带有线程/回复的私人消息系统

发布于 2024-07-28 22:03:28 字数 708 浏览 6 评论 0原文

我目前正在创建一个私人消息系统(PHP/MySQL),其中用户可以一次向多个收件人发送消息,然后这些用户可以决定回复。

这是我目前正在处理的内容:

tbl_pm tbl:
id
date_sent
title
content
status ENUM ('unread', 'read') DEFAULT 'unread'

tblpm_info tbl:
id
message_id
sender_id
receiver_id

但是,我需要一些帮助来确定两件事的逻辑:

1)创建新消息时,“id”应该自动递增吗? 如果两个表中的“id”列都设置为自动递增,那么如何在“关系表”中设置“message_id”列?

例如,当创建一条新消息时,我的MySQL语句如下:

<?php
mysql_query("INSERT INTO `tblpm` (title, content, sender_id, date_sent) VALUES ('$subject', '$message', '$sender', NOW())" );

在同一条语句中,如何将tblpm的“自动递增”值输入到tblpm_info“message_id”字段中?

2)当用户回复消息时,我的MySQL语句应该是什么样子?

也许我让这件事变得比我需要的更复杂。 任何帮助是极大的赞赏!

I'm currently working on creating a private messaging system, (PHP/MySQL) in which users can send message to multiple recipients at one time, and those users can then decide to reply.

Here's what I'm currently working with:

tbl_pm tbl:
id
date_sent
title
content
status ENUM ('unread', 'read') DEFAULT 'unread'

tblpm_info tbl:
id
message_id
sender_id
receiver_id

However, I need some help determining the logic on two things:

1) When a new message is created, should the "id" be auto-increment? If the 'id' column is set to auto-increment in both tables, how would I set the "message_id" column in the 'relation table'?

For example, when a new message is created, my MySQL statement is as follows:

<?php
mysql_query("INSERT INTO `tblpm` (title, content, sender_id, date_sent) VALUES ('$subject', '$message', '$sender', NOW())" );

In the same statement, how would I enter the 'auto-incremented' value of tblpm into the tblpm_info "message_id" field?

2) What should my MySQL statement look like when users reply to messages?

Perhaps I am making this more complicated than I need to. Any help is greatly appreciated!

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(6

烟花易冷人易散 2024-08-04 22:03:28

1)肯定是的,id 应该自动递增,除非您提供唯一的主键的不同方式。 您可以直接从 mysql 使用 mysql_insert_id()LAST_INSERT_ID() 获取插入的 id,因此要发布一些连接信息,您可以执行 或

   mysql_query("INSERT INTO table1 ...")
   $foreign_key=mysql_insert_id(); //this gives you the last auto-increment for YOUR connection

,但前提是您绝对确定没有其他人同时写入表或控制事务,插入后执行:

$foreign_key=mysql_query("SELECT LAST_INSERT_ID()")
INSERT INTO table2 message_id=$foreign_key

或者,不将 FK 拉到 php,所有这些都在一个事务中(我还建议将 SQL 包装为事务也)类似:

"INSERT INTO table1...; INSERT INTO table2 (message_id,...) VALUES(LAST_INSERT_ID(),...)"

根据您的语言和 mysql 库,您可能无法发出多查询方法,因此您最好使用第一种方法。

2)这可以有很多方法,具体取决于您是否也需要回复所有收件人(例如会议),以类似线程/论坛的方式回复,客户端是否可以存储最后检索到的消息/id(例如在 cookie 中;也会影响您是否真的需要“读取”字段)。

“私人聊天”方法是最简单的一种,然后您可能最好将消息存储在一个表中,并将“从-到”关系存储到另一个表中(并在它们上使用 JOIN),或者简单地将消息重新填充到一个表中表(因为现在存储很便宜)。 因此,简单化的模型将是一张表:(

table: message_body,from,to
$recepients=array(1,2,3..);
foreach($recepients as $recepient)
 mysql_query("INSERT INTO table (...,message_body,from,to) VALUES(...,$from,$recepient)");

