如何避免安装“无限强度” 部署应用程序时的 JCE 策略文件?

发布于 2024-07-29 05:21:52 字数 290 浏览 8 评论 0原文

我有一个使用 256 位 AES 加密的应用程序,Java 不支持该加密。 我知道为了让它正常工作,我在安全文件夹中安装了 JCE 无限强度 jar。 这对我作为开发人员来说很好,我可以安装它们。

我的问题是,由于此应用程序将被分发,最终用户很可能不会安装这些策略文件。 让最终用户下载这些只是为了使应用程序发挥作用并不是一个有吸引力的解决方案。

有没有办法让我的应用程序运行而不覆盖最终用户计算机上的文件? 第三方软件可以在不安装策略文件的情况下处理它吗? 或者只是从 JAR 中引用这些策略文件的方法?

I have an app that uses 256-bit AES encryption which is not supported by Java out of the box. I know to get this to function correctly I install the JCE unlimited strength jars in the security folder. This is fine for me being the developer, I can install them.

My question is since this app will be distributed, end users most likely will not have these policy files installed. Having the end user download these just to make the app function is not an attractive solution.

Is there a way to make my app run without overwriting files on the end user machine? A third party software that can handle it without the policy files installed? Or a way to just reference these policy files from within a JAR?

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(11

紫﹏色ふ单纯 2024-08-05 05:21:52

对于这个问题,有一些常见的解决方案。 不幸的是,这些都不是完全令人满意:

  • 安装
  • 跳过 JCE API 并使用其他加密库,例如 Bouncy Castle。 这种方法需要额外的 1MB 库,根据应用程序的不同,这可能是一个很大的负担。 复制标准库中包含的功能也感觉很愚蠢。 显然,该API也与通常的JCE接口完全不同。 (BC 确实实现了 JCE 提供程序,但这没有帮助,因为移交给实现之前应用了密钥强度限制。)此解决方案也不允许您使用 256 位 TLS( SSL)密码套件,因为标准 TLS 库在内部调用 JCE 来确定任何限制。

但是还有反射。有什么是你不能使用反射做的吗?

private static void removeCryptographyRestrictions() {
    if (!isRestrictedCryptography()) {
        logger.fine("Cryptography restrictions removal not needed");
        return;
    }
    try {
        /*
         * Do the following, but with reflection to bypass access checks:
         *
         * JceSecurity.isRestricted = false;
         * JceSecurity.defaultPolicy.perms.clear();
         * JceSecurity.defaultPolicy.add(CryptoAllPermission.INSTANCE);
         */
        final Class<?> jceSecurity = Class.forName("javax.crypto.JceSecurity");
        final Class<?> cryptoPermissions = Class.forName("javax.crypto.CryptoPermissions");
        final Class<?> cryptoAllPermission = Class.forName("javax.crypto.CryptoAllPermission");

        final Field isRestrictedField = jceSecurity.getDeclaredField("isRestricted");
        isRestrictedField.setAccessible(true);
        final Field modifiersField = Field.class.getDeclaredField("modifiers");
        modifiersField.setAccessible(true);
        modifiersField.setInt(isRestrictedField, isRestrictedField.getModifiers() & ~Modifier.FINAL);
        isRestrictedField.set(null, false);

        final Field defaultPolicyField = jceSecurity.getDeclaredField("defaultPolicy");
        defaultPolicyField.setAccessible(true);
        final PermissionCollection defaultPolicy = (PermissionCollection) defaultPolicyField.get(null);

        final Field perms = cryptoPermissions.getDeclaredField("perms");
        perms.setAccessible(true);
        ((Map<?, ?>) perms.get(defaultPolicy)).clear();

        final Field instance = cryptoAllPermission.getDeclaredField("INSTANCE");
        instance.setAccessible(true);
        defaultPolicy.add((Permission) instance.get(null));

        logger.fine("Successfully removed cryptography restrictions");
    } catch (final Exception e) {
        logger.log(Level.WARNING, "Failed to remove cryptography restrictions", e);
    }
}

private static boolean isRestrictedCryptography() {
    // This matches Oracle Java 7 and 8, but not Java 9 or OpenJDK.
    final String name = System.getProperty("java.runtime.name");
    final String ver = System.getProperty("java.version");
    return name != null && name.equals("Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment")
            && ver != null && (ver.startsWith("1.7") || ver.startsWith("1.8"));
}

