计划oracle收购sun - 告别mysql？
现在股东已经投票，oracle 将接管 SUNW，有谁知道这对 mysql 用户的影响吗？ 如果你没有事实，我想猜想也会很有趣（但请这样标记）。
我担心当原来的 mysql 团队卖给 SUN 时会发生什么（我不怪他们 - 我也会拿走利润）。 看起来最坏的情况正在发生。 我们需要一个开源的 RDBMS - 尽管我不使用他们的产品，但我还是决定开始支持 postgresql。 开源竞争导致了主要数据库系统免费版本的兴起，我认为保持重要的开源存在非常重要。
我有一个使用 MySQL 的非常小的系统。 有谁知道我是否/何时需要转换为其他东西？
相关说明 - postgresql 现在支持 CTE - postgresql。 以下是对收购 sun 的引用，< a href="http://www.oracle.com/us/corporate/press/018363" rel="nofollow noreferrer">oracle
Now that the shareholders have voted and oracle will be taking over SUNW, does anyone have any facts about the implication for mysql users? If you don't have facts, I suppose conjecture would be interesting as well (but please label it so).
I was afraid of what would happen when the original mysql team sold out to SUN (I don't blame them - I would have taken the profits too). It looks like the worst case scenario is happening. We need an open source rdbms - I've decided to start supporting postgresql even though I don't use their product. Open source competition has lead to the rise of free versions of the major database systems and I think it's important to keep a significant open source presence alive.
I have a very minor system that uses MySQL. Does anyone have any insight as to if/when I need to convert to something else?
On a related note - postgresql supports CTEs now - postgresql.
Here are the references to the buyout sun, oracle
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（5）
MySQL一团糟！
有Sun分支，叫MySQL，但是MySQL AB的大部分MySQL开发人员都离开了。 Maria DB是一支，还有Drizzle。
我确信它不会变得更好，但是竞争是健康的，并且有充分的理由抽象你的代码以确保后端可移植性
在不太相关的领域似乎有越来越多的粉丝主义数据库，例如 CouchDB 和 Hadoop/Google 风格的分布式表。
继续查看新闻并抽象后端
MySQL is a mess!
there is the Sun branch, called MySQL, but most of the MySQL developers from MySQL AB have left. Maria DB is one branch, and Drizzle.
Im sure it won't get any better, but competition is healthy and good reason to abstract your code to ensure backend portability
There seems to be growing fanboyism in the lesser-relational databases such as CouchDB and Hadoop/Google style distributed tables.
Keep looking at news and abstracting the backend
一些提示：
那么...别担心，因为他们关闭 MySQL 并没有什么意思。 不管怎样，如果出现问题，社区会神奇地创建一个 MySQL 的分支，因为 GPL 许可证。
Some tips:
Then... Don't worry because it's not interesting for them to close MySQL. Anyway, If something is wrong, magically the community will create a fork of MySQL because GPL license.
猜想——MySQL 不会消失。 Oracle 希望选择 Sun，因为 Java 和 Oracle 在同一领域被广泛使用，但 MySQL 并不与 Oracle 竞争。 您不会运行 MySQL 银行软件，也不会花费 100 万美元购买许可证来支持您的漫画 PHPbb 讨论论坛（活跃用户：2，包括您自己）。
Oracle 很可能会继续开发 MySQL，以便他们拥有既能占领低端市场又能占领高端市场的产品。
Conjecture - MySQL isn't going away. Oracle wanted Sun because Java and Oracle is used a lot in the same area, but MySQL isn't competeing with Oracle. You aren't going to run your banking software of MySQL, and you aren't going to spend a million dollars on a license to power your manga PHPbb discussion forum (active users: 2, including yourself).
Most likely Oracle will keep developing MySQL so that they have something that can take the low end of the market as well as the highend.
Oracle 仍然支持和维护 RDB。 15 年的持续支持和开发，该产品可以与其核心 RDBMS 产品竞争。 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oracle_Rdb
我认为 MySQL 是安全的。 甲骨文将尝试从中创造收入来源，就像从自己的 Linux 发行版中那样。
Oracle still supports and maintains RDB. 15 years of continued support and development in a product which arguably competes with its core RDBMS product. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oracle_Rdb
I think MySQL is safe. Oracle will try to create a revenue stream from it just as it does from its own Linux distribution.
不，再见 OpenSolaris...
No. Farewell OpenSolaris...