Performance Center 添加了一个 Web 应用程序来安排各种 LoadRunner 计算机上的时间。 分配时间还意味着分配已购买的“vuser”数量。
Performance Center runs multiple copies of LoadRunner.
Performance Center adds a web app to schedules time on the various LoadRunner machines. Allocating time also implies allocating the number of "vusers" that has been purchased.
As indicated by the previous post LoadRunner is performance and load testing. Performance center (which includes LoadRunner) is supposed to be a complete performance management solution. Performance center is HORIFICALLY expensive and from what I can see a number of the so-called features simply address some of the licensing restrictions in LoadRunner. It also appears that not a lot of organisations use Performance Center so HP don't have much expertise. If you just want performance and load testing without all the hassles then Borland SilkPerformer is a better option.
还应注意，Performance Center 和 LoadRunner 控制器之间存在与远程访问相关的显着许可证差异。 默认情况下，Performance Center 允许，但 LoadRunner 控制器不允许。 请不要相信我的话，请检查您的 LoadRunner 副本的许可证文本。 这些限制已经存在了十年的大部分时间。
It should also be noted that significant license differences exist between Performance Center and LoadRunner controller related to remote access. By default Performance Center allows it, the LoadRunner controller does not. Please do not take my word for it, examine the license text for your copy of LoadRunner. These constraints have been in place for the better part of a decade.
Well Performance center 是一种先进的基于网络的性能测试管理工具。 然而，就许可和部署而言，它比 Loadrunner 更昂贵。 但它提供了管理性能测试任务的便利性。 您可以通过调度窗口安排多个测试，并根据调度程序计时，您可以分配不同的场景在该时间点运行。
Hp Loadrunner 提供了在任何时间点运行和安排单个场景的工具。 然而，我们不能忽视 Loadrunner 的优点——即它很容易管理和安排运行并监控结果。 而在性能中心，新用户可能很难安排和运行测试并在测试后整理结果。
我建议这两个工具都很好用。
Well Performance center is an advanced web based performance test management tool. however it is costlier than the Loadrunner in terms of license and deployment. But it provides the ease of managing performance testing task. You can schedule multiple tests through the scheduling window and according to the scheduler timing you can assign different scenarios to run at that point of time.
Hp Loadrunner provides the facility to run and schedule a single scenario at any point of time. However we cannot ignore the good things in Loadrunner --i.e it is easy to manage and schedule a run and monitor the results. Whereas in Performance center it may be difficult for new users to schedule and run a test and collate the results after the test.
I would suggest that Both the tools are good in use.
发布评论
评论（4）
Performance Center 运行 LoadRunner 的多个副本。
Performance Center 添加了一个 Web 应用程序来安排各种 LoadRunner 计算机上的时间。 分配时间还意味着分配已购买的“vuser”数量。
Performance Center runs multiple copies of LoadRunner.
Performance Center adds a web app to schedules time on the various LoadRunner machines. Allocating time also implies allocating the number of "vusers" that has been purchased.
正如上一篇文章所示，LoadRunner 是性能和负载测试。 性能中心（包括LoadRunner）应该是一个完整的性能管理解决方案。
性能中心非常昂贵，而且据我所知，许多所谓的功能只是解决了 LoadRunner 中的一些许可限制。 而且似乎没有很多组织使用 Performance Center，因此 HP 没有太多专业知识。
如果您只想进行性能和负载测试而不需要任何麻烦，那么 Borland SilkPerformer 是更好的选择。
As indicated by the previous post LoadRunner is performance and load testing. Performance center (which includes LoadRunner) is supposed to be a complete performance management solution.
Performance center is HORIFICALLY expensive and from what I can see a number of the so-called features simply address some of the licensing restrictions in LoadRunner. It also appears that not a lot of organisations use Performance Center so HP don't have much expertise.
If you just want performance and load testing without all the hassles then Borland SilkPerformer is a better option.
还应注意，Performance Center 和 LoadRunner 控制器之间存在与远程访问相关的显着许可证差异。 默认情况下，Performance Center 允许，但 LoadRunner 控制器不允许。 请不要相信我的话，请检查您的 LoadRunner 副本的许可证文本。 这些限制已经存在了十年的大部分时间。
It should also be noted that significant license differences exist between Performance Center and LoadRunner controller related to remote access. By default Performance Center allows it, the LoadRunner controller does not. Please do not take my word for it, examine the license text for your copy of LoadRunner. These constraints have been in place for the better part of a decade.
Well Performance center 是一种先进的基于网络的性能测试管理工具。 然而，就许可和部署而言，它比 Loadrunner 更昂贵。 但它提供了管理性能测试任务的便利性。 您可以通过调度窗口安排多个测试，并根据调度程序计时，您可以分配不同的场景在该时间点运行。
Hp Loadrunner 提供了在任何时间点运行和安排单个场景的工具。 然而，我们不能忽视 Loadrunner 的优点——即它很容易管理和安排运行并监控结果。 而在性能中心，新用户可能很难安排和运行测试并在测试后整理结果。
我建议这两个工具都很好用。
Well Performance center is an advanced web based performance test management tool. however it is costlier than the Loadrunner in terms of license and deployment. But it provides the ease of managing performance testing task. You can schedule multiple tests through the scheduling window and according to the scheduler timing you can assign different scenarios to run at that point of time.
Hp Loadrunner provides the facility to run and schedule a single scenario at any point of time. However we cannot ignore the good things in Loadrunner --i.e it is easy to manage and schedule a run and monitor the results. Whereas in Performance center it may be difficult for new users to schedule and run a test and collate the results after the test.
I would suggest that Both the tools are good in use.