在执行任何加密操作之前,只需从静态初始化程序等调用 removeCryptographyRestrictions() 即可。

JceSecurity.isRestricted = false 部分是直接使用 256 位密码所需的全部内容; 但是,如果没有其他两个操作,Cipher.getMaxAllowedKeyLength() 仍将继续报告 128,并且 256 位 TLS 密码套件将无法工作。

此代码适用于 Oracle Java 7 和 8,并在 Java 9 和 OpenJDK 上自动跳过不需要的进程。 毕竟,这是一个丑陋的黑客行为,它可能无法在其他供应商的虚拟机上运行。

它也不适用于 Oracle Java 6,因为私有 JCE 类在那里被混淆了。 不过,混淆不会因版本而异,因此技术上仍然可以支持 Java 6。

There are a couple of commonly quoted solutions to this problem. Unfortunately neither of these are entirely satisfactory:

  • Install the unlimited strength policy files. While this is probably the right solution for your development workstation, it quickly becomes a major hassle (if not a roadblock) to have non-technical users install the files on every computer. There is no way to distribute the files with your program; they must be installed in the JRE directory (which may even be read-only due to permissions).
  • Skip the JCE API and use another cryptography library such as Bouncy Castle. This approach requires an extra 1MB library, which may be a significant burden depending on the application. It also feels silly to duplicate functionality included in the standard libraries. Obviously, the API is also completely different from the usual JCE interface. (BC does implement a JCE provider, but that doesn't help because the key strength restrictions are applied before handing over to the implementation.) This solution also won't let you use 256-bit TLS (SSL) cipher suites, because the standard TLS libraries call the JCE internally to determine any restrictions.

But then there's reflection. Is there anything you can't do using reflection?

private static void removeCryptographyRestrictions() {
    if (!isRestrictedCryptography()) {
        logger.fine("Cryptography restrictions removal not needed");
        return;
    }
    try {
        /*
         * Do the following, but with reflection to bypass access checks:
         *
         * JceSecurity.isRestricted = false;
         * JceSecurity.defaultPolicy.perms.clear();
         * JceSecurity.defaultPolicy.add(CryptoAllPermission.INSTANCE);
         */
        final Class<?> jceSecurity = Class.forName("javax.crypto.JceSecurity");
        final Class<?> cryptoPermissions = Class.forName("javax.crypto.CryptoPermissions");
        final Class<?> cryptoAllPermission = Class.forName("javax.crypto.CryptoAllPermission");

        final Field isRestrictedField = jceSecurity.getDeclaredField("isRestricted");
        isRestrictedField.setAccessible(true);
        final Field modifiersField = Field.class.getDeclaredField("modifiers");
        modifiersField.setAccessible(true);
        modifiersField.setInt(isRestrictedField, isRestrictedField.getModifiers() & ~Modifier.FINAL);
        isRestrictedField.set(null, false);

        final Field defaultPolicyField = jceSecurity.getDeclaredField("defaultPolicy");
        defaultPolicyField.setAccessible(true);
        final PermissionCollection defaultPolicy = (PermissionCollection) defaultPolicyField.get(null);

        final Field perms = cryptoPermissions.getDeclaredField("perms");
        perms.setAccessible(true);
        ((Map<?, ?>) perms.get(defaultPolicy)).clear();

        final Field instance = cryptoAllPermission.getDeclaredField("INSTANCE");
        instance.setAccessible(true);
        defaultPolicy.add((Permission) instance.get(null));

        logger.fine("Successfully removed cryptography restrictions");
    } catch (final Exception e) {
        logger.log(Level.WARNING, "Failed to remove cryptography restrictions", e);
    }
}

private static boolean isRestrictedCryptography() {
    // This matches Oracle Java 7 and 8, but not Java 9 or OpenJDK.
    final String name = System.getProperty("java.runtime.name");
    final String ver = System.getProperty("java.version");
    return name != null && name.equals("Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment")
            && ver != null && (ver.startsWith("1.7") || ver.startsWith("1.8"));
}

Simply call removeCryptographyRestrictions() from a static initializer or such before performing any cryptographic operations.

The JceSecurity.isRestricted = false part is all that is needed to use 256-bit ciphers directly; however, without the two other operations, Cipher.getMaxAllowedKeyLength() will still keep reporting 128, and 256-bit TLS cipher suites won't work.

