔沃可能指的是 MIKE 或类似的东西。
Continuous implementation is a term used in game theory. See here for example. I doubt that this is what you're after, but there you are anyway.
MIKE, an information systems management approach, also uses the term; see here. The Volvo reference in the OP may be referring to MIKE or something similar.
理查德很可能是正确的，您的意思是持续集成，这种实践的主要元素是频繁构建，以确保向软件中增量添加工作功能。
关于此实践的开创性文章是 Martin Fowler 的 “持续集成”（这是原文，顶部有一个更新版本的链接）。
Richard is likely correct that you mean Continuous Integration, a practice whose primary element is frequent builds to ensure the incremental addition of working functionality to your software.
The seminal article on this practice is "Continuous Integration" by Martin Fowler (this is the original, there is a link at the top to an updated version).
听起来营销人员与术语不匹配。 一直在发生。
Sounds like marketing people mismatched the terminology. Happens all the time.
事实上，我认为这种新动物来自精益背景（这在沃尔沃的背景下是有意义的）。 不过没什么正式的。 换句话说，它听起来很敏捷，尝起来很敏捷，但没有人确切知道它意味着什么，而且，出于这些原因，我确信沃尔沃的 C 级经理非常喜欢它:) 这实际上让我的废话检测器响亮起来。
Actually, I think that this new animal comes from a Lean background (which makes sense in the context of Volvo). Nothing formal though. In other words, it sounds Agile, it taste Agile but nobody knows exactly what it means and, for these reasons, I'm sure Volvo's C-level managers like it a lot :) This makes my bullshit detector ring very loudly actually.