LePUS3相对于UML有哪些优势?
当在线搜索面向对象的概念时,例如复合设计模式,我经常发现它们在 LePUS3 中得到体现符号。 我对此不太熟悉 建模语言。
我应该更喜欢它而不是 UML 吗?
When searching online for object oriented concepts such as the composite design pattern I often found them represented in the LePUS3 notation. I am not really familiar with this
modeling language.
Is it something I should prefer over UML?
如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱,如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论,将不能在第一时间通知您!
发布评论
评论(3)
LePUS3 旨在改进其他建模语言,并专门设计为 UML 的增强。 LePUS3的好处在介绍它的论文中列出,你可以看到一个总结这些好处可以在链接中的科学论文预览中看到。
我将在这里重现本文所述的优点:
LePUS3 was designed to be an improvement over other modeling languages and is specifically designed to be an enhancement to UML. The benefits of LePUS3 are laid out in the paper that introduced it, and you can see a summary of these benefits on the preview of the scientific paper show at the link.
I'll reproduce the paper's stated advantages here:
我想说,除了其他答案提到的 LePus3 的其他良好功能之外,在我看来,还有一个非常重要的功能:
在 UML 中,您可以制定 SW 计划
在LePus3中,你可以制定一个计划,或者计划的计划,或者计划的计划的计划,甚至是几个抽象级别的通用计划。
LePus3 是唯一一种形式化且同时适用于元思维的图表语言。
另一方面,使用 LePus3 需要更高的智力。 他们之间的水平差距很大。 如果您是 UML 的优秀用户,那确实意味着您可以使用 LePus3。 可惜他们之间没有任何仪器。
是的,我喜欢 LePus3!
I would say that apart from other good features of LePus3, mentioned by the other answers, there is one more, extremely important from my point of view:
In UML you can make a plan of SW
In LePus3 you can make a plan, or a plan of the plan, or a plan of the plan of the plan, or even the common plan for several levels of abstraction.
The LePus3 is the only diagram language that is formalized and simultaneously adapted for metathinking.
On the other hand, using of LePus3 requires very much greater intellect. The level difference between them is great. If you are a good user of UML, that does mean you can use LePus3. It is pity that there are no instruments between them.
And yes, I love LePus3!