This code works on Oracle Java 7 and 8, and automatically skips the process on Java 9 and OpenJDK where it's not needed. Being an ugly hack after all, it likely doesn't work on other vendors' VMs.

It also doesn't work on Oracle Java 6, because the private JCE classes are obfuscated there. The obfuscation does not change from version to version though, so it is still technically possible to support Java 6.

一紙繁鸢 2024-08-05 05:21:52

现在,Java 9 以及任何最新版本的 Java 6、7 或 8 都不再需要此功能。最后! :)

根据 JDK-8170157,现在默认启用无限制加密策略。

JIRA 问题的特定版本:

  • Java 9(10、11 等):任何官方版本!
  • Java 8u161 或更高版本(现在可用)
  • Java 7u171 或更高版本(只能通过“My Oracle Support”获得)
  • Java 6u181 或更高版本(只能通过“My Oracle Support”获得)

请注意,如果由于某种奇怪的原因Java 9 中需要旧的行为,可以使用以下方式设置:

Security.setProperty("crypto.policy", "limited");

This is now no longer needed for Java 9, nor for any recent release of Java 6, 7, or 8. Finally! :)

Per JDK-8170157, the unlimited cryptographic policy is now enabled by default.

Specific versions from the JIRA issue:

  • Java 9 (10, 11, etc..): Any official release!
  • Java 8u161 or later (Available now)
  • Java 7u171 or later (Only available through 'My Oracle Support')
  • Java 6u181 or later (Only available through 'My Oracle Support')

Note that if for some odd reason the old behavior is needed in Java 9, it can be set using:

Security.setProperty("crypto.policy", "limited");
此刻的回忆 2024-08-05 05:21:52

这是解决方案:http://middlesphere-1。 blogspot.ru/2014/06/this-code-allows-to-break-limit-if.html

//this code allows to break limit if client jdk/jre has no unlimited policy files for JCE.
//it should be run once. So this static section is always execute during the class loading process.
//this code is useful when working with Bouncycastle library.
static {
    try {
        Field field = Class.forName("javax.crypto.JceSecurity").getDeclaredField("isRestricted");
        field.setAccessible(true);
        field.set(null, java.lang.Boolean.FALSE);
    } catch (Exception ex) {
    }
}

Here is solution: http://middlesphere-1.blogspot.ru/2014/06/this-code-allows-to-break-limit-if.html

//this code allows to break limit if client jdk/jre has no unlimited policy files for JCE.
//it should be run once. So this static section is always execute during the class loading process.
//this code is useful when working with Bouncycastle library.
static {
    try {
        Field field = Class.forName("javax.crypto.JceSecurity").getDeclaredField("isRestricted");
        field.setAccessible(true);
        field.set(null, java.lang.Boolean.FALSE);
    } catch (Exception ex) {
    }
}
2024-08-05 05:21:52

从 JDK 8u102 开始,发布的依赖反射的解决方案将不再起作用:这些解决方案设置的字段现在是 final (https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8149417)。

看起来又回到了 (a) 使用 Bouncy Castle,或 (b) 安装 JCE 策略文件。

As of JDK 8u102, the posted solutions relying on reflection will no longer work: the field that these solutions set is now final (https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8149417).

Looks like it's back to either (a) using Bouncy Castle, or (b) installing the JCE policy files.

颜漓半夏 2024-08-05 05:21:52

据我所知,Bouncy Castle 仍然需要安装 jar。

我做了一个小测试,似乎证实了这一点:

http://www .bouncycastle.org/wiki/display/JA1/Frequently+Asked+Questions

Bouncy Castle still requires jars installed as far as I can tell.

I did a little test and it seemed to confirm this:

http://www.bouncycastle.org/wiki/display/JA1/Frequently+Asked+Questions

中性美 2024-08-05 05:21:52

对于替代加密库,请查看 Bouncy Castle。 它具有 AES 和许多附加功能。 这是一个自由的开源库。 不过,您必须使用轻量级的专有 Bouncy Castle API 才能实现此功能。

For an alternative cryptography library, have a look at Bouncy Castle. It has AES and a lot of added functionality. It's a liberal open source library. You will have to use the lightweight, proprietary Bouncy Castle API for this to work though.

