NHibernate,保存 IDictionary : TransientObjectException
在我的类 Case 中,我有一个 IDictionary,其中实体(类)作为键,角色(枚举)作为值。 当尝试保存 Case 的新实例(非持久化)时,IDictionary 中充满了 Entity 的新实例,出现以下错误:
NHibernate.TransientObjectException:对象引用未保存的瞬态实例 - 在刷新之前保存瞬态实例。 类型:实体
这些是类(角色是枚举):
public class Case
{
public Case { EntityCollection = new Dictionary<Entity, Roles>(); }
public virtual int Id { get; set; }
public virtual IDictionary<Entity, Roles> EntityCollection { get; set; }
}
和
public class Entity
{
public virtual int Id { get; set; }
}
映射如下:
<class name="Case" table="[Case]">
<id name="Id" column="Id" type="Int32" unsaved-value="any">
<generator class="hilo"/>
</id>
<map name="EntityCollection" table="CaseEntityRoles"
cascade="save-update" lazy="false" inverse="false">
<key column="CaseId" />
<index-many-to-many class="Entity"
column="EntityId" />
<element column="Roles" type="Roles" not-null="true" />
</map>
</class>
和
<class name="Entity" table="[Entity]">
<id name="Id" column="Id" type="Int32" unsaved-value="0">
<generator class="hilo"/>
</id>
</class>
测试代码示例:
[Test]
public void Can_add_new_case()
{
var newCase = new Case();
newCase.EntityCollection.Add(new Entity(), Roles.Role1);
newCase.EntityCollection.Add(new Entity(), Roles.Role2);
/* At which point I try to persist newCase and get an exception */
}
在测试代码中,newCase 实例被持久化,但新实体则不然。 我尝试了很多不同的方法,例如添加 <version
> 标记到实体并弄乱未保存的值,但似乎没有任何帮助。 正如您从映射中看到的那样,我确实有cascade =“save-update”。 有任何想法吗?
In my class Case I have an IDictionary with Entity (a class) as key and Roles (an enum) as value. When trying to save a new instance (non-persisted) of Case, where the IDictionary is filled with new instances of Entity I get the following error:
NHibernate.TransientObjectException: object references an unsaved transient instance - save the transient instance before flushing. Type: Entity
These are the classes (Roles is an enum):
public class Case
{
public Case { EntityCollection = new Dictionary<Entity, Roles>(); }
public virtual int Id { get; set; }
public virtual IDictionary<Entity, Roles> EntityCollection { get; set; }
}
and
public class Entity
{
public virtual int Id { get; set; }
}
And mapping is as follows:
<class name="Case" table="[Case]">
<id name="Id" column="Id" type="Int32" unsaved-value="any">
<generator class="hilo"/>
</id>
<map name="EntityCollection" table="CaseEntityRoles"
cascade="save-update" lazy="false" inverse="false">
<key column="CaseId" />
<index-many-to-many class="Entity"
column="EntityId" />
<element column="Roles" type="Roles" not-null="true" />
</map>
</class>
and
<class name="Entity" table="[Entity]">
<id name="Id" column="Id" type="Int32" unsaved-value="0">
<generator class="hilo"/>
</id>
</class>
Sample of the test code:
[Test]
public void Can_add_new_case()
{
var newCase = new Case();
newCase.EntityCollection.Add(new Entity(), Roles.Role1);
newCase.EntityCollection.Add(new Entity(), Roles.Role2);
/* At which point I try to persist newCase and get an exception */
}
In the testcode the newCase-instance is persisted, but the new entities are not. I've tried a lot of different things, like adding a <version
> tag to Entity and messing around with unsaved-value, but nothing seems to help. And as you can see from the mapping I do have cascade="save-update".
Any ideas?
如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱,如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论,将不能在第一时间通知您!
发布评论
评论(2)
我认为在尝试持久化 Case 之前,您需要首先持久化 Case 引用的 Entity 对象。 我有一个类似的问题,我是这样解决的。 例如,使用 Rhino NHRepository:
I think you need to persist the Entity objects that are referenced by the Case first, before you try to persist the Case. I had a similar issue that I solved this way. For example, using the Rhino NHRepository:
如果将 inverse 设置为 true 会发生什么?
我不知道这是否能解决您的问题...
您可以做的是利用存储库模式,并创建一个“CaseRepository”类。
在该存储库中,您将有一个 Save 方法来保存给定的案例。
在该保存方法中,您可以循环遍历给定案例的所有实体,并为每个实体显式调用“SaveOrUpdate”。
我还想知道为什么你要使用字典来解决这个问题?
What happens if you set inverse to true ?
I dont know whether this wil solve your problem ...
What you could do, is make use of the Repository pattern, and create a 'CaseRepository' class.
In that repository, you will have a Save method which would Save a given Case.
In that save method, you could loop over all the entities for the given Case and explicitly call 'SaveOrUpdate' for each Entity.
I also wonder why you are using a Dictionary for this issue ?