复制消息等,仅接收者更改)

message_table: id,when,message_body
to-from-table: id,msg_id,from,to

$recepients=array(1,2,3,...);
mysql_insert("INSERT INTO message_table (when,message_body) VALUES(NOW(),$body)");
$msg_id=mysql_insert_id();
foreach($recepients as $recepient)
 mysql_query("INSERT INTO to-from-table (msg_id,from,to) VALUES($msg_id,$from,$recepient)");

(插入一次消息,存储所有接收者的关系和 FK)

然后每个客户端存储他/她收到的最后一个 message_id(默认为0),并假设所有先前的消息已阅读):

"SELECT * FROM message WHERE from=$user_id OR to=$user_id WHERE $msg_id>$last_msg_id"

或者我们只是记下用户的最后输入时间并查询此后的任何新消息:

"SELECT * FROM message WHERE from=$user_id OR to=$user_id WHERE when>='".date('Y-m-d H:i:s',$last_input_time)."' "

如果您需要更多类似会议或论坛的方法,并且需要跟踪谁阅读了消息或没有跟踪消息,您可能需要跟踪所有涉及的用户。

假设一次“多用户会议”中不会有一百多人,我会使用一张表来存储消息,并使用我经常使用的“逗号分隔和换行列表”技巧来存储标签。

id autoincrement (again, no need for a separate message id)
your usual: sent_at, title (if you need one), content
sender (int)
recepients (I'd go with varchar or shorter versions of TEXT; whereas TEXT or BLOB gives you unlimited number of users but may have impact on performance)
readers (same as above)

收件人/读者字段的秘密是填充它们以逗号分隔的 ID 列表,并再次用逗号将其括起来(稍后我将详细解释原因)。

因此,您必须再次将收件人的 id 收集到数组中,例如 $recepients=array(2,3,5) 并修改您的插入:

"INSERT INTO table (sent_at,title,content,sender,recepients) VALUES(NOW(),'$title','$content',$sender_id,',".implode(',', $recepients).",')"

您会得到像
这样的表行
... 发件人 | 收件人
...          1 | ,2, //单个用户消息
...          1 | ,3,5, //多用户消息

,用于选择 id 为 $user_id=2 的用户的所有消息

SELECT * FROM table WHERE sender=$user_id OR INSTR(recepients, ',$user_id,')

之前我们包装了内爆的收件人列表,例如 '5,2,3' 变为 ' ,5,2,3,' 和 INSTR 这里告诉您 ',2,' 是否作为子字符串包含在某处 - 因为仅搜索 '2',',2' 或 '2,' 可能会给您带来误报,例如 '相应地 234,56','1**,234','9,452,**89' - 这就是为什么我们必须将列表包装在第一名。

当用户阅读/接收他/她的消息时,您将他们的 id 附加到读者列表中,例如:

UPDATE table SET readers=CONCAT(',',TRIM(TRAILING ',' FROM readers),',$user_id,') WHERE id=${initial message_id here}

这会导致:

... 收件人| 读者
...          1 | ,2,             | ,2,
...          1 | ,3,5,           | ,3,5,2,

或者我们现在可以修改初始查询,添加一列“is_read”来说明用户之前是否阅读过该消息:

SELECT * FROM table WHERE INSTR(recepients, ',$user_id,'),INSTR(readers, ',$user_id,') AS is_read

从结果中收集消息 ID 并将“recepients”字段更新为 1去

"UPDATE table SET readers=CONCAT(',',TRIM(TRAILING ',' FROM readers),',$user_id,') WHERE id IN (".implode(',' ,$received_msg_ids).")"

1) Definetely yes, id's should be auto-autoincremented unless you provide a different means of a primary key which is unique. You get the id of the insert either with mysql_insert_id() or LAST_INSERT_ID() from mysql directly, so to post some connected info you can do either

   mysql_query("INSERT INTO table1 ...")
   $foreign_key=mysql_insert_id(); //this gives you the last auto-increment for YOUR connection

or, but only if you're absolutely sure no one else writes to the table in the mean time or have control over the transaction, after insert do:

$foreign_key=mysql_query("SELECT LAST_INSERT_ID()")
INSERT INTO table2 message_id=$foreign_key

or, without pulling the FK to php, all in one transaction (I also advice to wrap the SQL as a transaction too) with something like:

"INSERT INTO table1...; INSERT INTO table2 (message_id,...) VALUES(LAST_INSERT_ID(),...)"