口干舌燥 2024-08-05 05:21:52

您可以使用方法

javax.crypto.Cipher.getMaxAllowedKeyLength(String transformation)

来测试可用的密钥长度,使用它并通知用户发生了什么。 例如,由于未安装策略文件,您的应用程序将回退到 128 位密钥。 具有安全意识的用户将安装策略文件,其他人将继续使用较弱的密钥。

You could use method

javax.crypto.Cipher.getMaxAllowedKeyLength(String transformation)

to test the available key length, use that and inform the user about what is going on. Something stating that your application is falling back to 128 bit keys due to the policy files not being installed, for example. Security conscious users will install the policy files, others will continue using weaker keys.

分开我的手 2024-08-05 05:21:52

对于我们的应用程序,我们有一个客户端服务器架构,并且只允许在服务器级别解密/加密数据。 因此,仅在那里需要 JCE 文件。

我们遇到了另一个问题,我们需要通过 JNLP 更新客户端计算机上的安全 jar,它会在首次运行时覆盖 ${java.home}/lib/security/ 中的库和 JVM。

这让它发挥作用。

For our application, we had a client server architecture and we only allowed decrypting/encrypting data in the server level. Hence the JCE files are only needed there.

We had another problem where we needed to update a security jar on the client machines, through JNLP, it overwrites the libraries in${java.home}/lib/security/ and the JVM on first run.

That made it work.

橘虞初梦 2024-08-05 05:21:52

这是 ntoskrnl 答案的更新版本。
它还包含一个删除最终修饰符的函数,例如评论中提到的 Arjan

此版本适用于 JRE 8u111 或更高版本。

private static void removeCryptographyRestrictions() {
    if (!isRestrictedCryptography()) {
        return;
    }
    try {
        /*
         * Do the following, but with reflection to bypass access checks:
         * 
         * JceSecurity.isRestricted = false; JceSecurity.defaultPolicy.perms.clear();
         * JceSecurity.defaultPolicy.add(CryptoAllPermission.INSTANCE);
         */
        final Class<?> jceSecurity = Class.forName("javax.crypto.JceSecurity");
        final Class<?> cryptoPermissions = Class.forName("javax.crypto.CryptoPermissions");
        final Class<?> cryptoAllPermission = Class.forName("javax.crypto.CryptoAllPermission");

        Field isRestrictedField = jceSecurity.getDeclaredField("isRestricted");
        isRestrictedField.setAccessible(true);
        setFinalStatic(isRestrictedField, true);
        isRestrictedField.set(null, false);

        final Field defaultPolicyField = jceSecurity.getDeclaredField("defaultPolicy");
        defaultPolicyField.setAccessible(true);
        final PermissionCollection defaultPolicy = (PermissionCollection) defaultPolicyField.get(null);

        final Field perms = cryptoPermissions.getDeclaredField("perms");
        perms.setAccessible(true);
        ((Map<?, ?>) perms.get(defaultPolicy)).clear();

        final Field instance = cryptoAllPermission.getDeclaredField("INSTANCE");
        instance.setAccessible(true);
        defaultPolicy.add((Permission) instance.get(null));
    }
    catch (final Exception e) {
        e.printStackTrace();
    }
}

static void setFinalStatic(Field field, Object newValue) throws Exception {
      field.setAccessible(true);

      Field modifiersField = Field.class.getDeclaredField("modifiers");
      modifiersField.setAccessible(true);
      modifiersField.setInt(field, field.getModifiers() & ~Modifier.FINAL);

      field.set(null, newValue);
   }

private static boolean isRestrictedCryptography() {
    // This simply matches the Oracle JRE, but not OpenJDK.
    return "Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment".equals(System.getProperty("java.runtime.name"));
}

Here's a updated version of ntoskrnl answer.
It additionally contains a function to remove the final modifier like Arjan mentioned in the comments.

This version works with JRE 8u111 or newer.

private static void removeCryptographyRestrictions() {
    if (!isRestrictedCryptography()) {
        return;
    }
    try {
        /*
         * Do the following, but with reflection to bypass access checks:
         * 
         * JceSecurity.isRestricted = false; JceSecurity.defaultPolicy.perms.clear();
         * JceSecurity.defaultPolicy.add(CryptoAllPermission.INSTANCE);
         */
        final Class<?> jceSecurity = Class.forName("javax.crypto.JceSecurity");
        final Class<?> cryptoPermissions = Class.forName("javax.crypto.CryptoPermissions");
        final Class<?> cryptoAllPermission = Class.forName("javax.crypto.CryptoAllPermission");

        Field isRestrictedField = jceSecurity.getDeclaredField("isRestricted");
        isRestrictedField.setAccessible(true);
        setFinalStatic(isRestrictedField, true);
        isRestrictedField.set(null, false);

        final Field defaultPolicyField = jceSecurity.getDeclaredField("defaultPolicy");
        defaultPolicyField.setAccessible(true);
        final PermissionCollection defaultPolicy = (PermissionCollection) defaultPolicyField.get(null);

        final Field perms = cryptoPermissions.getDeclaredField("perms");
        perms.setAccessible(true);
        ((Map<?, ?>) perms.get(defaultPolicy)).clear();

        final Field instance = cryptoAllPermission.getDeclaredField("INSTANCE");
        instance.setAccessible(true);
        defaultPolicy.add((Permission) instance.get(null));
    }
    catch (final Exception e) {
        e.printStackTrace();
    }
}

static void setFinalStatic(Field field, Object newValue) throws Exception {
      field.setAccessible(true);

      Field modifiersField = Field.class.getDeclaredField("modifiers");
      modifiersField.setAccessible(true);
      modifiersField.setInt(field, field.getModifiers() & ~Modifier.FINAL);

      field.set(null, newValue);
   }

private static boolean isRestrictedCryptography() {
    // This simply matches the Oracle JRE, but not OpenJDK.
    return "Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment".equals(System.getProperty("java.runtime.name"));
}
醉殇 2024-08-05 05:21:52

以下是 @ntoskrnl 代码的修改版本,其中包含 检查的 isRestrictedCryptography实际的 Cipher.getMaxAllowedKeyLength、slf4j 日志记录以及对应用程序引导程序的单例初始化的支持如下所示:

static {
    UnlimitedKeyStrengthJurisdictionPolicy.ensure();
}

当 Java 8u162 中默认使用 @cranphin 的无限策略时,此代码将正确地停止通过反射进行破坏答案预测。


import org.slf4j.Logger;
import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory;

import javax.crypto.Cipher;
import java.lang.reflect.Field;
import java.lang.reflect.Modifier;
import java.security.NoSuchAlgorithmException;
import java.security.Permission;
import java.security.PermissionCollection;
import java.util.Map;

// https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1179672/how-to-avoid-installing-unlimited-strength-jce-policy-files-when-deploying-an
public class UnlimitedKeyStrengthJurisdictionPolicy {

    private static final Logger log = LoggerFactory.getLogger(UnlimitedKeyStrengthJurisdictionPolicy.class);

    private static boolean isRestrictedCryptography() throws NoSuchAlgorithmException {
        return Cipher.getMaxAllowedKeyLength("AES/ECB/NoPadding") <= 128;
    }

    private static void removeCryptographyRestrictions() {
        try {
            if (!isRestrictedCryptography()) {
                log.debug("Cryptography restrictions removal not needed");
                return;
            }
            /*
             * Do the following, but with reflection to bypass access checks:
             *
             * JceSecurity.isRestricted = false;
             * JceSecurity.defaultPolicy.perms.clear();
             * JceSecurity.defaultPolicy.add(CryptoAllPermission.INSTANCE);
             */
            Class<?> jceSecurity = Class.forName("javax.crypto.JceSecurity");
            Class<?> cryptoPermissions = Class.forName("javax.crypto.CryptoPermissions");
            Class<?> cryptoAllPermission = Class.forName("javax.crypto.CryptoAllPermission");

            Field isRestrictedField = jceSecurity.getDeclaredField("isRestricted");
            isRestrictedField.setAccessible(true);
            Field modifiersField = Field.class.getDeclaredField("modifiers");
            modifiersField.setAccessible(true);
            modifiersField.setInt(isRestrictedField, isRestrictedField.getModifiers() & ~Modifier.FINAL);
            isRestrictedField.set(null, false);

            Field defaultPolicyField = jceSecurity.getDeclaredField("defaultPolicy");
            defaultPolicyField.setAccessible(true);
            PermissionCollection defaultPolicy = (PermissionCollection) defaultPolicyField.get(null);

            Field perms = cryptoPermissions.getDeclaredField("perms");
            perms.setAccessible(true);
            ((Map<?, ?>) perms.get(defaultPolicy)).clear();

            Field instance = cryptoAllPermission.getDeclaredField("INSTANCE");
            instance.setAccessible(true);
            defaultPolicy.add((Permission) instance.get(null));

            log.info("Successfully removed cryptography restrictions");
        } catch (Exception e) {
            log.warn("Failed to remove cryptography restrictions", e);
        }
    }

    static {
        removeCryptographyRestrictions();
    }

    public static void ensure() {
        // just force loading of this class
    }
}

Here is a modified version of @ntoskrnl's code featuring isRestrictedCryptography check by actual Cipher.getMaxAllowedKeyLength, slf4j logging and support of singleton initialization from application bootstrap like this:

static {
    UnlimitedKeyStrengthJurisdictionPolicy.ensure();
}

This code would correctly stop mangling with reflection when unlimited policy becomes available by default in Java 8u162 as @cranphin's answer predicts.


import org.slf4j.Logger;
import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory;

import javax.crypto.Cipher;
import java.lang.reflect.Field;
import java.lang.reflect.Modifier;
import java.security.NoSuchAlgorithmException;
import java.security.Permission;
import java.security.PermissionCollection;
import java.util.Map;

// https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1179672/how-to-avoid-installing-unlimited-strength-jce-policy-files-when-deploying-an
public class UnlimitedKeyStrengthJurisdictionPolicy {

    private static final Logger log = LoggerFactory.getLogger(UnlimitedKeyStrengthJurisdictionPolicy.class);

    private static boolean isRestrictedCryptography() throws NoSuchAlgorithmException {
        return Cipher.getMaxAllowedKeyLength("AES/ECB/NoPadding") <= 128;
    }

    private static void removeCryptographyRestrictions() {
        try {
            if (!isRestrictedCryptography()) {
                log.debug("Cryptography restrictions removal not needed");
                return;
            }
            /*
             * Do the following, but with reflection to bypass access checks:
             *
             * JceSecurity.isRestricted = false;
             * JceSecurity.defaultPolicy.perms.clear();
             * JceSecurity.defaultPolicy.add(CryptoAllPermission.INSTANCE);
             */
            Class<?> jceSecurity = Class.forName("javax.crypto.JceSecurity");
            Class<?> cryptoPermissions = Class.forName("javax.crypto.CryptoPermissions");
            Class<?> cryptoAllPermission = Class.forName("javax.crypto.CryptoAllPermission");

            Field isRestrictedField = jceSecurity.getDeclaredField("isRestricted");
            isRestrictedField.setAccessible(true);
            Field modifiersField = Field.class.getDeclaredField("modifiers");
            modifiersField.setAccessible(true);
            modifiersField.setInt(isRestrictedField, isRestrictedField.getModifiers() & ~Modifier.FINAL);
            isRestrictedField.set(null, false);

            Field defaultPolicyField = jceSecurity.getDeclaredField("defaultPolicy");
            defaultPolicyField.setAccessible(true);
            PermissionCollection defaultPolicy = (PermissionCollection) defaultPolicyField.get(null);

            Field perms = cryptoPermissions.getDeclaredField("perms");
            perms.setAccessible(true);
            ((Map<?, ?>) perms.get(defaultPolicy)).clear();

            Field instance = cryptoAllPermission.getDeclaredField("INSTANCE");
            instance.setAccessible(true);
            defaultPolicy.add((Permission) instance.get(null));

            log.info("Successfully removed cryptography restrictions");
        } catch (Exception e) {
            log.warn("Failed to remove cryptography restrictions", e);
        }
    }

    static {
        removeCryptographyRestrictions();
    }

    public static void ensure() {
        // just force loading of this class
    }
}
无远思近则忧 2024-08-05 05:21:52

在安装程序期间,只需提示用户并下载 DOS 批处理脚本或 Bash shell 脚本并将 JCE 复制到正确的系统位置。

我曾经必须为服务器 Web 服务执行此操作,而不是正式的安装程序,我只是提供脚本来在用户运行应用程序之前设置应用程序。 您可以使应用程序无法运行,直到它们运行安装脚本。 您还可以让应用程序抱怨 JCE 丢失,然后要求下载并重新启动应用程序?

During installation of your program, just prompt the user and have a DOS Batch script or a Bash shell script download and copy the JCE into the proper system location.

I used to have to do this for a server webservice and instead of a formal installer, I just provided scripts to setup the app before the user could run it. You can make the app un-runnable until they run the setup script. You could also make the app complain that the JCE is missing and then ask to download and restart the app?

~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文