数字时钟系统/软件？ （员工打卡）
数字打卡系统如何处理用户错误，例如有人忘记下班或有人错误地输入代码导致他们给其他人打卡/下班（他们甚至可能不在当天的时间表上）。 很明显可能存在不诚实问题，但人为错误又如何呢？
How does a digital clocking system deal with user error such as someone forgetting to clock out or someone erroneously entering their code causing them to clock someone else in/out (who might not even be on the schedule that day). Its obvious there could be issues of dishonesty, but what about human error?
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（3）
更好的 T&A（时间和出勤）程序实际上可以通过多种方式进行配置。 （顺便说一句，通常打卡软件本身只是标记一个“交易” - 该员工当时做了这件事 - 没有进一步处理，将其留给 T＆A 系统。）
需要注意的是，所有这些结果都是“合法的”，具体取决于组织、合同等。
现在，输入错误的员工代码 - 大多数情况下它是基于员工卡（甚至某种形式的生物识别扫描仪），但当员工需要手动输入代码时，控制台应显示员工的姓名以进行验证，然后显示第二个“批准”按钮。
此外，在某种程度上，这可以自动发现并标记为手动跟进，例如在夜班员工显示为早上打卡的情况下，或总部人员在远程分支机构打卡的情况下。
The better T&A (time & attendance) programs actually let this be configured in any of a number of ways. (Btw, typically the clocking software itself just marks down a "transaction" - this employee at that time did this thing - with no further processing, leaving that to the T&A system.)
It's important to note, that all of these results are "legitimate", depending on the organization, contracts, etc.
Now, wrt to entering the wrong employee code - most often it's based on an employee card (or even some form of biometric scanner), but when the employee is expected to manually type in their code, the console should display the employee's name, for verification, and then a second "approve" button.
Also, to some extent this can be discovered automatically and flagged for manual followup, for instance in the case where night-shift employees are shown as clocking in the morning, or HQ personnel clocking at a remote branch office.
系统必须允许打印最终时间表的预览。 然后，员工会得到一份副本，可以验证它并返回修复程序（由老板签名）。 这些数据会与已经存在的数据合并。
除非你劫持你的员工，将 RFID 强行植入他们的脊椎，让他们爬过扫描管四次，否则这是最简单、最安全、最现实的解决方案。
The system must allow to print a preview of the final time sheet. Employees then get a copy, can verify it and return fixes (signed by their boss). These get merged with the data that already exists.
Unless you hijack your employees, force a RFID into their spine and make them crawl through a scanner tube four times a way, that's the most simple, secure and reality-prone solution.
所以如果为了防止人为错误，可以使用密码，实际上就是“验证码”。 因此，如果 Joe 是 0123，Mary 是 0124，则 Joe 输入的 0123 需要与他输入的验证码 8888 进行匹配，以便系统知道这是真的 Joe，而不是 Mary 无意中输入了 0123。
so if it is to prevent human error, a password which is actually a "verification code" can be used. So if Joe is 0123 and Mary is 0124, Joe's entering 0123 needs to be matched with his entering verification code of 8888 so that the system knows it is really Joe, not Mary entering 0123 by accident.