Phing、Xinc 或 phpUnderControl - 哪一个会持续下去?

发布于 2024-07-23 10:48:30 字数 345 浏览 7 评论 0原文

我仍在研究应该使用这些工具中的哪一种。 当我四处闲逛时,我注意到它们都没有真正发布任何新版本:

Xinc
Version 2.0.1 released 02/05/08
Phing
Version 2.3.3 released 12/07/08
phpUnderControl
Version 0.4.4 released 08/09/08

我应该选择 phpUnderControl 因为它有最新版本并且开发可能会继续吗? 我不想仅仅因为 php 5.3 附带的某些功能无法由其中之一处理而在半年内进行切换。

我需要 PHP Unit、SVN 和 Codesniffer 支持。

I am still looking into which one of these tools I should use. When I was poking around I noticed none of them really have any new releases:

Xinc
Version 2.0.1 released 02/05/08
Phing
Version 2.3.3 released 12/07/08
phpUnderControl
Version 0.4.4 released 08/09/08

Should I choose phpUnderControl because it had the latest release and development will probably be continued? I don't want to have to switch in half a year just because some feature that comes with php 5.3 can't be handled by one of them.

I would need PHP Unit, SVN and Codesniffer support.

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(3

小红帽 2024-07-30 10:48:30

在工作中,我们去年问了自己同样的问题,考虑到我们的需求是:

  • 很容易设置的东西; 就可以了,如果你只需要复制/粘贴而不用想太多(目标:不太了解 Linux 的人必须能够安装该软件)
  • 几个命令行
    • PHPUnit
    • phpDocumentor
    • PHP_CodeSniffer
    • SVN 日志 + 提交时自动构建
  • 能够处理一些相当大的项目
  • 一些“性感”的东西,带有图表和所有这些,供我们的客户看到

我们选择了 phpUnderControl。 我记得的几个论点:

  • 优点:非常活跃的项目(经常有新版本)
  • 缺点:JAVA; 意味着 PHP 开发者更难修改/适应
  • 半专业版:PHPUnit 和 phpUnderControl 有点接近(相同的托管,如果我没记错的话); 我们认为这是否是该项目能够生存的一个好兆头^^
  • pro:易于设置; 即使是第一次(我们是几个尝试过的人;通常没有问题)
  • 专业(主观):比 xinc 更性感

我们现在(超过)一年后,我们不后悔我们的选择......让希望再过一两年我们仍然会有同样的感觉!

At work, we asked ourselves about the same question last year, considering our needs are :

  • Something quite easy to set up ; a few command lines are OK, if you just have to copy/paste without thinking too much (goal : someone who doesn't know Linux well must be able to install the software)
  • Integration of
    • PHPUnit
    • phpDocumentor
    • PHP_CodeSniffer
    • SVN log + automatically build when things are committed
  • Ability to handle some rather big projects
  • Something "sexy", with graphs and all that, for our clients to see

We chose phpUnderControl. Couple of arguments that I remember :

  • pro : quite active project (there where new versions really often)
  • con : JAVA ; means harder for PHP developpers to modify / adapt
  • half pro : PHPUnit and phpUnderControl are a bit close (same hosting, if I remember well) ; we considered if was a good sign that the project would live ^^
  • pro : easy to set up ; even the first time (we were a couple of guys who tried ; generally no problem)
  • pro (subjective) : more sexy than xinc

We are now (more than) a year later, and we don't regret our choice... Let hope we'll still feel the same way in another year or two !

泪眸﹌ 2024-07-30 10:48:30

Phing 实际上看起来相当活跃...

http://phing.info/trac/timeline

Phing actually looks pretty active ...

http://phing.info/trac/timeline

凉薄对峙 2024-07-30 10:48:30

Xinc 看起来比 phpUnderControl 更活跃,后者已经发布了将近一年了。 但就像生活中的一切一样,未来是不确定的,今天看起来稳定和活跃的东西,明天可能就不是这样了。

Xinc looks to be a more active than phpUnderControl, which hasn't released for almost a year. But as with everything in life, the future is uncertain, what appears to be stable and active today, may not be so tomorrow.

~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文