用于 PHP 项目持续集成的推荐服务器
我正在开发一个 PHP 项目，我想知道有关实施持续集成的建议。
我已经阅读了所有理论，但我从未使用过持续集成。 所以应该很容易开始。
我读过有关 Xinc、Hudson 等，但我想根据经验获得一些反馈。 您在 PHP 项目中使用过持续集成吗？ 你有什么经验吗？ 您会推荐哪个服务器？
I'm working on a PHP project and I would like to know recommendations for implementing continuous integration.
I've read all the theory, but I never got to use continuous integration. So it should be rather easy to start.
I've read about Xinc, Hudson, among others, but I would like to get some feedback based on experience. Have you used continuous integration in PHP projects? What has been your experience? Which server would you recommend?
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（3）
还有Jenkins现在Oracle在Hudson上做文章。 它有一个配置模板，可以非常轻松地使用您需要的所有 QA 工具进行设置PHP CI 环境：
There is also Jenkins now that Oracle made a fuss about Hudson. There is a config template for it that makes it ridiculously easy to setup with all the QA Tools you'd need for a PHP CI environment:
我很幸运地使用了基于 CruiseControl 的 phpUnderControl。
I have had good luck with phpUnderControl, which is based on CruiseControl.
我尝试过 CruiseControl 与 phpUnderControl 和 Hudson。 我也看了Xinc，但目前似乎太有限了。
我最终选择了 Hudson，因为它比 CruiseControl 更容易设置，并且可以很好地与 ant 脚本或简单的 bash 脚本配合使用。
另一个看起来很有前途的选择是仲裁。 它有点像 trac，但添加了 CI。 Symfony 人员也做了一些事情，但还处于非常早期的阶段。
I have tried CruiseControl with phpUnderControl and Hudson. I also had a look at Xinc, but it seems to be too limited at the moment.
I went with Hudson in the end, because it is a lot easier to set up than CruiseControl and works well with either ant scripts or simple bash scripts.
Another option which looks promising is arbit. It is a bit like trac, but adds CI. There is also something by the Symfony guys, but it is at a very early stage.