Questions asking us to recommend or find a tool, library or favorite off-site resource are off-topic for Stack Overflow as they tend to attract opinionated answers and spam. Instead, describe the problem and what has been done so far to solve it.
Closed 10 years ago.
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱,如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论,将不能在第一时间通知您!
接受
或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
发布评论
评论(6)
您可能想看看我们的测试管理工具 TestRail。 TestRail 与任何基于 Web 的错误跟踪器集成,允许您将测试用例结果链接到错误报告,我们设计 TestRail 具有轻量级/快速的 UI,以使管理测试用例和记录结果尽可能轻松(我知道一些既定的工具,嗯,在这方面表现不佳)。 我们还计划稍后添加对自动化测试的支持。 以下是有关 Trac 集成的更多详细信息:
http://www.gurock .com/testrail/trac-test-management.i.html
You might want to take a look at our test management tool TestRail. TestRail integrates with any web-based bug tracker by allowing you to link test case results to bug reports and we designed TestRail to have a lightweight/fast UI to make managing test cases and recording results as painless as possible (I know that some of the established tools, well, don't shine in this aspect). We also plan to add support for automated tests later on. Here are more details about the Trac integration:
http://www.gurock.com/testrail/trac-test-management.i.html
TestLink 是管理所有测试用例的非常好的方法; 它具有 Trac 集成并得到积极维护。
TestLink is a really nice way to manage all your test cases; it has Trac integration and is actively maintained.
你试试这个 Testlink 和 Bugzilla
两者都是开源且易于使用的
使用此链接
1. http://teamst.org/
2. http://www.bugzilla.org/
You try this Testlink and Bugzilla
Both are open source and easy to use
use this links
1. http://teamst.org/
2. http://www.bugzilla.org/
查看 AceProject。 虽然它是一个完整的项目管理工具,但它也可以方便地维护手动测试结果和测试用例。
Check out AceProject. Though it is a complete project management tool, it can come handy for maintaining manual testing results and test cases too.
我使用一些重量级工具,即 HP QualityCenter。 它可以组织测试、通过任何属性/文本搜索它们、生成测试统计数据、一些报告、缺陷管理。 它很昂贵,所以对你来说可能太多了,但你应该找到其他东西来进行测试管理。
至于问题是否值得……这取决于。 如果是几个月的项目,也许开销太大了。 但是,无论团队规模如何,如果系统很复杂并且您将在该系统上工作一段时间,那么请真正考虑尝试一些测试管理系统。 我作为唯一的测试人员与 4 名开发人员一起工作,因此团队相对较小。 但我们的工作相当复杂。 它不是一个单一的应用程序,而是整个系统。 它是一个网络应用程序,其中包含从主网络应用程序调用的小工具的集合。 此外,它还可以与 MS Project 和 MS Excel 进行交互(带有我们内置工具的集合)。 还有用于管理任务的附加工具。 用于报告的 Oracle Hyperion 服务器。 一些 Citrix 虚拟化。 一组用于与其他系统交互的接口。 只是另一个企业应用程序。
它已有 3-4 年历史,已完成 0ver 2000 次更改/实现。 从一开始,团队中很少有人改变,业务部门也很少有人改变。 而且有很多用户。
如果没有测试管理系统,我们很快就会失去控制。
所以我想说,只有当您失去对测试活动的控制时,您才需要测试管理。 不要只是为了让你的经理得到更好的报告而尝试新工具。 如果当前的报告和测试管理能力不够,请使用它。
I work with some heavyweight tool which is HP QualityCenter. It lets to organize tests, search them by any property/text, generate tests statistics, some reports, defects management. It is expensive, so may be to much for you, but you should find something else to do test management.
As for question is it worth... it depends. If it is few months project, maybe it is to much overhead. But regardles of the team size if system is complex and you will be working on it for some time really consider trying some test management system. I work as only tester with 4 developers, so team is relatively small. But what we work on is quite complicated. It is not one single application, but whole system. It is a web app with collection of small tools that are called from master web app. Additionally it is also interaction with MS Project and MS Excel (with collection of our build in tools). There is additional tool for admin tasks. Oracle Hyperion server for reports. Some Citrix virtualization. Bunch of interfaces for interaction with other systems. Just another corporate app.
It is 3-4 years old, 0ver 2000 changes/implementations done. Since beginning few people on the team changed, few people form business changed. And there is lots of users.
Without Test Management system we would lose control quickly.
So I would say, you need test management only if you are loosing control over testing activities. Don't try new tool just to have your manager nicer reports. use it if current reports and test management capabilities are not sufficient.
看看 FogBugz。 它真的非常光滑。 已经使用了大多数主要软件进行管理测试,并且到目前为止它都排在前 2 或 3 名中。
Check out FogBugz. It's really really slick. Have used most of the major software for manging testing and it is by far up there in the top 2 or 3.