类型模板化数组的 alloca():如何做到这一点?
我有一个智能指针类型,并且想要构造一个对象,该对象采用该类型的指针和计数(在运行时动态计算),并从堆栈中分配足够的内存来保存智能指针指向的对象的许多实例。 我似乎找不到正确的语法来实现这一点; 是否可以?
给定这样的事情,
template<typename T>
class PointerWrapper
{
public:
PointerWrapper( T const * _pointer ): m_pointer(_pointer) {}
typedef T Type;
T const * m_pointer;
};
template<typename T>
class SomeObject: public NoCopyOrAssign
{
public:
SomeObject( void * _allocaBuffer, PointerWrapper<T> _source, int _count );
};
我想做这样的事情:
void Test( PointerWrapper<int> _array, int _count )
{
SomeObject<int> object = MakeSomeObject( _array, _count );
// do some work with object
};
调用以下宏的代码无法编译,因为编译器无法从 _wrappedPtr 推导出 SomeObject 的模板参数,因此抱怨模板参数丢失:
#define MakeSomeObject(_wrappedPtr, _runtimeCount) \
SomeObject(alloca(sizeof(_wrappedPtr::Type)*_runtimeCount), \
_wrappedPtr, _runtimeCount)
如果在指针包装类型上模板化的函数使用时,虽然编译器可以隐式推导类型,但调用它的代码不会编译,因为 SomeObject 故意定义但没有实现复制构造函数或赋值运算符; 即使它确实编译了,它也不会做正确的事情,因为 alloca() 提供的内存将立即超出范围:
template<typename WrappedT>
SomeObject<typename WrappedT::Type> MakeSomeObject
( WrappedT _pointer, uint _runtimeCount )
{
return SomeObject<typename WrappedT::Type>
( alloca(sizeof(typename WrappedT::Type)*_runtimeCount),
_pointer, _runtimeCount );
}
我想避免将类型作为参数传递到宏中,因为在实际代码中这会导致在使用时使用相当冗长、难以阅读的语句,但是我想如果没有更好的办法的话,这是一个后备方案。
I have a smart pointer type, and would like to construct an object that takes a pointer of that type and a count (dynamically calculated at runtime) and allocates enough memory from the stack to hold that many instances of the object the smart pointer points to. I can't seem to find quite the right syntax to achieve this; is it possible?
Given something like this
template<typename T>
class PointerWrapper
{
public:
PointerWrapper( T const * _pointer ): m_pointer(_pointer) {}
typedef T Type;
T const * m_pointer;
};
template<typename T>
class SomeObject: public NoCopyOrAssign
{
public:
SomeObject( void * _allocaBuffer, PointerWrapper<T> _source, int _count );
};
I want to do something like this:
void Test( PointerWrapper<int> _array, int _count )
{
SomeObject<int> object = MakeSomeObject( _array, _count );
// do some work with object
};
Code invoking the following macro doesn't compile, because the compiler cannot deduce SomeObject's template parameter from _wrappedPtr so complains that the template parameter is missing:
#define MakeSomeObject(_wrappedPtr, _runtimeCount) \
SomeObject(alloca(sizeof(_wrappedPtr::Type)*_runtimeCount), \
_wrappedPtr, _runtimeCount)
If a function templated on the pointer wrapper type is used, although the compiler can deduce the types implicitly, code invoking it doesn't compile because SomeObject deliberately defines but does not implement a copy constructor or assignment operator; even if it did compile it would not do the right thing because the memory provided by alloca() would immediately go out of scope:
template<typename WrappedT>
SomeObject<typename WrappedT::Type> MakeSomeObject
( WrappedT _pointer, uint _runtimeCount )
{
return SomeObject<typename WrappedT::Type>
( alloca(sizeof(typename WrappedT::Type)*_runtimeCount),
_pointer, _runtimeCount );
}
I'd like to avoid passing the type into the macro as an argument since in the real code this would result in quite lengthy, hard-to-read statements at the point of use, however I guess that is a fallback if nothing better is possible.
如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱,如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论,将不能在第一时间通知您!
发布评论
评论(1)
没关系,解决了; 诀窍是将这两种方法结合起来:
Never mind, worked it out; the trick was to combine both approaches: