Google Code 或 SourceForge 适合较小的 XCode、Objective-C 项目?

发布于 2024-07-29 01:56:45 字数 204 浏览 12 评论 0原文

哪个存储库更适合托管小型 XCode、基于 Objective-C 的项目? 两者似乎都提供 XCode 喜欢的 SVN。 文档和问题跟踪系统肯定可以容纳一个小型项目。 Google 搜索显示了许多更喜欢 Google Code 的观点,但动机似乎有点 2006 年的风格。

您是否正在托管或参与在任一平台上托管的项目? 您会推荐哪一个,为什么? 谢谢!

Which would be a more appropriate repository to host a small, XCode, Objective-C based project? Both appear to offer SVN, which XCode likes. The documentation and issue tracking systems would surely accommodate a small project. A Google search surfaces a number of opinions preferring Google Code, but the motivations seem to be somewhat 2006-ish.

Are you hosting or participating in a project hosted on either platform? Which would you recommend and why? Thanks!

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(3

冷情妓 2024-08-05 01:56:45

我已经使用 SF 几年了,现在我正在切换到 Google Code。 我喜欢 Google 的错误跟踪器(现在有 API!),我喜欢代码审查功能、Mercurial 项目的服务器端克隆。 而且 Google Code 速度很快。 我不喜欢SF变得越来越慢,UI变得越来越奇怪。 SF 追踪器和论坛上的搜索也很糟糕。

I've been using SF for a few years and now I am switching to Google Code. I like Google's bug tracker (which now has API!), I like code reviews feature, server-side cloning of Mercurial projects. And Google Code is just fast. I don't like that SF becomes slower and slower and its UI becomes more and more strange. Search on SF trackers and forums sucks too.

天气好吗我好吗 2024-08-05 01:56:45

XCode 的 svn 支持充其量只是粗略的,所以我不一定会为此给予 svn 加分。

我使用 Unfuddle,它确实具有 svn 支持、问题跟踪、发布计划并支持多个项目。

我碰巧使用 git 作为我的源代码管理格式,它也适用于 Unfuddle,但这实际上只是因为我想学习使用 git。

XCode's svn support is sketchy at best, so I would not necessarily give svn bonus points for this.

I use Unfuddle, which does have svn support, issue tracking, release planning and supports multiple projects.

I happen to use git as my source control format, which also works with Unfuddle, but that was really only becasue I wanted to learn to use git.

一身骄傲 2024-08-05 01:56:45

我刚刚登录 XP-Dev 以获取免费 SVN 托管。 它也全部关闭了,我不能对谷歌代码说同样的话(任何人都可以验证他们是否让你关闭它吗?)。 与其他帖子类似,内置的 SVN 支持很痛苦。 也就是说,我使用它,但由于构建文件夹被签入和其他东西,我确实不得不多次重做服务器。

I have just signed on to XP-Dev for free SVN hosting. It's all closed too, which I can't say the same for google code (can anyone verify if they let you have it closed?). Similar to other posts, the built in SVN support is a pain. That said, I use it, but I did have to redo the server a number of times because of build folders getting checked in and other stuff.

~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文