为什么 Squeak 界面看起来和操作起来都那么过时?
不要误会我的意思 - 我喜欢 Smalltalk,但是......
对我来说,Squeak 界面是最大的反感之一。 我喜欢 Smalltalk——而不是用户界面。 人们只需将现代界面(如 GNOME、MacOS X 和 Windows Vista)与 Squeak 的平面 2-D 卡通 16 色(或者是 256 色?)界面进行对比,它们将易用性和视觉上赏心悦目相结合。
我们难道不会看到现代用户界面设计融入 Squeak 中吗?
或者我完全错过了一些东西并且当前的计算机用户界面都是错误的?
Don't get me wrong - I love Smalltalk, but...
To me, the Squeak interface is one of the biggest turnoffs. I love Smalltalk - not the user interface. One only has to contrast modern interfaces like GNOME, MacOS X, and Windows Vista with their combination of ease of use and visually pleasing eye-candy with Squeak's flat 2-D cartoony 16-color (or is it 256 colors?) interface.
Aren't we ever going to see modern user interface design put into Squeak?
Or am I missing something entirely and the current crop of computer user interfaces are all wrong?
如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d5906/d59060df4059a6cc364216c4d63ceec29ef7fe66" alt="扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群"
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱,如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论,将不能在第一时间通知您!
发布评论
评论(6)
使用众多替代 UI 之一,而不是默认的外观和界面。 感觉。 例如,Pharo 看起来很像 OSX。
Ramon Leon 还有另一篇文章,修复 Squeak 的芝麻街外观窗口,有 < a href="http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/2286" rel="noreferrer">Zurgle,以及可能还有更多其他内容,定期在 squeak-dev。
Use one of the many alternative UIs instead of the default look & feel. Pharo's looks a lot like OSX, for instance.
Ramon Leon has another article, Fixing Squeak's Sesame Street Looking Windows, there's Zurgle, and probably a lot more others, announced periodically on squeak-dev.
Newspeak 建立在 Squeak 之上,并且具有非常不同的外观。 您可以在本机窗口(如大多数其他 IDE)和形态窗口(如 Squeak/Pharo 中)之间进行选择。
Newspeak is built on top of Squeak and has a very different look. You can choose between native windows (like most other IDEs) and morphic windows (like in Squeak/Pharo).
Squeak 被设计为创建新的、创新的用户界面的工具,并且有一些很好的示例 - 看看 Scratch< /a>,例如。 不幸的是,Squeak IDE 本身并没有做出同样的努力。 然而,这种情况可能正在改变 - 看看 Pharo,它是 Squeak 的一个分支,它改进了字体等功能、颜色等,并去除一些吱吱声枯木。
Squeak was designed as a tool for creating new, innovative user interfaces, and there are some great examples - take a look at Scratch, for instance. Unfortunately, the same effort has not gone into the Squeak IDE itself. This may be changing, however - take a look at Pharo, a fork of Squeak which improves things like fonts, colours etc. and strips out some of the Squeak deadwood.
一个问题是,在我们获得分配给所有现有核心的 MIT/BSD 许可证之前,我们目前的许可情况有点混乱。 一旦我们实现了这一点,我们就可以转向模块化系统,而更新 UI 显然是其结果的一部分。
One problem is that we're currently in a bit of a licensing mess until we get the MIT/BSD license assigned to all of the existing core. Once we get that in place, we can move forward to a modular system, and updating the UI is clearly part of the outcome of that.
使用 GNU Smalltalk、“The Smalltalk for those who can type™”或 Squeak 无头模式。 然后,如果您仍然想要 GUI(只是不是包罗万象的传统 Smalltalk GUI),只需编写自己的 GUI(可能是现有 IDE 的插件)。
Use GNU Smalltalk, "The Smalltalk for those who can type™" or Squeak in headless mode. And then if you still want a GUI (just not the all-encompassing traditional Smalltalk GUI), just write your own (perhaps a plug-in to an existing IDE).
Polymorph 包可以修复 Squeak UI,使其看起来更好。
为此向 Simon Kirk 和 Pinesoft 团队表示敬意!
你可以在这里找到它:
显然
Pharo 已经构建了它在。
The Polymorph package can fix up Squeak UI to look much better.
Kudos to Simon Kirk and the team at Pinesoft for this!
You can find it here:
http://www.squeaksource.com/@eCflHJVA_R3o9HjK/wFyW_CgF
Apparently Pharo has it built in.