Depending on your language and mysql libraries, you might not be able to issue the multi-query approach, so you're better off with using the first approach.

2) This can have so many approaches, depending on if you need to reply to all the recepients too (e.g. conference), reply in a thread/forum-like manner, whether the client-side can store the last retrieved message/id (e.g. in a cookie; also affecting whether you really need the "read" field).

The "private chat" approach is the easiest one, you then are probably better off either storing the message in one table and the from-to relationships into an other (and use JOINs on them), or simply re-populate the message in one table (since storage is cheap nowadays). So, the simplistic model would be one table:

table: message_body,from,to
$recepients=array(1,2,3..);
foreach($recepients as $recepient)
 mysql_query("INSERT INTO table (...,message_body,from,to) VALUES(...,$from,$recepient)");

(duplicate the message etc, only the recepient changes)

or

message_table: id,when,message_body
to-from-table: id,msg_id,from,to

$recepients=array(1,2,3,...);
mysql_insert("INSERT INTO message_table (when,message_body) VALUES(NOW(),$body)");
$msg_id=mysql_insert_id();
foreach($recepients as $recepient)
 mysql_query("INSERT INTO to-from-table (msg_id,from,to) VALUES($msg_id,$from,$recepient)");

(message inserted once, store the relations and FK for all recepients)

Each client then stores the last message_id he/she received (default to 0), and assume all previous messages already read):

"SELECT * FROM message WHERE from=$user_id OR to=$user_id WHERE $msg_id>$last_msg_id"

or we just take note of the last input time from the user and query any new messages from then on:

"SELECT * FROM message WHERE from=$user_id OR to=$user_id WHERE when>='".date('Y-m-d H:i:s',$last_input_time)."' "

If you need a more conference- or forum-tread-like approach, and need to keep track of who read the message or not, you may need to keep track of all the users involved.

Assuming there won't be hundred-something people in one "multi-user conference" I'd go with one table for messages and the "comma-separated and wrapped list" trick I use a lot for storing tags.

id autoincrement (again, no need for a separate message id)
your usual: sent_at, title (if you need one), content
sender (int)
recepients (I'd go with varchar or shorter versions of TEXT; whereas TEXT or BLOB gives you unlimited number of users but may have impact on performance)
readers (same as above)

The secret for recepients/readers field is to populate them comma-separated id list and wrap it in commas again (I'll dulge into why later).

So you'd have to collect ids of recepients into an array again, e.g. $recepients=array(2,3,5) and modify your insert:

"INSERT INTO table (sent_at,title,content,sender,recepients) VALUES(NOW(),'$title','$content',$sender_id,',".implode(',', $recepients).",')"

you get table rows like
... sender | recepients
...          1 | ,2, //single user message
...          1 | ,3,5, //multi user message

to select all messages for a user with the id of $user_id=2 you go with

SELECT * FROM table WHERE sender=$user_id OR INSTR(recepients, ',$user_id,')

Previously we wrapped the imploded list of recepients, e.g. '5,2,3' becomes ',5,2,3,' and INSTR here tells if ',2,' is contained somewhere as a substring - since seeking for just '2',',2' or '2,' could give you false positives on e.g. '234,56','1**,234','9,452,**89' accordingly - that's why we had to wrap the list in the first place.

When the user reads/receives his/her message, you append their id to the readers list like:

UPDATE table SET readers=CONCAT(',',TRIM(TRAILING ',' FROM readers),',$user_id,') WHERE id=${initial message_id here}

which results in:

... sender | recepients | readers
...          1 | ,2,              | ,2,
...          1 | ,3,5,           | ,3,5,2,

Or we now can modify the initial query adding a column "is_read" to state whether the user previously read the message or not:

SELECT * FROM table WHERE INSTR(recepients, ',$user_id,'),INSTR(readers, ',$user_id,') AS is_read

collect the message-ids from the result and update the "recepients" fields with one go

"UPDATE table SET readers=CONCAT(',',TRIM(TRAILING ',' FROM readers),',$user_id,') WHERE id IN (".implode(',' ,$received_msg_ids).")"
合久必婚 2024-08-04 22:03:28

