平衡集成水平与轻松在内联网中添加新软件:门户、CMS 等?

发布于 2024-07-25 02:30:45 字数 543 浏览 2 评论 0原文

快速背景:我是我们中型公司的门户管理员。 目前,我们的内联网政策是尝试将所有内容集成到我们的内联网门户中(我们主要将其用作 CMS,也集成了一些应用程序)。 这意味着我们的所有软件在最终用户看来都来自一个站点,这是一件好事。 但这也意味着我们必须修改我们想要合并到网站中的几乎所有软件以适应门户。 这样做的缺点是我们门户的每个组件(cms、博客、论坛等)都不是最好的,而且说实话,与免费和开源的对应组件(wordpress 、phpbb、mediawiki 都是我想到的例子)。 因为用户被迫使用这些低于标准的工具,所以他们不高兴。

我们目前正在研究另一端,即我们内联网中的每个软件都没有集成,但我们能够使用同类最佳的免费软件。 我们将能够更快地向公司推出新服务,但缺点是服务无法集成。 例如,wordpress 中的用户个人资料(在我们的例子中是移动类型)不会连接到其他应用程序中的用户个人资料。 软件重叠,查找信息比较困难,用户也不满意。

贵公司如何平衡快速集成新工具的能力与向用户呈现单一连贯界面的愿望? 您是选择一个企业平台并强迫自己留在其边界内,还是尝试在许多不同的工具之间提供凝聚力?

Quick background: i'm the portal admin for our medium sized company. Currently, our intranet policy is to try to integrate everything into our intranet portal, (which we use mostly as a CMS, with a handful of applications integrated as well). This means that all of our software appears to the end user to come from one site, which is good. But it also means that we have to modify just about every piece of software that we want to incorporate into the website to fit into the portal. The disadvantage of this is that each component of our portal (the cms, the blogging, forums, etc) are not best-of-breed, and to be quite honest, they are pretty bad compared to their free and open source counterparts (wordpress, phpbb, mediawiki, are examples that come to mind). Because the users are forced to use these subpar tools, they aren't happy.

We are currently looking at the other end of the spectrum, where each piece of software in our intranet isn't integrated, but we are able to use best-of-breed free software. We would be able to much more rapidly roll out new services to our company, but the down side is that the services wouldn't be integrated. A users profile in wordpress (movable type, in our case) is not connected to their profile in the other applications, for example. The software overlaps, finding information is more difficult, users aren't happy either.

How does your company balance the ability to rapidly integrate new tools with the desire to have a single coherent interface presented to the user? Do you pick one enterprise platform and force yourselves to stay wtihin its boundries or do you attempt to provide cohesion between many disparate tools?

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(1

演多会厌 2024-08-01 02:30:45

不幸的是,每个工具都需要单独分析,而且难度通常取决于许多不同的因素(技术、框架、设计)。 但最重要的是集成级别和集成点(身份、接口)。

编辑:
顺便说一句,花一些时间对潜在解决方案进行一些原型设计和评估是个好主意。

Unfortunately every tool needs separate analysing and very often difficulty depends on many different factors (technology, frameworks, design). But the most important is integration level and integration points (Identity, interface).

Edit:
btw, good idea would be to spend some time on some prototyping and evaluation of potential solutions.

~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文