Notes/Domino DXL 无法表达的内容的示例？
每当讨论 Lotus Notes 开发中的源代码控制时，都会说 DXL 数据的导出-导入循环不会为您提供与开始时相同的设计 - 因此任何依赖 DXL 的系统都会失败。
我没有理由怀疑这一点，因为 DXL 格式似乎是一个移动目标，并且始终落后于 Domino Designer 可以表达的内容，但是：
有人有 DXL 无法表达的内容的具体示例吗？
Whenever source control in Lotus Notes development is discussed, it is said that an export-import cycle of DXL data doesn't give you the same design as you started with - thus any system relying on DXL will fail.
I have no reason to doubt this, since the DXL format seems to be a moving target and constantly a step behind what the Domino Designer can express, but:
Does anybody have a specific example of what DXL cannot express?
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（3）
如果您不想在 Domino Designer 之外实际编辑任何内容，现在可以使用 DXL 进行源代码管理。 通过将元素导出和导入为原始 NoteFormat 来完成此操作。
对于 DXL 格式，您可以在 DD 之外使用它，您可能会在很多地方出错。 我没有对 DXL 做过任何过于激进的事情，因此其他人也许能够为您提供更好的细节。 此处讨论了相当多的内容
You can use DXL for Source Control right now if you don't want to actually edit anything out side of Domino Designer. Do this by exporting and importing elements as raw NoteFormat.
For DXL in a format that you can mess about with outside of DD you can trip up in quite a few places. I've not done anything too aggressive with DXL, so others might be able to give you better specifics. Quite a few are discussed here
openntf 项目 Design Catalog 可用于版本控制。 www.openntf.org/projects/pmt.nsf/ProjectLookup/DesignCatalog
在lotusphere，lotus911 的人提到他们将Design Catalog 与Trigger Happy 结合使用。 www.openntf.org/projects/pmt.nsf/ProjectLookup/Trigger%20Happy
The openntf project Design Catalog can be used for version control. www.openntf.org/projects/pmt.nsf/ProjectLookup/DesignCatalog
At lotusphere the lotus911 people mentioned they used the Design Catalog in combination with Trigger Happy. www.openntf.org/projects/pmt.nsf/ProjectLookup/Trigger%20Happy
我知道 Web 服务脚本代码未导出到 DXL 中存在问题。 我确信这只是众多之一。 IBM 表示，他们的目标是“有一天”使 DXL 设计导出 100%“可往返”，但即使是 8.5 也还没有实现。 有一个很好的讨论 这里，由开发人员发布的设计元素不完全保真导出。
I know there was an issue with Web Service script code not being exported in DXL. I'm sure that's only one of many. IBM has stated they have a goal of "someday" making DXL design exports 100% "round-trippable", but even with 8.5 are not there yet. There is a good discussion here, with postings by developers of design elements which do not export in full fidelity.