ZigBee 堆栈建议
我已经有一段时间不了解 ZigBee 了。 谁拥有最成熟的 Zigbee 堆栈？ 是 Microchip、Chipcon 还是 Atmel？
有没有价格低于 10 美元的 RF 模块？
我记得不久前某些堆栈存在一些许可问题...
（这个问题最初是在 2009 年提出的。截至 2012 年，我认为 Ember 不再是领先的堆栈。似乎 德州仪器 已成为占主导地位的芯片组/堆栈...不过，他们的堆栈似乎确实被锁定为使用IAR 的 IDE 很糟糕，这会让我在使用它时三思而后行。）
I've been out of the loop on ZigBee for a while now. Who has the most mature Zigbee stack? Is it Microchip, Chipcon, or Atmel?
Are there RF modules down to less than US$10 yet?
I recall there was some licensing issues with certain stacks a while back...
(This question was originally asked in 2009. As of 2012, I don't think Ember is a leading stack anymore. It seems that Texas Instruments has become the dominant chipset/stack... Although, their stack does seem to be locked to using IAR's terrible IDE which would make me think twice about using it.)
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（3）
我们使用 Ember Corporation SoC 芯片已有一段时间了。 他们的芯片、工具和实用程序给我留下了深刻的印象。 一些公司将它们用于插件模块，Digi 的 XBee 和 Telegesis 是我们合作过的两家公司。
Ember 还实施了 ZCL 以及 HA 和 SA 配置文件，可供您使用。
www.ember.com
We've been using the Ember Corporation SoC chips for some time now. I'm very impressed with their chip, tools, and utilities. Some companies are using them for plug in modules, Digi's XBee and Telegesis are two that we have worked with.
Ember also has the ZCL and the HA and SA profiles implemented, ready for you to use.
www.ember.com
我已经对 TI 堆栈做了一些工作。 我想这……好吧。 IDE 的限制使其变得非常糟糕，并且存在一些粗糙的边缘。 文档并不是那么好，当您达到一定水平时，您会遇到闭源驱动程序模块（这可能是供应商之间的常见限制，没有对它们进行足够的了解，无法立即了解。）使用 TI 堆栈构建了概念验证演示后，我仍在寻找替代方案。
在 ESC 和 CES 上看到了很多这样的产品。 作为参考，一些选项（没有特别认可，按字母顺序排列）
欢迎任何其他建议/替代方案。
I've done some work with the TI stack. It's... ok I guess. The IDE limitation makes it pretty awful, and there are some rough edges. Documentation isn't all that great, and when you hit a certain level you run into a closed-source driver module (this might be a common limitation among vendors, haven't done enough with them all to know offhand.) Still, after having built a proof-of-concept demo with the TI stack, I'm still looking for alternatives.
Saw a bunch of them at ESC and CES. For reference, some options (no particular endorsement either way, in alphabetical order)
Any other suggestions/alternatives would be welcome.
两年后的 2011 年，Ember 的 ZigBee 堆栈是明显的赢家。 Ember 拥有足够的 ZigBee 市场，可以成为有效的标准，并且大多数插件模块，包括 Digi 的 Xbee 和 Telegesis 构建在 Ember 的 SoC 之上。
Chipcom/Texas Instruments 对 Ember 协议有一些不同的解释，一般来说，他们的堆栈不太灵活。 如果您不想扫描网络并按照他们推荐的方式加入，那么您基本上就不走运了。
我没有使用过任何其他堆栈。
Two years later in 2011, Ember's ZigBee stack is the clear winner. Ember has enough of the ZigBee market to be an effective standard, and most plugin modules, including Digi's Xbee and Telegesis are built on top of Ember's SoCs.
Chipcom/Texas Instruments has some different interpretations of the protocol from Ember and in general their stack is less flexible. If you don't want to scan networks and join the way they recommend, you are basically out of luck.
I haven't used any other stacks.