您不应依赖两个 ID 的自动增量,因为两个用户可能几乎同时发布两条消息。 如果第一个脚本将数据插入到 tbl_pm 表中,则第二个脚本会在第一个脚本完成之前执行其 tbl_pmtblpm_info 插入操作在其 tblpm_info 插入中,第一个脚本的两个数据库插入将具有不同的 ID。

除此之外,您的数据库结构似乎没有很好地组织手头的任务。 假设您的消息可能很长,并且发送给大量用户,那么理想的情况是将消息内容存储一次,并且为每个收件人提供未读状态、阅读时间等。例如:

CREATE TABLE `pm_data` (
  `id` smallint(5) unsigned NOT NULL auto_increment,
  `date_sent` timestamp NOT NULL,
  `title` varchar(255)
  `sender_id` smallint(5) unsigned,
  `parent_message_id` smallint(5) unsigned,
  `content` text,
  PRIMARY_KEY (`id`)
);
CREATE TABLE `pm_info` (
  `id` smallint(5) unsigned NOT NULL auto_increment,
  `pm_id` smallint(5) unsigned NOT NULL,
  `recipient_id` smallint(5) unsigned,
  `read` tinyint(1) unsigned default 0,
  `read_date` timestamp,
  PRIMARY_KEY (`id`)
);

创建这两个表,并注意它们都有一个设置为自动递增的 'id' 值,但 'info' 表还有一个 pm_id 字段,该字段将保存它所记录的 'data' 行的 ID 号指的是,这样您就可以确定“info”表中的每一行都有一个可用于选择的主键。

如果您想要使用 MySQL 建立真正的关系数据库,请确保您的引擎设置为 InnoDB,它允许在表之间建立关系,因此(例如)如果您尝试将某些内容插入到引用的“info”表中如果“data”表中不存在 pm_id,则 INSERT 将失败。

选择数据库结构后,您的 PHP 代码将如下所示:

 <?php
 // Store these in variables such that if they change, you don't need to edit all your queries
 $data_table = 'data_table';
 $info_table = 'info_table';
 mysql_query("INSERT INTO `$data_table` (title, content, sender_id, date_sent) VALUES ('$subject', '$message', '$sender', NOW())" );
 $pmid = mysql_insert_id(); // Get the inserted ID
 foreach ($recipent_list as $recipient) {
      mysql_query("INSERT INTO `$info_table` (pm_id, recipient_id) VALUES ('$pmid', '$recipient')" );
 }

You should not rely on auto-increment on both IDs due to the possibility of two users posting two messages at nearly the same time. If the first script inserts data into the tbl_pm table, then the second script manages to execute both its tbl_pm and tblpm_info inserts before the first script completes its tblpm_info insert, the first script's two database inserts will have different IDs.

Aside from that, your database structure doesn't seem well organized for the task at hand. Assuming your messages could be very long, and sent to a very large number of users, it would be ideal to have the message content stored once, and for each recipient have unread status, read time, etc. For example:

CREATE TABLE `pm_data` (
  `id` smallint(5) unsigned NOT NULL auto_increment,
  `date_sent` timestamp NOT NULL,
  `title` varchar(255)
  `sender_id` smallint(5) unsigned,
  `parent_message_id` smallint(5) unsigned,
  `content` text,
  PRIMARY_KEY (`id`)
);
CREATE TABLE `pm_info` (
  `id` smallint(5) unsigned NOT NULL auto_increment,
  `pm_id` smallint(5) unsigned NOT NULL,
  `recipient_id` smallint(5) unsigned,
  `read` tinyint(1) unsigned default 0,
  `read_date` timestamp,
  PRIMARY_KEY (`id`)
);

Create these two tables, and notice both of them have an 'id' value set to auto-increment, but the 'info' table also has a pm_id field that would hold the ID number of the 'data' row that it refers to, such that you're sure each row has a primary key in the 'info' table that you can use to select from.

If you want a true relational database setup using MySQL, make sure your engine is set to InnoDB, which allows relationships to be set up between tables, so (for example) if you try to insert something into the 'info' table that refers to a pm_id that doesn't exist in the 'data' table, the INSERT will fail.

Once you've chosen a database structure, then your PHP code would look something like:

 <?php
 // Store these in variables such that if they change, you don't need to edit all your queries
 $data_table = 'data_table';
 $info_table = 'info_table';
 mysql_query("INSERT INTO `$data_table` (title, content, sender_id, date_sent) VALUES ('$subject', '$message', '$sender', NOW())" );
 $pmid = mysql_insert_id(); // Get the inserted ID
 foreach ($recipent_list as $recipient) {
      mysql_query("INSERT INTO `$info_table` (pm_id, recipient_id) VALUES ('$pmid', '$recipient')" );
 }
羁拥 2024-08-04 22:03:28

是的。 你肯定会在两个 id 上设置 auto_increment 。

要设置 message_id,您可以通过编程方式将其插入其中。

您的查询将如下所示:

mysql_query("INSERT INTO `tblpm` (title, content, sender_id, date_sent) VALUES ('$subject', '$message', '$sender', NOW())" );

请注意,它是相同的! 如果 id 设置为 auto_increment,它将为您发挥所有作用。

Yes. You would definitely set auto_increment on both of the ids.

To set the message_id you would programatically insert it in there.

Your query would look like this:

mysql_query("INSERT INTO `tblpm` (title, content, sender_id, date_sent) VALUES ('$subject', '$message', '$sender', NOW())" );

Notice it's the same! If the id is set to auto_increment it will do all the magic for you.

毁虫ゝ 2024-08-04 22:03:28

在普通的 PHP/Mysql 调用中, mysql_insert_id() 返回上一个 INSERT 操作的自动递增值

因此,您插入消息,收集新生成的 ID,并将该值放入另一个表中。

In plain PHP/Mysql calls, mysql_insert_id() returns the auto-incremented value from the previous INSERT operation

So, you insert the message, collect the newly generated ID, and put that value into the other table.

晨敛清荷 2024-08-04 22:03:28

就您个人而言(假设示例没有简化,并且没有更多我看不到的内容),我会将这两个表中的数据存储在一个表中,因为它们似乎直接相关:

tbl_pm tbl:

message_id

date_sent

title

content

status ENUM ('unread', 'read') DEFAULT 'unread'

sender_id

receive_id

所以你最终会得到类似上面的结果,实际上不需要连接,因为关系总是 1 对 1? 您在 tbl_pm 表中已读/未读,每个收件人肯定会更改该表,这意味着无论如何您都必须为每个收件人存储邮件的副本。 也许 staus 应该在 tbl_pm 信息表中。

如果您确实想插入到两个表中,请尝试在查询中使用 last_insert_id() 或
如上所述,来自 php.ini 中的 mysql_insert_id()

Personally in your case (providing the example was not simplified and there is not more I cannot see) I would store the data from both of those table in a single table, as they appear to be directly related:

tbl_pm tbl:

message_id

date_sent

title

content

status ENUM ('unread', 'read') DEFAULT 'unread'

sender_id

receiver_id

So you end up with something like the above, there is not really any need for the join as the relationship is always going to be 1 to 1? You have read / unread in the tbl_pm table which would surely be changed per recipient, meaning you are having to store a copy of the message for each recipient anyway. perhaps staus is supposed to be in the tbl_pm info table.

If you do want to insert into both tables try using last_insert_id() within a query or
mysql_insert_id() as explained above, from within php.

花之痕靓丽 2024-08-04 22:03:28

我可能会做类似于加文建议的事情,但如果您想要线程消息,则必须添加另一个键,如下所示:

private_messages
- title (text)
- date (timestamp)
- content (text)
- status (enum)
- sender_id (int)
- receiver_id (int)
- parent_message_id (int)

然后您可以在没有单独的表或系统的情况下嵌套消息。

I'd probably do something similar to what gavin recommended, but if you wanted threaded messages, you'd have to add another key, like this:

private_messages
- title (text)
- date (timestamp)
- content (text)
- status (enum)
- sender_id (int)
- receiver_id (int)
- parent_message_id (int)

Then you could have nested messages without a separate table or system.

~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文